upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, If I try to boot 2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 on a 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (lenny) dom0, it gets stuck at: [0.120653] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/769 [0.120658] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0 [0.120663] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0 [0.120679]

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:56:25AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: If I try to boot 2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 on a 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (lenny) dom0, it gets stuck at: What was the last known working version? [0.120653] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/769 [0.120658] XENBUS: Device with no

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:56 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: Hi, If I try to boot 2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 on a 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (lenny) dom0, it gets stuck at: [0.120653] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/769 [0.120658] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0 [0.120663]

Bug#571980: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.33-2-amd64: impi oops on intel motherboard

2010-03-27 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 22:59 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : please report upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org with oops dmesg there and let us know bug nr so that it can be tracked. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15638 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: bug 571980 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

2010-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 571980 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15638 Bug #571980 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: Kernel oops when ipmi modules loaded on ibm 326m Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:02:01PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:56 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: [0.610445] blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled xen-blkfront is a module in the pvops based 2.6.32-x-xen-amd64 where as it was statically linked in the non-pvops

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 15:53 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:02:01PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:56 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: [0.610445] blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled xen-blkfront is a module in the pvops based 2.6.32-x-xen-amd64

Processed: tagging 575157

2010-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 575157 pending Bug #575157 [initramfs-tools] Calling `cpio` can produce error messages when working correctly Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:02:01PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: xen-blkfront is a module in the pvops based 2.6.32-x-xen-amd64 where as it was statically linked in the non-pvops 2.6.26-x-xen-and64 images. This already happened in Lenny for 32 bit guests (sort of) since the -686-bigmem kernel

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:56:25AM +0100, joy wrote: [0.610445] blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled done. Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ... done. Begin: Waiting for root file system ... Can anything be done? I thought the domUs were supposed to

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I missed Bastian's message as I'm not subscribed - please keep me in Cc:. Please add this to your muttrc then: | lists @lists.debian.org What was the last known working version? The one from lenny. Well, for some values of

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: What was the last known working version? The one from lenny. Well, for some values of working at least :) Well, Lenny have two variants. The early pv-ops and the oldstyle one. We had early pvops in lenny? Where? :) If you

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 17:10 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I extracted that initrd image now and I see lib/modules/2.6.32-4-xen-amd64/kernel/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.ko in it. Are you saying it could have gotten missed by the initrd init scripts even though it's there? I was saying it might

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 18:07 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: What was the last known working version? The one from lenny. Well, for some values of working at least :) Well, Lenny have two variants. The early pv-ops and the

Bug#565225: don't assume RESUME partition will never change

2010-03-27 Thread antoine
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.93.4 Severity: normal With swap on lvm, /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume containing UUID prevented the system to resume changing back to dev/mapper (/dev/mapper/vg0-swap) allowed my system to resume from hibernate As my problem appears linked to this /etc

Bug#575630: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: Intel wifi does not save power any more

2010-03-27 Thread Stefan Monnier
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.4 Severity: normal I recently switched to the new 2.6.33 kernel because of its support for the TRIM command for my SSD disk, but it turns out that it has one very serious regression: its iwl3945 driver seems not to provide any power-saving any

Re: upgrade to new xen domU on old xen dom0?

2010-03-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:11:15PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: OK, that works, thanks. We have got to get this documented somewhere now that the deprecated option is broken. There is no mention of it at http://wiki.debian.org/Xen and simple googling is far from conclusive. Would you mind

Re: Bug#575648: Lots of udevd --daemon running 100% CPU all the time.

2010-03-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
reassign 575648 linux-2.6 forcemerge 572537 575648 thanks On Mar 27, leonardo.fava...@email.it wrote: Running htop I can see many udevd --daemon entries. Most of them are running 0.0% whilst the top two are runnin 90/100% of both cpus. If I stop the top two they restart and reach the 100%

Processed: Re: Bug#575648: Lots of udevd --daemon running 100% CPU all the time.

2010-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 575648 linux-2.6 Bug #575648 [udev] Lots of udevd --daemon running 100% CPU all the time. Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'. forcemerge 572537 575648 Bug#572537: udev spins on drm device Bug#575648: Lots of udevd --daemon

Bug#575630: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: Intel wifi does not save power any more)

2010-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:29:24 + with message-id 1269732564.8653.160.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#575630: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: Intel wifi does not save power any more has caused the Debian Bug report #575630, regarding linux-image-2.6.33-2-686: Intel wifi does

Bug#575660: With last kernels, terminal/console processing getting worth.

2010-03-27 Thread Regid Ichira
Package: linux-source-2.6.32 Version: 2.6.32-9 Severity: normal I am making my own kernels out of Debian's linux-source. I upgraded the source from 32-5 to 32-9. I have added a few more kernel modules with 32-9. I believe the config diff is not relevant for this report. 1) With 32-9, when

Processed: tagging 575660

2010-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 575660 moreinfo Bug #575660 [linux-source-2.6.32] With last kernels, terminal/console processing getting worth. Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#575660: With last kernels, terminal/console processing getting worth.

2010-03-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 03:08 +0200, Regid Ichira wrote: Package: linux-source-2.6.32 Version: 2.6.32-9 Severity: normal I am making my own kernels out of Debian's linux-source. I upgraded the source from 32-5 to 32-9. I have added a few more kernel modules with 32-9. I believe the