Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:12:45, the files will be deleted. I

Processed: tagging 608138

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 608138 + pending Bug #608138 [linux-2.6] Annoying warning "NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu0" Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #608138 to the sa

Processed: tagging 596390

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 596390 + pending Bug #596390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #596390 to the same tags previous

Processed: tagging 608185

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 608185 + pending Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #608185 to the same

Processed: tagging 607863

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 607863 + pending Bug #607863 [linux-base] linux-base postinst fails to update UUIDs in /boot/boot/grub Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #607863 to the same tag

Bug#604442: Claim 800,000.00 GBP in the Gnld 2011 Promo Send.

Name: Address: Occupation:

Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

After forcefully rebooting I have removed VMware from running at boot and will test again. I wanted to make sure nothing was left loaded after just removing the modules. I'm quite experienced in Windows, but don't know the in's and out's of Linux to the extent that I do of Windows. -Origina

Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

I have not experienced a single bit of trouble until upgrading to this kernel. I will try writing a large file to other file systems as well, but I do know that I can write smaller, 1-300mb, files to other file systems without an issue. Yes I'm using aacraid. I'm using an Adaptec 2820 card with 4

Processed: tagging 596390

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 596390 + pending Bug #596390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Plea

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

Ben Hutchings writes: > DKMS does build real Debian packages. And that means that OOT module > sources do not need to be packaged differently depending on where the > modules will be built. Oh, huh, I hadn't noticed that. Thanks for the pointer! I'll have to play with that; I'd only previousl

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:55 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes: > > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> With hundreds of servers, we'd rather not install compilers and DKMS on > >> every one of them, and with lots of machines, the loss of > >> reproducibil

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

Ben Hutchings writes: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> With hundreds of servers, we'd rather not install compilers and DKMS on >> every one of them, and with lots of machines, the loss of >> reproducibility from separately compiling the modules on every system >> is an

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes: > > > Do pay attention. We were discussing the implications of changing our > > current practice of trying to avoid ABI bumps during freeze and stable > > updates. We would then probably change the uname release (the

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

Ben Hutchings writes: > Do pay attention. We were discussing the implications of changing our > current practice of trying to avoid ABI bumps during freeze and stable > updates. We would then probably change the uname release (the ABI > identifier) in each version of the package. This is certa

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:08:32PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > > So the problem was already present in -23 and it just seems to have the > > same symptoms like #596802. > > OK, thanks for testing that. > > I wonder if you could pla

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

On Tue, 04 Jan 2011, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > Julien: Are you currently shipping a kernel in production which > > would be affected by this change if we don't change the ABI > > number? Or does this only affect cases where you are testing > > squeeze? Could it be > > I have

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > > worked around by using DKMS or similar with prebuilt binaries and > > requiring exact kernel version dependencies? > > DKMS is useless if the ABI number doesn't change, in its current > form. If DKMS w

Processed: Re: Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package linux-2.6 Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6' Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6' > retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at > fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156 Bug #6088

Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

package linux-2.6 retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156 thanks [resending via smtp.academica.fi since smtp.netsonic.fi does not seem to be delivering my emails any time soon...] Gregg writes: > [1393760.788377] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): e

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > So the problem was already present in -23 and it just seems to have the > same symptoms like #596802. OK, thanks for testing that. I wonder if you could play with ethtool to enable/disable various features on the physical NIC. In pa

Bug#606964: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Xen fails to boot dom0 kernel on system with, lots of RAM

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:46 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > Iann > > >> Now I think of it can you also collect a similar log with the dom0_mem > >> workaround in place, for comparisons sake. > > >Are you able to rebuild the kernel with > >CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128? If so then a log of that boo

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

Hello, Am 04.01.2011 18:33, schrieb Ian Campbell: > I don't suppose you feel inclined to bisect between -23 and -28 to find > the first broken version, do you? (http://snapshot.debian.org/ is your > friend here) I've checked... -23: oops -24: oops -25: oops -26: oops -27: oops -28: oops -29: oop

Bug#606964: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Xen fails to boot dom0 kernel on system with, lots of RAM

Iann Now I think of it can you also collect a similar log with the dom0_mem workaround in place, for comparisons sake. Are you able to rebuild the kernel with CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128? If so then a log of that boot for comparison would be very interesting. If you don't know how le

Bug#608865: initramfs-tools: postinst fails if /tmp is mounted noexec

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:30:27AM +0100, Martin Gerdes wrote: > > > Installing initramfs-tools version 0.98.7 on squeeze (=debian testing) I get > the following error messages: > > /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296: > /tmp/mkinitramfs_6qmV4K/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide: Permission denied > /usr

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:54 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I've tried with 2.6.32-28 but problem persists. So we have a problem > with symptoms similar to #596802. I'll attach the oops details. Thanks. I don't suppose you feel inclined to bisect between -23 and -28 to find the f

Bug#599161: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Clock moved forward 50 minutes, caused Xen HVM domU restart

In addition, I received the below from "James Song" but when I queried what it changed he did not respond, so I haven't tried it.. "added timer_mode =2 and tsc_mode = 1 and viridian=1 into your configure file." On Tue, Jan

Bug#599161: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Clock moved forward 50 minutes, caused Xen HVM domU restart

Hi, No, unfortunately not. I just suffered it again aswell over the Christmas break. Let me know if you find any fix. Regards, Mark On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:50:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:05:18PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > > > > As this is when the clo

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

Hi Ian, I've tried with 2.6.32-28 but problem persists. So we have a problem with symptoms similar to #596802. I'll attach the oops details. Regards, Stephan Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.100424] device vif1.0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.103545] br0: por

Bug#606964: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Xen fails to boot dom0 kernel on system with, lots of RAM

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:08 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > Now I think of it can you also collect a similar log with the dom0_mem > workaround in place, for comparisons sake. Are you able to rebuild the kernel with CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128? If so then a log of that boot for comparison would

Bug#606964: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Xen fails to boot dom0 kernel on system with, lots of RAM

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:59 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/22/2010 10:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I was wondering about clamping something in the kernel to correspond to > > CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY and avoid the issue but you say the crash > > is after "x VCPUS" and before "Scrubb

Bug#607709: XEN kernel crash (this time with a shorter trace)

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:48 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto: > > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > [...] > > I would expect some log on the hypervisor console (xm dmesg) which > > corresponds wi

Bug#607709: XEN kernel crash (this time with a shorter trace)

Hi Ian, Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: [...] > I would expect some log on the hypervisor console (xm dmesg) which > corresponds with this hypercall failure, which would be very useful to > see.. I jus

Bug#607709: XEN kernel crash (this time with a shorter trace)

Hi Ian, thanks for working on this report. Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > A new crash on that machine, after upgrading kernel, is shown here: > > > > Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.588528]

Bug#607709: XEN kernel crash (this time with a shorter trace)

On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > A new crash on that machine, after upgrading kernel, is shown here: > > Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.588528] [ cut here > ] > Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.591269] kernel BUG at > /build/buildd-

Re: Bug#607368: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

Don Armstrong wrote: Hi, > Ok. For some reason, I hadn't originally noticed that this was > concerning an OOT module which Debian itself didn't actually > distribute. [Julien: I'm correct in that, right?] But that's probably > fine. You are correct. > Julien: Are you currently shipping a kerne

Processed: reassign

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 603767 linux-2.6,xorg Bug #603767 [general] gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7 Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'linux-2.6,xorg'. > reassign 596700 linux-2.6,xorg Bug #596700 [xorg] The X server does not deallocate its vt upon shutd

Bug#605090: Updated patch

I've put updated patches on http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/kernel-grsec/patches/ (kernel is built but not uploaded to packages/ since it's quite huge, will do that at one point. Patches are attached to that mail too. The first one (add-grsecurity-featureset) is against the debian kernel s

Bug#608804: linux-image-amd64: /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 without power cable plugged in

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:30:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Please report this upstream at under > product ACPI, component Power-Battery. Let us know the bug number or > URL so we can track it. I've just tried kernel image 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 from experi

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 08:45 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Am 02.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Ian Campbell: > > > Did -28 work OK? Otherwise what was the last known good kernel? > > The -29 kernel was the one that was installed when I've setup Squeeze. > So, there was never a different kernel on t

firmware-nonfree_0.28_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb firmware-brcm8021

Bug#606289: marked as done (4.0.517 firmware crashes frequently on HP NC522SFP)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#606289: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #606289, regarding 4.0.517 firmware crashes frequently on HP NC522SFP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#598470: marked as done (bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in "firmware-bnx2")

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#598470: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #598470, regarding bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in "firmware-bnx2" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#602450: marked as done (firmware-nonfree: Please add rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin, needed by r8712u >= 2.6.37, to firmware-realtek)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#602450: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #602450, regarding firmware-nonfree: Please add rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin, needed by r8712u >= 2.6.37, to firmware-realtek to be marked as don

Bug#587960: marked as done ([Debian] Where can I find rtl81638d-2.fw firmware for Realtek 8168D NIC?)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#564628: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #564628, regarding [Debian] Where can I find rtl81638d-2.fw firmware for Realtek 8168D NIC? to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#564628: marked as done (Add Realtek RTL8168D firmware)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#564628: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #564628, regarding Add Realtek RTL8168D firmware to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#558740: marked as done (firmware-linux-nonfree: Add Atheros AR9170 one stage firmware (ar9170.fw))

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558740: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #558740, regarding firmware-linux-nonfree: Add Atheros AR9170 one stage firmware (ar9170.fw) to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#602418: Debian Squeeze Xen with Nouveau or Radeon: Test packages

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > This combination works for me: [snip] Excellent. Thanks for testing. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Hypocrisy - Compulsive Psychosis phosflink: To flick a bulb on and off when it burns out (as if, somehow, that