I do not have whiptail installed (saw no sense in having both dialog
and whiptail installed).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:52 +0100, Piotr Skólski wrote:
> After thrid line (pathing using debian script)
>
> chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py
> debian/bin/gencontrol.py
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 331, in
> Gencontrol()()
> File "debian/bi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 566539 + pending
Bug #566539 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-486: Minor formatting issue on
info screen during update
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, s
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:51 -0800, Mike Castle wrote:
> ii debconf 1.5.28
> Debian configuration management system
> ii debconf-i18n 1.5.28
> full internationalization su
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 536099 2.6.26-17
Bug #536099 [src:linux-2.6] ntfs: kernel BUG at fs/ntfs/inode.c:339! invalid
opcode: [1] SMP
Bug #508877 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: invalid opcode:
[1] SMP
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 508877 src:linux-2.6
Bug #508877 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: invalid
opcode: [1] SMP
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Anders Boström wrote:
>> IP-header length field, but is shorter.
> >>
> JY> following is my test cese,
>
> JY> a nfs server server with ar8131chip, device id 1063.
> export /tmp/ dir as the nfs share directory, JY> the client,
> mount the server_ip:/tmp to local dir /mnt/nfs, ust a python
> sc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 566547 + pending
Bug #566547 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Segmentation fault
during halt
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Jan 25, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Actually I meant "vzctl exec" so this is not even close: I need to
> > change the context of a running process.
> Hu? "vzctl exec" does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the
> support y
This was commit 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0 upstream.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
From 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:13:46 +0100
Su
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
> As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,
> Cgroup memory controller is not. This setting is mandatory if you want
> to control the available memory per containers and the like.
It is not mandantory for the syst
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Suno Ano wrote:
> Bastian> Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
> Bastian> images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
> Bastian> and does not warrant for an extra image.
>
> As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , l
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux-next commit 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0 contains a
fix for this bug. I'd really appreciate it if you'd cherry-pick this for
2.6.32 (which I understand squeeze is going to release with). The diff
i
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Actually I meant "vzctl exec" so this is not even close: I need to
> change the context of a running process.
Hu? "vzctl exec" does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the
support you want is actually implemented.
Bastian
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > >
> > > > I guess this means that the next version i
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 20:02:31 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > > unless it gets a stable ABI (
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > > unless it gets a stable ABI
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
[]
>> On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support
>> and not all net/ has netns support yet.
> It's not just that, AFAIK there is no match for many of the
> user_beancounters features (especially the accounting part) and
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> > unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> > from migrating for the time
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
>> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
>> from migrating for the time being?
>>
> The 2.6.30 kernel and th
Hello,
Debian Lenny linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen uses an early snapshot of Novell SLES11
patches,
so I guess someone would have to go through the SLES11 kernel-xen patches
and see what has changed.. I believe SLES11 Xen patches have numerous bugfixes
compared to what is in Lenny.
ftp://ftp.suse.com
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> from migrating for the time being?
>
The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't can
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Ben Hutchings wrote:
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes
Hello,
> Sure, where can I find it?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2010/01/msg00577.html
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions| http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
maximilian attems 2010-01-25 11:51:
> see ongoing discussions about lxc flavour, you might want to jump in.
Sure, where can I find it?
> current conclusion is that we might enable aboves,
> but disable it on boot with modprobe.conf to not get overheads
> for the generic linux images.
That wo
> "JY" == Jie Yang writes:
JY> Anders Boström wrote:
>> Cc: b...@decadent.org.uk; net...@vger.kernel.org;
>> 565...@bugs.debian.org; Xiong Huang
>> Subject: Re: Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e:
>> TSO is broken
>> One strange observation is that I can only reproduce this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 561552 + pending
Bug #561552 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: [agp/drm] agp + dri
unavailable with testing X.org 1.6.5
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of mes
reassign 566356 linux-2.6
--
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:03:14PM +0530, gnath wrote:
> using external hard disk formatted with ntfs on usb port gives
> read only mode. Can use or play with files on EHD without write/create.
>
> use additional flashdisk/pendrive with vfat on another usb port with r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 566356 linux-2.6
Bug #566356 [mount] mount ntfs external hard disk on usb port for read only
Bug reassigned from package 'mount' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions util-linux/2.16.2-0.
> --
Stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> > > early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> > > Therefore I p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> > early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> > Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
> > released.
>
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Brian Kroth wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Support for memory cgroups controllers are not included in the new
> 2.6.32 kernel. This would be nice say for putting limits on a how much
> memory a group of VMs can u
Caso não visualize esse email adequadamente acesse este link
http://cjf.mkt9.com/ver_mensagem.php?id=H|506|21446|124602795261937700
Se você não deseja mais receber nossos e-mails, cancele sua inscrição
através do link
http://cjf.mkt9.com/admin/sair.php?id=21446|506|0&uid=124602795261937700
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.32-20100124
# Sun Jan 24 19:22:46 2010
#
# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_X86_32=y
# CONFIG_X86_64 is not set
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf32-i386"
CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig"
CONFI
34 matches
Mail list logo
