Bug#582481: initramfs-tools: System won't boot anymore if it was encrypted by debian squeeze setup

2010-05-21 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Andre Pawlowski wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.94.4 > Severity: important > > > This bugreport was written with the initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64.bak before > updating yesterday > to initramfs-tools 0.94.4. I have an encrytped lvm which contains every > par

Bug#542275: hwclock should not try to calculate the drift if rtc time is invalid [was: Re: Bug#542275: kernel error message for #542275 + patch]

2010-05-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 15:43:29 Benjamin Cama wrote: > So, the correct command in this context would be (see #478663) : > # hwclock --systohc --noadjfile --utc > > But it took me some hard time to find it ... Benjamin & Ben, Thanks for this. I was having the same issue with a ibook G4, t

Processed: reassign 508289 to wicd

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 508289 wicd Bug #508289 [nfs-common] [nfs-common] mount nfs at boot fails when insserv with shell or startpar concurrency is enabled Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-common' to 'wicd'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/

Processed: tagging 579397, bug 579397 is forwarded to linux-...@vger.kernel.org

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 579397 upstream Bug #579397 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: statd wont't work without reverse lookups, mountd won't allow ip-based exports with reverse lookups Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 579397 linux-...@vger.kernel.org Bug #5

Bug#579397: STAT_FAIL to debian for SM_MON of 192.168.120.254, No canonical hostname found for 192.168.120.254

2010-05-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 07:49 +0800, Steven Shiau wrote: > Same problem here. However, mine is on the client side. > On sid system, running kernel is 2.6.32-5-686, nfs-common is 1:1.2.2-1. > When I mount my NFS server 192.168.120.254, it works. However, if I want > to use some tool which need to lo

Bug#579397: STAT_FAIL to debian for SM_MON of 192.168.120.254, No canonical hostname found for 192.168.120.254

2010-05-21 Thread Steven Shiau
Same problem here. However, mine is on the client side. On sid system, running kernel is 2.6.32-5-686, nfs-common is 1:1.2.2-1. When I mount my NFS server 192.168.120.254, it works. However, if I want to use some tool which need to lock file to save the file on the NFS server, e.g. vgcfgbackup

Processed: tagging 571251

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 571251 - moreinfo Bug #571251 [linux-2.6] base: hp pavillon won't start (30% success) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 571251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Processed: bug 571251 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14716

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 571251 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14716 Bug #571251 [linux-2.6] base: hp pavillon won't start (30% success) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14716'. > thanks Stopping processi

Processed: tagging 578262

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 578262 + pending Bug #578262 [linux-2.6] iwlwifi compatibility problem with non-QoS APs Bug #578263 [linux-2.6] iwlwifi compatibility problem with non-QoS APs Added

Bug#578262: Intel 5300 wireless does not work on Acer, TravelMate6293.

2010-05-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:45 +0200, Zdeněk Matěj wrote: > Thank you for your replay. > > I applied the supplied patches: > > 0001-mac80211-explicitly-disable-enable-QoS.patch > 0002-iwlwifi-manage-QoS-by-mac-stack.patch [...] > If I understand the patches correctly, the 0002...patch removes a "voi

Processed: bug 582275 is forwarded to linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org, tagging 582275

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 582275 linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org Bug #582275 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.4-686: ext3 filesystem corruption with md RAID1 on Seagate disks Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org'. > tags 582275 moreinfo

Bug#582275: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.4-686: ext3 filesystem corruption with md RAID1 on Seagate disks

2010-05-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:50 +0200, Reiner Buehl wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-11~bpo50+1 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > I keep getting ext3 filesystem corruptions on one of my md RAID1 > arrays. Shortly after booting, I get messages like the foll

Processed: tagging 582487

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 582487 moreinfo Bug #582487 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad page state Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 582487: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#582487: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad page state

2010-05-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:15 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-12 > Severity: normal > > Cheers! > > Thiemo > > [ 3587.353975] BUG: Bad page state in process 10_linux pfn:352fe > [ 3587.353996] page:c1b67fc0 flags:4000 count:0 mapcount:-9835008 > mapping:(nul

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Promised utility now available

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Bug #582281 [linux-source-2.6.32] Partition starting sector and partition > size calculated incorrectly for reserved CMS minidisk on FBA DASD with > blocksize > 512 using DIAG driver (s390 architecture only) > # Bug reassigned from package 'li

Processed: Re: Promised utility now available

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 582281 linux-2.6 Bug #582281 [linux-source-2.6.32] Partition starting sector and partition size calculated incorrectly for reserved CMS minidisk on FBA DASD with blocksize > 512 using DIAG driver (s390 architecture only) Bug reassigned

Bug#582281: Promised utility now available

2010-05-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
reassign 582281 linux-2.6 tags 582281 + upstream quit Stephen Powell wrote: > Now, how do you want to work this? Do you (the Debian Kernel Team) > want to function as an intermediary between me and upstream? > Or would you prefer that I report the problem to upstream myself? I am not the kernel

Bug#582107: NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically

2010-05-21 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
>> The result is that mounting ordinary version 3 filesystems fails with EPERM. > > I can't reproduce this. Neither can I -- it now appears to work without the vers=3. Sorry for the noise. Juliusz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@list

Bug#582107: marked as done (NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically)

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 22:14:02 +0200 with message-id <7ieih5qagl@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#582107: NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically has caused the Debian Bug report #582107, regarding NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fal

Bug#582281: Promised utility now available

2010-05-21 Thread Stephen Powell
As promised in my original post, I have written a little utility program to zap the disk labels of minidisks corrupted by this bug. Running it against all affected disks will allow existing data to be accessed safely by both types of Linux kernels: those that have the bug and those that have the f

Bug#580149: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: usb - sata > Sense not available

2010-05-21 Thread maximilian attems
tags 580149 moreinfo stop On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:56:48AM +0200, formin...@t-online.hu wrote: > > More information. > > The usb mouse works fine on PCI USB 2.0 Host Controller Card > (4-Ext, 1-Int. Ports) > but the usb storage (DataTraveler), and the USB-SATA > converter does not work. could

Processed: Re: Bug#580149: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: usb - sata > Sense not available

2010-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 580149 moreinfo Bug #580149 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: usb - sata > Sense not available Added tag(s) moreinfo. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 580149: http://bugs.debian.org/cg

Bug#580149: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: usb - sata > Sense not available

2010-05-21 Thread formind22
More information. The usb mouse works fine on PCI USB 2.0 Host Controller Card (4-Ext, 1-Int. Ports) but the usb storage (DataTraveler), and the USB-SATA converter does not work. Ggreetings -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Bug#582487: addendum

2010-05-21 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Maybe to avoid confusion I should add that during the time of reporting the bug, I had 2.6.32-13 already installed, but not rebooted yet. The bug applies to 2.6.32-12. Cheers! Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#582487: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad page state

2010-05-21 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-12 Severity: normal Cheers! Thiemo [ 3587.353975] BUG: Bad page state in process 10_linux pfn:352fe [ 3587.353996] page:c1b67fc0 flags:4000 count:0 mapcount:-9835008 mapping:(null) index:bfffe [ 3587.354013] Pid: 9401, comm: 10_linux Not tainted 2.6.32-5-

Bug#581353: System badly crashes completely

2010-05-21 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Hi Max, On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:27:02PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > There is nothing related. I reported a bug on 2.6.32-9 because it > > happened there. I can't run a newer kernel, i.e. 2.6.32-12, > > 2.6.32-9 is old an