Bug#605636: Please enable CONFIG_FANOTIFY in 2.6.37(-rcX)

2010-12-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 17:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Ben > > On 02.12.2010 07:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> please consider enabling fanotify in the upcoming 2.6.37(-rcX) packages. > >> > >> Systemd has a readahead implementation based on fanotify which we would > >> like to enable. > >

Bug#602109: Acknowledgement ([linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0)

2010-12-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi there, > > today I updated to linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 and > recognized that I have a couple of modprobe processes still running after > booting: [...] Please can you log information about the state of tasks by

Processed: reassign 602292 to kernel-wedge ...

2010-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 602292 kernel-wedge Bug #602292 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] Squeeze disk detection failed on MacBook Air 11.6" Bug #600305 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: MacBookPro 7, 1 mcp89 sata link reset fails, no disks d

Bug#602292: Squeeze disk detection failed on MacBook Air 11.6"

2010-12-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 22:57 +0100, mike dentifrice wrote: > > > same problem? > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600305 > > > > Very likely, thanks for the pointer. However, this should be solved > > with the last installer which includes version 2.6.32-27 of the Linux > > kern

Bug#605756: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Can't burn CD-R media on 2.6.32-5, can burn CDRW. Both work if 2.6.26-2 booted

2010-12-02 Thread Louis B. Moore
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-28 Severity: important Under lenny with 2.6.26-2-amd64 I can write both CD-R and CD-RW media on the Pioneer and Plextor drives on my system. Upgraded to squeeze and 2.6.32-5-amd64 and I can no longer write CD-R but I can write CD-RW. I can write CD-Rs with 2.6.26

Bug#603632: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present (Was: Re: Bug#603632: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting fine on bare metal, but not

2010-12-02 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 12/02/2010 03:47 PM, Vincent Caron wrote: > It just happens that your kernel above (2.6.32-27+numa1) boots fine > under hypervisor _when_ passed 'numa=noacpi'. Yeah ! > > I then tried again with Debian Squeeze's latest 2.6.32-28, which > crashes as -27 under hypervisor (and changelog show no

Bug#602109: Acknowledgement ([linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0)

2010-12-02 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, today I updated to linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 and recognized that I have a couple of modprobe processes still running after booting: root 966 0.2 0.0 2308 800 ?Shttp://lists.debian.org/201012022200.43301.w...@cyconet.org

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-12-02 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #604472 (http://bugs.debian.org/604472) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi

Bug#605636: Please enable CONFIG_FANOTIFY in 2.6.37(-rcX)

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Ben On 02.12.2010 07:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> please consider enabling fanotify in the upcoming 2.6.37(-rcX) packages. >> >> Systemd has a readahead implementation based on fanotify which we would >> like to enable. > > There seem to be alternate ways of doing readahead, Are you referring

Bug#605648: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#605648: linux 2.6.32-27: page allocation failure (ath9k related?))

2010-12-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:09 -0500, Graham wrote: [...] > > problem with 'oops' messages on a standard VGA text console. > > Indeed. I don't understand why /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf is > shipped as part of X.org. I don't have X installed on this machine. > Maybe this file should be moved to the

Bug#605648: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#605648: linux 2.6.32-27: page allocation failure (ath9k related?))

2010-12-02 Thread Graham
> This means your system ran very short of memory and was unable to > allocate memory to handle incoming network traffic.  This may be related > to whatever you were doing with the disk you attached shortly before. > Assuming the system continued to work after this low-memory condition, > this is n

Bug#601187: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please apply patch for shared I/O region support

2010-12-02 Thread Mike Hommey
Is the following going to be considered for squeeze? Thanks, Mike On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:55:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-26 > Severity: wishlist > > This is a followup from bug 597820. I would like to get the watchdog > support for f71889fg with a sq

Bug#567996: Copying files to USB pendrive is very slow

2010-12-02 Thread Paul Szczepanek
I have the same problem, copying files to flash drives is slow (100KB/s) running Squeeze 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-27). I have the same controller: 00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Con

Bug#605673: linux-2.6: 2.6.26-2-amd64 KVM host crash at kvm:gfn_to_rmap+0x17/0x49

2010-12-02 Thread Eneko Lacunza
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important System was rebooted 3 days ago. There are about 8 virtual machines. One of them was doing heavy I/O during the crash. After a cold-reboot everything worked ok and the heavy I/O task has been re-run and completed successfully. Syslog: Dec 2 10:53:40 cam