Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-02 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi Ian! Am 02.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Ian Campbell: > Did -28 work OK? Otherwise what was the last known good kernel? The -29 kernel was the one that was installed when I've setup Squeeze. So, there was never a different kernel on that system. Anyway... I can try -28 and see what happens. > The

Bug#597658: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64: Missing aesni-intel module in kernel

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > > Please can you test whether aesni-intel loads and works in: > > > > 1. Package version 2.6.32-12 > > . This wa

Bug#597658: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64: Missing aesni-intel module in kernel

2011-01-02 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:41 +0100, cfchris6 wrote: > > What has to be done until the proposed solution to blacklist the module > > could > > be implemented? > > > > I do think that it is not very nice to have a big part of those wit

Bug#607495: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: kernel freeze

2011-01-02 Thread Philip Ashmore
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Philip Ashmore writes: I'd recommend also attaching your hardware information, or trying it Not sure how much this matters under xen really but the cpuinfo in dom0 has What I really meant was your hardware device info. I can reproduce this bug on Lenny running th

Bug#602078: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64: Wake-up does a full restart !)

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:30:48 + with message-id <1294011048.3167.134.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#602078: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64: Wake-up does a full restart ! has caused the Debian Bug report #602078, regarding linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64: Wake-up does a

Processed: bug 602078 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23002

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 602078 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23002 Bug #602078 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64: Wake-up does a full restart ! Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#602078 to the same value > thanks

Processed: retitle 607879 to aufs: kernel BUG at .../mm/mmap.c:873

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 607879 aufs: kernel BUG at .../mm/mmap.c:873 Bug #607879 [linux-2.6] System hangs up with mmap.c:873! Changed Bug title to 'aufs: kernel BUG at .../mm/mmap.c:873' from 'System hangs up with mmap.c:873! ' > thanks Stopping processing here

Processed: owner 607879

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 607879 debian-l...@lists.debian.org Bug #607879 [linux-2.6] System hangs up with mmap.c:873! Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607879: http://bu

Bug#607879: System hangs up with mmap.c:873!

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
The Debian kernel team really doesn't like to support aufs; we include it only to support Debian Live. Therefore I'm passing this bug over to the Debian Live maintainers. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This

Processed: tagging 608185

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 608185 + pending Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processi

Bug#599368: Bug#608138: initramfs-tools: NMI error on boot only in recovery mode

2011-01-02 Thread Cesare Leonardi
On 01/02/2011 11:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Yes, I see, it doesn't say that this is a fatal error for watchdog initialisation. I've seen just now the patch (v1 and v2) you sent upstream: thank you very much for improving the error message and the documentation. Very very appreciated. Cesar

Bug#599368: [PATCH v2] watchdog: Improve initialisation error message and documentation

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...' does not make it clear that this is a fatal error for the watchdog. It also currently prints the error value as a pointer, rather than extracting the error code with PTR_ERR(). Fix that. Add a note to the description of the 'nowatc

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 15:42 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Ok!, I did more or less the things you told me. I was not able to > patch the source in a standard way; but I changed the source code by > hand, I recompile the kernel and I used the resulting module with > insmod rt2870.ko

Bug#599368: Bug#608138: initramfs-tools: NMI error on boot only in recovery mode

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 23:37 +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote: > On 01/02/2011 10:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> Then add +1 to what Michael Biebl already asked: why that message should > >> be showed? > > > > Because the watchdog feature was enabled at compile-time and you > > presumably want it to w

Processed: tagging 594561

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 594561 + pending Bug #594561 [linux-2.6] firmware-ralink: fails to detect APs at frequency 2.472GHz Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here

Processed: tagging 608698

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 608698 + moreinfo Bug #608698 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-rc7-686: suspend/hibernate fails with "pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x57 returns -5" Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#599368: Bug#608138: initramfs-tools: NMI error on boot only in recovery mode

2011-01-02 Thread Cesare Leonardi
On 01/02/2011 10:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Then add +1 to what Michael Biebl already asked: why that message should be showed? Because the watchdog feature was enabled at compile-time and you presumably want it to work. If you add 'nowatchdog' to the kernel parameters then the kernel will no

Bug#608698: linux-image-2.6.37-rc7-686: suspend/hibernate fails with "pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x57 returns -5"

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 00:15 +0100, Willi Mann wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 > Severity: normal > > > After a few hibernate cycles, I can no longer suspend/hibernate my thinkpad > T500. It fails with mentioned error - see the attached logs. > > Additionally,

Processed: unarchiving 599368

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 599368 Bug #599368 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu0: ffa1 Unarchived Bug 599368 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 599368: http://bugs

Bug#608138: [PATCH] watchdog: Improve failure message and documentation

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...' currently prints the error value as a pointer, rather than extracting the error code with PTR_ERR(). Fix that. Add a note about the 'nowatchdog' kernel parameter to associate it with this message. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ---

Bug#608138: initramfs-tools: NMI error on boot only in recovery mode

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 21:34 +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote: > On 12/27/2010 09:36 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote: > > Grub command lines are identical except that "lapic hpet=force" in > > normal boot is substituted by "single" in recovery mode. > > I've found that if i remove "lapic" from the command li

Processed: tagging 608278

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 608278 + moreinfo Bug #608278 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Random general protection faults at boot Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608278: http://bugs.debia

Bug#608278: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Random general protection faults at boot

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 10:08 +0100, Andrea Spadaccini wrote: > Hi, > > >> Justification: breaks the whole system > > > > This does *not* break the whole system - the package works for other > > people and even you are able to reboot into another kernel version. > > Sorry, I misinterpreted the opti

Processed: tagging 607495

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 607495 + unreproducible Bug #607495 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: kernel freeze Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#597658: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64: Missing aesni-intel module in kernel

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:41 +0100, cfchris6 wrote: > What has to be done until the proposed solution to blacklist the module could > be implemented? > > I do think that it is not very nice to have a big part of those with a newer > amd64 box unable to use this functionality. > > If I get it corre

Bug#597658: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64: Missing aesni-intel module in kernel

2011-01-02 Thread cfchris6
What has to be done until the proposed solution to blacklist the module could be implemented? I do think that it is not very nice to have a big part of those with a newer amd64 box unable to use this functionality. If I get it correctly, the main reason for the decision to disable that module is

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-02 Thread Ian Campbell
Hi Stephan, Thanks for the report. On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 22:14 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-29 > Severity: important > > The bug reported in #596802 seems to have reappeared in kernel 2.6.32-29. Did -28 work OK? Otherwise what was the last known good

Bug#608698: linux-image-2.6.37-rc7-686: suspend/hibernate fails with "pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x57 returns -5"

2011-01-02 Thread Willi Mann
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal After a few hibernate cycles, I can no longer suspend/hibernate my thinkpad T500. It fails with mentioned error - see the attached logs. Additionally, my external cherry USB keyboard (plugged in the Docking Station) fail

Processed: Re: Bug#608538: btrfs root installation results in initramfs busybox prompt

2011-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 608538 btrfs-tools Bug #608538 [initramfs-tools] btrfs root installation results in initramfs busybox prompt Bug #602254 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: [lib]crc32c* modules handling Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'b

Bug#608538: btrfs root installation results in initramfs busybox prompt

2011-01-02 Thread Otavio Salvador
reassign 608538 btrfs-tools retitle 608538 Didn't include required module in initramfs thanks On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 09:06, Aron Xu wrote: > No, nothing. But I truly only get an initramfs prompt. It looks to be a btrfs-tools hook issue. Reassigning it. -- Otavio Salvador                     

Bug#608684: linux-2.6: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation

2011-01-02 Thread Slavko
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Version: 2.6.32-29 sk.po attached regards Slavko -- Slavko http://slavino.sk # Slovak translations for linux-2.6 package # Slovenské preklady pre balík linux-2.6. # Copyright (C) 2011 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distribu

Bug#608250: To Ben Hutchings

2011-01-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 14:51 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 15:13 +0100, Timothée GROS wrote: > > Even in dom0 ? > > Yes - dom0 has access to most physical devices but *not* physical CPUs. > > > How could i control my CPU speed then ? > > That would have to be done in the X

Bug#598504: linux-kbuild: And now that we have linux-kbuild 2.6.36 kernel has moved to 2.6.37-rc

2011-01-02 Thread Michal Suchanek
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.36 Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal File: linux-kbuild linux-kbuild version still lags behind kernel version. Any progress on docs saying how to update it? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (910, 't

Bug#584784: [34-longterm 156/260] MIPS: Set io_map_base for several PCI bridges lacking it

2011-01-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
From: Ben Hutchings commit 8faf2e6c201d95b780cd3b4674b7a55ede6dcbbb upstream. Several MIPS platforms don't set pci_controller::io_map_base for their PCI bridges. This results in a panic in pci_iomap(). (The panic is conditional on CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS, but that is now enabled for all PCI MIPS sy