Bug#586886: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load nvidia.ko nor nv.ko

Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) I downloaded the latest nvidia graphic card driver 195.xx.xx. However, linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 can not load nvidia.ko generated after running nvidia-195.xx.xx.run fro

Bug#586886: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load nvidia.ko nor nv.ko)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:33:43 +0200 with message-id <20100623093343.ga19...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> and subject line Re: Bug#586886: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load nvidia.ko nor nv.ko has caused the Debian Bug report #586886, regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load

Bug#586913: linux-image-2.6.34-1-amd64: fix to qcserial to allow uploading of firmware

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi there is a problem with qcserial since ... 2.6.32 I think - there is currently a regression bug. Seems like there was a change in the fifo the new method doesn't handle frmware uploads well There is a patch

Bug#586913: linux-image-2.6.34-1-amd64: fix to qcserial to allow uploading of firmware

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:44:03PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi > > there is a problem with qcserial since ... 2.6.32 I think - there is > currently a regression bug. Seems like there was a change in the

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:55:38 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Stephen Powell recently reminded the kernel team that LILO is not > automatically updated on installation of a new kernel version in lenny. > In fact there is a general problem that there are several different ways > a boot loader

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:42AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:55:38 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > > In case 1, the boot loader should also be called by update-initramfs > > when it is called outside of kernel package installation and removal. > > This is norma

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:04:06 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote: > > yaird is no longer present in testing or unstable, so it is a non-issue > as far as I'm concerned. I see it is gone from testing, but it is still present in unstable, as of this moment, according to the Debian web site. -- .'

Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

It doesn't seem to work on 2.6.34. See attachment. I had no problems on 2.6.32-5 yet. Regards, Pitxyoki rndis_wlan - 2.6.34-1 (without rndis_host patch) Description: Binary data

Programme Marrakech 04 jours/03 nuits !

Bonjour Je vous invite à consulter l'article : http://comfortplusmaroc.blog4ever.com/blog/lire-article-34561-94856-programme_marrakech_03_nuits__04_jours.html Bienvenue à Marrakech Ibtissam DERRAZ Assistante de direction COMFORT PLUS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.d

RE: How to apt-get install new kernel 2.6.34 on debian ?

Thank you very much. _ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:04

Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote: My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55 . If I unload the 3c59x module, I can no longer reproduce this problem, and wireless is stable. W

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:20:59AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:04:06 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > yaird is no longer present in testing or unstable, so it is a non-issue > > as far as I'm concerned. > > I see it is gone from testing, but it is still present

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:42AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: That does seem like a more general-purpose solution, rather than having lilo and zipl treated as special cases. But please keep the appropriate parties informed of any future design changes to update-initramfs. I myself have never

Bug#586381: initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs fails with non-gzipped initramfs images

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 11:08 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > > could you please provide output of: > > > dd if=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.33 bs=1 count=8 | od Attached. > I'm not sure whether file catches lzma at all (dd/od won't help > either, but we're investigating our possibilities). Argl.. yeah

Bug#586381: initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs fails with non-gzipped initramfs images

ahh... I've just seen that this issue in libmagic has already been reported (#576950), actually by myself ^^, and there seems to be a solution,... Cheers, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Processed: tagging 574555

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 574555 - moreinfo patch Bug #574555 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: 2.6.32 kernel oops: Pid: 1700, comm: irq/21-b43 Not tainted 2.6.32-3-amd64 Removed tag(s) moreinfo and patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: submitter 586967

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 586967 Arne Nordmark Bug #586967 [linux-2.6] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101 Changed Bug submitter to 'Arne Nordmark ' from 'Ben Hutchings ' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Processed: tagging 586967

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 586967 + pending Bug #586967 [linux-2.6] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101 Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#586967: Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

Forwarded Message From: Arne Nordmark To: Ben Hutchings Cc: 574...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:12:08 +0200 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wr

Bug#586967: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-12 Severity: important Forwarded Message From: Arne Nordmark To: 574...@bugs.debian.org Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101 Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 12:37:10 +0200 I find a similar oops very reliably whenever there

Bug#586967: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

Forwarded Message From: Arne Nordmark To: 574...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:40:20 +0200 My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55

Bug#586967: Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 21:12 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote: > >> My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55 > >> . If I > >> unload the 3c59x

Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > Possibily you are right. :) > It seems to be working for 2.6.32. I'll compile 2.6.34 today or > tomorrow without the patch and see if it also works. Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in release cand

Bug#584945: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: rtl8192s_usb: Fix device ID table

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are > > actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove > > them from rtl8192s_usb, and add mor

Processed: tagging 584549

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 584549 + pending Bug #584549 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: please enable CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > > Please do test that as soon as possible.  This change is included in > release candidates for 2.6.35 and will need to be reverted there as well > if it caused this regressi

Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 02:09 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > > > > Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in > > release candidates for 2.

Processed: tagging 586494

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 586494 - moreinfo Bug #586494 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 586494: http://bugs.

Bug#584549: linux-2.6: please enable CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6

On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 13:26 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > netdev wasn't particularly interested, but Julius Volz, the author of > this code directed me to the lvs-users mailing list. Nobody reported > any problem since then, but I got a success report, see > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.

Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, trouble daemon wrote: > Ben, > > > Another option that may be worth trying is 'noapic'. > > Wow, that worked just fine actually on 2.6.26 stock kernel. Thanks a lot! > > I am curious though, what in the world changed since 2.6.18 and lower > versions that might

Bug#551101: marked as done (cannot kill processes trying to open defective CD-ROM)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:35:19 +0100 with message-id <1277343319.26161.101.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#551101: still exists has caused the Debian Bug report #551101, regarding cannot kill processes trying to open defective CD-ROM to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Please can you confirm or correct the following summary of your results > so far: > > Debian 2.6.32-15: fails to pass traffic Correct. > Debian 2.6.32-15 with patch reverted: good I had no crashes since Monday (June 21st). So, apparently ye

Processed: tagging 584881

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 584881 moreinfo Bug #584881 [linux-2.6] Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) resync/check implicated Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 584881: http://bugs.debian.org/cg

Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) resync/check implicated

On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:11 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) > resync/check implicated"): > > We really need to see the kernel messages reporting soft-lockup. > > There aren't any. Or, if there are, it isn't printing them t

Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm afraid I don't know much about interrupt routing so I don't think I > can get useful information out of it. That's okay, the important thing is that noapic works at least. > I see that you also wrote to LKML and that you found an older