Bug#575727: marked as done ([linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:00:42 +0100 with message-id <1280206842.13192.16.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re; [linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share has caused the Debian Bug report #575727, regarding [linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share to be marked as

Processed: tagging 590532

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 590532 + pending Bug #590532 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: IDE DMA doesn't work in pata_pdc202xx_old Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping proces

Bug#590532: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: IDE DMA doesn't work in pata_pdc202xx_old

2010-07-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 05:34 +0200, Michal Pokrywka wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-18 > Severity: normal > > > When using 2.6.32-5-686 Linux kernel (package version 2.6.32-18) IDE > controller > doesn't seem to be using DMA (about 4MB/sec from hdparm disk read). > When booted older

Bug#588770: (no subject)

2010-07-26 Thread Matthias Berndt
Well, i just set modules=dep back to modules=most. It makes my initramfs a bit bigger, oh well... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007270556.24023

Bug#590532: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: IDE DMA doesn't work in pata_pdc202xx_old

2010-07-26 Thread Michal Pokrywka
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal When using 2.6.32-5-686 Linux kernel (package version 2.6.32-18) IDE controller doesn't seem to be using DMA (about 4MB/sec from hdparm disk read). When booted older kernel 2.6.32-3-686 which uses old ide modules, promise IDE works flawlessly

Bug#590524: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: MacBook Pro fails to boot with "ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 -- -- ]"

2010-07-26 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal Hi, When I tried to boot my MacBook Pro, it prompted me for the passphrase for my root partition. I entered this passphrase and the boot continued. About 40 seconds into the boot, a blank line was displayed, followed by a line containing a

Re: CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set for linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64

2010-07-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 01:04 +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote: > Hi > > I am not on the list, so please forgive me and put me in CC :) > I'm trying to boot an Ubuntu Lucid from linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 > through the Xen 4.0.1-rc3 hypervisor ( also Debian packages ), which > boots fine, but then fai

CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set for linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64

2010-07-26 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hi I am not on the list, so please forgive me and put me in CC :) I'm trying to boot an Ubuntu Lucid from linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 through the Xen 4.0.1-rc3 hypervisor ( also Debian packages ), which boots fine, but then fails to show me the console: [ 12.408078] initcall xenfs_init+0x0/

Re: Ubuntu+BFS

2010-07-26 Thread Daniel Hollocher
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:17 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:53:57PM -0400, Daniel Hollocher wrote: >> Hey folks, >> I'm not confident that this is the right list to ask.  Someone >> suggested this list, but if I should post in Ubuntu land lists, let me >> know. > > Is your go

Re: Ubuntu+BFS

2010-07-26 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:53:57PM -0400, Daniel Hollocher wrote: > Hey folks, > I'm not confident that this is the right list to ask. Someone > suggested this list, but if I should post in Ubuntu land lists, let me > know. Is your goal to create a kernel package w/ the Ubuntu source to run on *D

Ubuntu+BFS

2010-07-26 Thread Daniel Hollocher
Hey folks, I'm not confident that this is the right list to ask. Someone suggested this list, but if I should post in Ubuntu land lists, let me know. I am working on a linux package [0] that consists of the Ubuntu kernel patched with the ck patches [1]. Right now, I do this in a seemingly hackis

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-26 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #575727 (http://bugs.debian.org/575727) # * https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian

Bug#581830: what worked for me

2010-07-26 Thread K
I built a libre kernel, and nouveau worked on a legacy card but not on a 6200 card. I've seen another problem with the 6 series and its NV40 architecture. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Bug#590480: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: webcam does not work with gspca driver

2010-07-26 Thread Marco Bajo
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-15 Severity: important Webcam worked before the dist-upgrade from Lenny (with drivers found at: http://mxhaard.free.fr/download.html). Now the drivers are loaded but webcam does not work. lsmod | grep gspca : gspca_vc032x 21444 0 gspca_main

Bug#534545: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: Getting the same issue on a plain debian lenny

2010-07-26 Thread Sascha Retter
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24 Followup-For: Bug #534545 I am getting the same issue on a plain debian lenny installation. It comes to an kernel panic when formatting 1,5 TB raid1. A kernel panic also occurs if copying a huge amount of data >20 GB to a non-raid 1,5 TB disk. Harddisks a

Bug#590479: PANIC/OOPS: "Virtual device eth0.XXX asks to queue packet" on cable removal

2010-07-26 Thread Christian Svensson
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-15 Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-15) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:34:03 UTC 2010 ** Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64 root=

Bug#584784: [PATCH] mips: Set io_map_base for several PCI bridges lacking it

2010-07-26 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:22:59PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Several MIPS platforms don't set pci_controller::io_map_base for their > PCI bridges. This results in a panic in pci_iomap(). (The panic is > conditional on CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS, but that is now enabled for all PCI > MIPS systems.) >

Firmware realtek + Debian amd64 = kernel panic

2010-07-26 Thread Berillions
Hello, I have a big problem with my wifi chipset on Debian 64. To configure my wifi, i installed the package "firmware-realtek" to install the firmware for my chipset wifi = realtek 8192e. After to install the firmware and wireless-tools/wpasupplicant, i edit "interface" file in /etc/network like

Bug#586303: linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64: Kernel Bug after upgrade from 2.6.32-3 to 2.6.32-5

2010-07-26 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, I was hit by the same bug. I have also a "bonding-vlan-bridge" setup. After installing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-18_amd64.deb (and linux-base_2.6.32-18_all.deb) from unstable the "NULL pointer dereference" is gone. Thank you for the good work :-) -- greetings eMHa signature.a

Bug#573144: fyi

2010-07-26 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, there were two changes for i915 in 2.6.35-rc6 that could be related to this bug. drm/i915: enable low power render writes on GEN3 hardware. [1] drm/i915: Define MI_ARB_STATE bits [2] Regards, Stefan [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=944001201c

Bug#577640: closed by maximilian attems (Re: Bug#577640: Another oops + repost)

2010-07-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
> From: maximilian attems > To: 577640-d...@bugs.debian.org > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:10:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: Bug#577640: Another oops + repost > Version: 2.6.35-rc6 > aboves version is sitting in NEW should hit archive soon, thus closing. > thanks for report. Beware: after testing this, I

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#590438: Should pre-depend on awk

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 590438 Bug #590438 {Done: maximilian attems } [initramfs-tools] Should pre-depend on awk > reassign 590438 apt Bug #590438 [initramfs-tools] Should pre-depend on awk Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'apt'. Bug No longer mar

Bug#590438: Should pre-depend on awk

2010-07-26 Thread Bastian Blank
reopen 590438 reassign 590438 apt retitle 590438 apt - Removes pseudo-essential package On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:23:52PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:28:58AM +0200, Benjamin Renard wrote: > > Package: initramfs-tools > > Version: 0.92o > > Severity: serious > wron

Bug#590438: marked as done (Should pre-depend on awk)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:52 +0200 with message-id <20100726102352.gk19...@baikonur.stro.at> and subject line Re: Bug#590438: Should pre-depend on awk has caused the Debian Bug report #590438, regarding Should pre-depend on awk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#590438: Should pre-depend on awk

2010-07-26 Thread Benjamin Renard
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92o Severity: serious Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: aspell* aspell-fr* at* bash-completion* console-setup* console-terminus* dc* debian-faq* dictionari

Bug#577640: Another oops + repost

2010-07-26 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Martín Ferrari writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 18:43, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: > >>> First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this >>> problem  that got kinda lost in the thread: >> >> I can't reproduce this on 2.6.35-rc1+ >> >> Can you please test a 2.6.35-rc v

Bug#589989: marked as done (Kernel panic after few seconds of booting)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:48:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#589989: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #589989, regarding Kernel panic after few seconds of booting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#545125: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:48:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#534422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #534422, regarding linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk to be marked

Bug#576800: marked as done (libc6: Cannot create new processes after hibernating)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:48:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#534422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #534422, regarding libc6: Cannot create new processes after hibernating to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#545517: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:48:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#534422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #534422, regarding linux-image-2.6.31-rc6-amd64: freeze and on-disk corruption with KMS and suspend-to-disk to be marked

Bug#577640: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64: Kernel warnings in netns thread)

2010-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:10:04 +0200 with message-id <20100726071003.gi19...@baikonur.stro.at> and subject line Re: Bug#577640: Another oops + repost has caused the Debian Bug report #577640, regarding linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64: Kernel warnings in netns thread to be marked as done.