elen...@planet.nl wrote:
>I don't think the first would be a very good idea as it means that we'll
>still not be rid of the IDE drivers. It seems better to concentrate the
Indeed. Please remember that udev has at least a couple of open bugs
about things like persistent links breaking with the IDE
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> As mentioned in [1], the "vserver" featureset is planned to be removed
> from the Debian linux kernel after the squeeze release. Debian suggests that
> users consider migrating vserver systems to either the L
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 574541 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15577
Bug #574541 [linux-2.6] iwlwifi disconnects
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15577'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: firmware-linux-free
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
The NEWS file about the hd -> scsi migration is included in all binary packages
of linux-2.6. This is problematic because, for example, the message is
displayed by apt-listchanges when firmware-linux-free is upgraded (and not at
all
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:41:41AM +0100, Jesús Ángel del Pozo Domínguez wrote:
> + mbr_check
> + '[' -r /boot/grub/grub.cfg ']'
> ++ awk '/^set root=/{print substr($2, 7, 3); exit}' /boot/grub/grub.cfg
> + groot='(md'
> + '[' -r /boot/grub/menu.lst ']'
> + '[' -e /boot/grub/device.map ']'
> + '['
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 574526 linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
Bug #574526 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: iwlagn flood in dmesg: free
more than tfds_in_queue
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 21:05 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-10
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> it looks like the following upstream commits lead to those repeated
> messages, as soon as there's some traffic on the wireless network:
> | [ 3538.284491] iwlagn 000
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 00:58 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ben Hutchings (18/03/2010):
> > What's the warning?
>
> Assuming it's just about running a grep -i warning on
> /var/log/messages, here you are:
>
> Mar 18 20:00:34 bowmore kernel: [0.00] [ cut here
> ]
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:53:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > > > go reading /proc/acpi/ibm/vide
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: normal
I think it is a kernel bug and you can track it here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15575
Please, if possible, include a patch in 2.6.32 (or .33) Debian kernel
after the solution.
Regards,
Eriberto - Brazil
-- System Informat
Ben Hutchings (18/03/2010):
> What's the warning?
Assuming it's just about running a grep -i warning on
/var/log/messages, here you are:
Mar 18 20:00:34 bowmore kernel: [0.00] [ cut here
]
Mar 18 20:00:34 bowmore kernel: [0.00] WARNING: at
/build/mattems
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 21:05 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-10
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> it looks like the following upstream commits lead to those repeated
> messages, as soon as there's some traffic on the wireless network:
> | [ 3538.284491] iwlagn 000
severity 574553 important
tags 574553 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07:39PM +0100, Jes???gel wrote:
>
> r...@gollum:~# dpkg --configure -a
> Configurando initramfs-tools (0.93.4) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Procesando disparadores para
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: normal
I've been regularly getting a kernel oops that leaves this trace (IMPORTANT:
this doesn't happen with kernel 2.6.33, I thought it would be solved in
upstream release 2.6.32.9):
Mar 18 15:56:58 debturion kernel: [10281.468122] WARNING: at
/b
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
r...@gollum:~# dpkg --configure -a
Configurando initramfs-tools (0.93.4) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Procesando disparadores para initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Ge
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 574553 important
Bug #574553 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: PostInst fails (err. 2). "awk:
fatal: ( o \(desemparejados: /(md/"
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 574553 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #574553 [initramfs-to
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: important
getting tons of disconnects on x61s with
[20396.771335] iwlagn :03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:25:84:02:e3:39
tid = 0
both with 2.6.31-4 and 2.6.32-10
saw this message already previously but not at this rate,
like 200x during
Subject: firmware: Re: Same Problem here
X-Mailer: reportbug 4.11
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:06:37 -0500
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.23
Severity: normal
File: firmware
Still same problem here. My wifi card is reported as
0e:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5300 AG
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
As mentioned in [1], the "vserver" featureset is planned to be removed
from the Debian linux kernel after the squeeze release. Debian suggests that
users consider migrating vserver systems to either the LXC (Linux Containers)
features of the upstream kernel
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:40:46PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> As long as there is a package in experimental with aufs support it's
> quite easy to get testing live CDs.
you have all the interest in cooperating with upstream for a real
unionfs instead of whining about aufs.
concerning 2.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: important
see in git ubuntu lucid
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
x86: Avoid race conditi
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
it looks like the following upstream commits lead to those repeated
messages, as soon as there's some traffic on the wireless network:
| [ 3538.284491] iwlagn :02:00.0: free more than tfds_in_queue (1:2)
| [ 3538.285838] iwlagn :0
On 18 March 2010 14:51, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:48 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.32-9
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>>
>> Linux 2.6.34 has the nouveau drm module required for running recent
>> nouveau X driver. The nouveau people abandoned U
includes repo up until 026c0e96af23,
as 2.6.32-10 broke on some archs, we might reupload soon,
maybe with that revision of openvz patch.
prebuild images, as usual:
http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-11_amd64.deb
http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/li
Thanks for the fast answer!
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:31:12PM -0300, Jorge Eduardo Birck wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Im having this error:
>>
>> "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
>>
>> In all my Debian Lenny machines, including production
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:25:07PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
> Version: 2.6.32-9
old version, please install 2.6.32-10, aka linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
and report back on it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:31:12PM -0300, Jorge Eduardo Birck wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Im having this error:
>
> "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
>
> In all my Debian Lenny machines, including production servers. I
> always use Debian and a never seen a kernel bug that make my servers
> freez
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:25:07PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
> Version: 2.6.32-9
>
> After installing this kernel my intel i965's i915 kms ain't working anymore
> Some infos:
Please send a full kernel log and output of lsmod and lspci. And please use
rep
Hello.
Im having this error:
"task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
In all my Debian Lenny machines, including production servers. I
always use Debian and a never seen a kernel bug that make my servers
freezes before. It makes all my infrastructure (debian and xen based)
go unstable.
This ha
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Version: 2.6.32-9
After installing this kernel my intel i965's i915 kms ain't working anymore
Some infos:
lors:~# cat /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf
options i915 modeset=1
lors:~#
With i915.modeset=1 on grub commandline:
pvanh...@lors:~$ dmesg | grep 915
[
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 574368 + pending
Bug #574368 [linux-2.6] FTBFS on alpha and hppa
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #574368 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stop
On 18 Mar 2010, b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Georg Borgström wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in
>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the
>> switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the proble
(Please CC on replies.)
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:05:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > PATA drivers of either flavour are mostly selected on a
> > > per-architecture basis, and no change has bee
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Georg Borgström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the
> switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the problem went away!
>
> With the switch I don't get "Not
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:05:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Replying to the list only; please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed)
>
> On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > PATA drivers of either flavour are mostly selected on a per-architecture
> > basis, and no change has been
(Replying to the list only; please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed)
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> PATA drivers of either flavour are mostly selected on a per-architecture
> basis, and no change has been made to non-x86. If people are willing to
> test on the non-x86 arc
Hi,
I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the
switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the problem went away!
With the switch I don't get "Not cloning cgroup for unused subsystem
ns" when starting chrome and no ugly "crash
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:10:52PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:03 +1100, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:19:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I'm sorry but I can't find the firmware for this anywhere.
> >
> > It is available in Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:03 +1100, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:19:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm sorry but I can't find the firmware for this anywhere.
>
> It is available in Greg Kroah-Hartman's linux-firmware tree [1]. From
> its WHENCE file:
>
> Add RealTek
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:48 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Linux 2.6.34 has the nouveau drm module required for running recent
> nouveau X driver. The nouveau people abandoned UMS so the KMS support is
> required to run the driver
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:01 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Re your blog post.
>
> > The libata transition for PATA (IDE) controller drivers. After some
> > review we realised that this only affects PC hardware at the moment, so
> > only users of the i386 or amd64 architectures will see the upgrade
> >
Hi,
You were correct - it's video related. I've narrowed it down to the module
intelfb
doing 'modprobe intelfb' recreates the system crash.
I can't upgrade the kernel until i sort out an issue with root on lvm on raid
with the initrd image that gets built automatically with the 2.6.32
stock ker
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: wishlist
Linux 2.6.34 has the nouveau drm module required for running recent
nouveau X driver. The nouveau people abandoned UMS so the KMS support is
required to run the driver at all and the module in 2.6.33 is too old
and there is none in 2.6.32.
Hi there,
This bug has been present for a long time, but now (with the latest
kernel) it seems worst.
I'm currently running 2.6.32-3-686-bigmem in a Squeeze/Sid mix. This is
a Latitude E6400 with battery and 90watt adapter; in my case, I have
never removed the battery.
For the last couple
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Mar 18 07:03:13 UTC 2010
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libcatalyst-devel-perl
> tags 573929 + pending
Bug #573929 [wnpp] ITP: libcataly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # does not affect stable
> tags 574401 + squeeze sid
Bug #574401 [linux-2.6] udevadm trigger crashes system
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
46 matches
Mail list logo