Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29
Severity: normal
File: acpi-cpufreq
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-29) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Fri Dec 10 17:41:50 UTC 2010
** Command line:
placeholder root
My CPU is an intel core i3 540, and the speedstep option is activated in the
bios.
Hi,
thanks for your report. I get the same behavior:
overlord3:~$ sudo modprobe acpi-cpufreq
FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-xen-amd64/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
No such device
overlord3:~$ dpkg-query -W linux-image-$(uname -r)
linux-image-2.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 608240 important
Bug #608240 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt] linux-image-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt:
USB subsystem crashes causing EXT3 buffer I/O error and data loss on MIPS system
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stoppi
On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX
> kernel from experimental?
>
> The kernel is available from packages.debian.org. If the error can
> still be reproduced, we should report it upstream.
Unfortunately, 2.6.37-rc7-amd64 has
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:07:22 +
with message-id <1293631642.2928.115.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#608250: acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
module: No such device
has caused the Debian Bug report #608250,
regarding acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 03:55 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote:
> On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX
> > kernel from experimental?
> >
> > The kernel is available from packages.debian.org. If the error can
> > still be reproduc
Even in dom0 ?
How could i control my CPU speed then ?
> ok, does it happen if you boot the livecd under qemu?
I just tested it. Booting the DVD ISO in qemu took more than 20 minutes to get
to a console prompt. My usual setting is Debian Live on a USB flash drive with
a "live-rw" persistency partition. This setup boots from the USB flash drive
in a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 608185 + security
Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only
triggered by root
Added tag(s) security.
> severity 608185 serious
Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only
triggered b
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 21:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Package: btrfs-tools
> Version: 0.19+20100601-3, 0.19+20101101-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Balance tree action of btrfs command should be limited to only root
> user, because it may cause data corrupt
Why would it cause corruption?
> and usually
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 15:13 +0100, Timothée GROS wrote:
> Even in dom0 ?
Yes - dom0 has access to most physical devices but *not* physical CPUs.
> How could i control my CPU speed then ?
That would have to be done in the Xen hypervisor, not the dom0 kernel.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job i
Filesystem rebalancing (BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE) affects the entire
filesystem and may run uninterruptibly for a long time. This does not
seem to be something that an unprivileged user should be able to do.
Reported-by: Aron Xu
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |4
1 files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 608185 + patch
Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only
triggered by root
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
608185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:49, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 21:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Balance tree action of btrfs command should be limited to only root
>> user, because it may cause data corrupt
>
> Why would it cause corruption?
>
It shouldn't cause corruption if it always
2010/12/29 Uwe Kleine-König :
> Hello Aron,
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:31:41PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> I think a workaround (geteuid test) is needed to be settled in
>> btrfs-tools, but not just wait for a kernel change.
> if you want to stop people doing bad things by accident, OK, but a
> ge
Hello Aron,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:31:41PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> I think a workaround (geteuid test) is needed to be settled in
> btrfs-tools, but not just wait for a kernel change.
if you want to stop people doing bad things by accident, OK, but a
geteuid test won't stop people that want to
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
Just in case, I am at 27C3 now, with my laptop, so if anyone there
wants to directly investigate the issue just let me know.
--
Nicolas LIMARE
http://nicolas.limare.net/
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The system randomly (say, 2 times every 3 boots) shows General Protection Fault
errors at boot time. I don't get to multiuser init levels.
When those errors occur, I can't do anything, the system seem
Hello Greeting from Francisca
My Name is Francisca
I fill like to know you
Because journey of thousand
Miles started with a step
Also true love and likeness
Is just like a magic.
And only but a day people use to know each others.
My Father’s name is Johnson and my Mother’s is Name how ever Rose
Hello Greeting from Francisca
My Name is Francisca
I fill like to know you
Because journey of thousand
Miles started with a step
Also true love and likeness
Is just like a magic.
And only but a day people use to know
each others.
My Father’s name is Johnson and my
Mother’s is Name h
Ronny Standtke writes:
> I just tested it. Booting the DVD ISO in qemu took more than 20 minutes to
> get
How much RAM did you assign to the virtualized machine? I think the
default is 128MB.
> I did not experience the system hang in this one single qemu test run (I also
> do not run into the
On 12/29/2010 09:10 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 03:55 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote:
>> On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX
>>> kernel from experimental?
>>>
>>> The kernel is available from packages.deb
On 12/27/2010 09:36 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Grub command lines are identical except that "lapic hpet=force" in
normal boot is substituted by "single" in recovery mode.
I've found that if i remove "lapic" from the command line, then the NMI
error appears. And in fact that paramter it's not p
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 14:05 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 09:10 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 03:55 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote:
> >> On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >>> Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX
> >>> kernel
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 17:12 +0100, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-29
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
This does *not* break the whole system - the package works for other
people and even you are able to reboot into another kernel versio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 608278 important
Bug #608278 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Random general protection
faults at boot
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi Andrea,
Your kernel Oops shows a very similar stack trace to the rtl8187 problem
I reported in 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 2.6.32-2, which would be followed by
tasks locking up and then the whole system crashing:
http://bugs.debian.org/596649
In my situation this would only happen after several hou
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: normal
Similar to #582858, however for me it still does not work.
When I set MODULES=dep, root cannot be found as the root mountpoint
device does not start with '^/dev/' (thanks to my symlinking /etc/mtab
to /proc/mounts I also get two /'s also):
output of
Hi again,
Andrea said the issue wasn't reproducible in "2.6.32-3-amd64". Does
this mean Debian package version 2.6.32-9? (cat /proc/version)
I definitely saw the rtl8187 bug in 2.6.32-21, so I would guess this bug
was introduced in -12 or -10 when most of the changes to rtl818x or
mac80211 code
> How much RAM did you assign to the virtualized machine? I think the
> default is 128MB.
I gave the virtual machine 800 MB RAM on a host with 2 GB RAM.
> Sure, I was just asking if there would be something I could easily
> test here. I don't have a machine with cdrom drive easily accessible
> (m
31 matches
Mail list logo
