Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Wed Oct 7 07:03:12 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: linux-2.6
> tags 545229 + pending
Bug #545229 {Done: maximilian attems }
[linux
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 15:55 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
>
> I had been led to expect (again, by the wiki page, but also by common
> sense) that the domU was meant to get its clock from Xen and didn't
> need to run NTP. This appears to only be the case when the domU kernel
> includes the SuSE patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 550017 linux-2.6
Bug #550017 [linux-2.6.30-2-bigmem] linux-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem: ondemand
governor never maxes cpu frequency
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-2.6.30-2-bigmem'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6.30-2-bigmem' to 'linux-2.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 550017 linux-2.6
Bug #550017 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem: ondemand governor never
maxes cpu frequency
Ignoring request to reassign bug #550017 to the same package
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:01:38AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please post output of:
> sh -x mkinitramfs -o /dev/null
Attached. The bug is fairly obvious, device names in /proc/mdstat are
always assumed to have a fixed length.
Simon
+ umask 0022
+ export PATH=/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
+
Package: linux-2.6.30-2-bigmem
Version: 2.6.30-8
On a Core2Duo E8500, the ondemand governor never sets the CPU to
maxfreq. Actually, it never appears to change the frequency from
2000.000 (as reported by /proc/cpuinfo).
Setting the scaling_governor to performance immediately takes the cpu(s)
to
2009/10/6 Ben Hutchings
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:26 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Ben Hutchings
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > Could you try adding 'noapic' to the kernel command line?
> >
> > Sure. Here is /proc/interrupts using irqpoll + noapic (yet
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: normal
I have a single DVI screen connected to the box but the module says
something about LVDS.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.30-2-686 (Debian 2.6.30-8) (wa...@debian.org) (gcc version
4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-
reassign 550032 linux-2.6
thanks
On Oct 07, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> If i boot up I have /dev/ttyS[23] 0 and 1 is completely missing. If I do
> rmmod 8250_pnp;modprobe 8250_pnp ttys1 is created but not 0.
Your kernel believes this, udev just follows instructions from the
kernel.
--
ciao,
Marc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 532613 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14151
Bug #532613 [linux-2.6] snd_via82xx: volume levels too low
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14151'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 550032 linux-2.6
Bug #550032 [udev] ttyS0 device not created with latest udev
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions udev/146-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:37:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is my suggested change, so far only compile-tested:
>
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
>
> if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size))
> return -
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Hello,
both currently ship /usr/include/scsi/scsi.h
Best regards
Uwe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (70, 'experimental'), (70, 'unstable'), (70,
'stable')
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 06:10:11PM +0200, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
> At least on Asus Eeepc 701, the SD card reader seems not a true SDHC reader.
> But it works with the default OS.
>
> It even has worked on mine two times, I don't know why it suddenly breaks.
Did you try more recent kernels? Do th
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 21:46 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Ben
>
> How was the meeting at LPC in Portland?
> Or more specifically, did you conclude any good plans for Debian :-)
Yes. A summary will be posted to d-d-a soon.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
To err is human; to really foul things up requ
Hi Ben
How was the meeting at LPC in Portland?
Or more specifically, did you conclude any good plans for Debian :-)
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:32:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 18:56 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Ben
> >
> > Very good informa
Great!
// Ola
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:09:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 21:46 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Ben
> >
> > How was the meeting at LPC in Portland?
> > Or more specifically, did you conclude any good plans for Debian :-)
>
> Yes. A summary will be
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:11:38 +0200
with message-id <20091007201138.gc5...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Additional info and still
occuring
has caused the Debian Bug report #462229,
regarding sata - sata_nv - sata link fails on heavy load
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:11:30 +0200
with message-id <20091007201130.gb5...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: modprobe diskonchip
unconditionally formatted my mtd device! :(
has caused the Debian Bug report #435054,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: modprobe
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:12:04 +0200
with message-id <20091007201204.gf5...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: your mail
has caused the Debian Bug report #498134,
regarding hang in cow_break_link()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:11:21 +0200
with message-id <20091007201120.ga5...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: please add timezone option to vfat mounts
has caused the Debian Bug report #382303,
regarding please add timezone option to vfat mounts
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:16 +0200
with message-id <20091007201816.ga30...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: This problem is common on Eeepc
has caused the Debian Bug report #498021,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: task blocked after connecting the SDHC
memory card
to b
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:06:12PM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
> Version: 2.6.26-4
> Severity: important
>
> This version hangs at boot during the consolechars invocation in
> /etc/init.d/console-screen.sh (found by set -x in the script). At this
> point not ev
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:12:58PM +0200, Philipp Hübner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this bug is definitely present in up2date Lenny.
>
> I have several machines running kvm, and they all have this problem.
> Guests at high load get stuck and cause 100% cpu load on as many
> cores/cpus in the host as have b
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:48:07AM +0100, phil wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
> Version: 2.6.26-10
> Severity: critical
> File: ocfs2
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> two system with 400gb raid1 (hda2) each, with drbd and ocfs2 as filesystem,
> volume is shared to local net
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:27 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:37:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is my suggested change, so far only compile-tested:
> >
> > --- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> > @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
> >
> > if (hfsplus_ge
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 11:38 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
>
>
> 2009/10/6 Ben Hutchings
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:26 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Ben Hutchings
>
> > wrote:
>
>
$ ls /boot/config*
/boot/config-2.6.18-6-amd64 /boot/config-2.6.29-2-amd64
/boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64 /boot/config-2.6.30-1-amd64
$ grep LBD /boot/config*
/boot/config-2.6.18-6-amd64:CONFIG_LBD=y
Is it at all concerning that the sd driver tries a read capacity 16 and
fails?
I propose the follo
FWIW, HFS Plus has a maximum size of (2^63 - 2^31) bytes, which is just shy
of 8EB.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2422
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HFS_Plus
dan :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:40:12 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#492721: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't
boot on Via EPIA EK
has caused the Debian Bug report #492721,
regarding linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't boot on Via EPIA EK
to be marked as d
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 17:10 -0400, Dan Dennison wrote:
> FWIW, HFS Plus has a maximum size of (2^63 - 2^31) bytes, which is just shy
> of 8EB.
>
> http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2422
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HFS_Plus
I know. I'm talking about the Linux implementation.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchin
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 16:26 -0400, Dan Dennison wrote:
> $ ls /boot/config*
> /boot/config-2.6.18-6-amd64 /boot/config-2.6.29-2-amd64
> /boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64 /boot/config-2.6.30-1-amd64
>
> $ grep LBD /boot/config*
> /boot/config-2.6.18-6-amd64:CONFIG_LBD=y
CONFIG_LBD is irrelevant on 64-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 550032 udev 146
Bug #550032 [linux-2.6] ttyS0 device not created with latest udev
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'udev'.
Bug #550032 [udev] ttyS0 device not created with latest udev
There is no source info for the package 'ude
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Following on from discussions at the Linux Plumbers Conference, I'd like
to remind you all of the kernel packagers' list:
kernel-packag...@vger.kernel.org
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#kernel-packagers
It is currently inactive but could be useful for cross-distro
c
-original message-
From: "Ben Hutchings" b...@decadent.org.uk
To: "Dan Dennison" d...@thedennisons.org, 550...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:02:40 +0100
-
> CONFIG_LBD is irrelevant on 64-bit architectures.
El Miércoles 07 Octubre 2009, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 11:38 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > 2009/10/6 Ben Hutchings
> > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:26 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM,
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:03 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
[...]
> Googling around I found this bug is quite old:
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0302.1/0966.html
>
> And this:
>
> http://fixunix.com/suse/125711-problem-via-rhine-ii-eth0.html
>
> It seems the fix i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 550130 + pending
Bug #550130 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev should replace libc6-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
You're using the Atheros proprietary driver (aka madwifi), which we do
not have source for and so cannot debug. I suspect that this may be
responsible for at least some of the crashes. Please can you remove
this and try using the ath5k driver instead?
Ben.
I tri
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb:
> Could you try 2.6.31 from experimental (and soon unstable); there have been
> many KVM changes for the past two kernel releases. If the problem persists,
> it should be reported upstream.
for me, the problem already disappeared when using 2.6.30 from
lenny-backpo
40 matches
Mail list logo
