Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip

martin f krafft wrote: > I still have the hardware, but it's on a production machine. It is > onboard and I added a separate NIC, so it's unused, but I cannot > really run kernel-level experiments. > > However, the machine has KVM, and as soon as KVM supports PCI > passthrough, that might be usefu

Bug#619433: linux-image-2.6.38-1-686: early crash with ACPI (regression)

- "Ben Hutchings" a écrit : > Please report this upstream at , > under product 'ACPI', component 'ACPICA-Core'. Let us know the bug > URL so we can track it. > > You should link *directly* to the video, if possible, because it > took me some time to work out whe

Bug#423562: arm debian linux kernel - XFS

* Ben Hutchings [2011-03-24 05:49]: > > For the first of these, we would need confirmation from upstream that it > > is suitable for backporting. > > Please decide whether you want to do this; if not then we should disable > XFS on armel and hppa in squeeze. I'm not planning to backport them. --

Processed: Re: Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 619371 linux-2.6 Bug #619371 [base] base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625) Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'linux-2.6'. > # i'm pretty sure its not the wakeonlan package,

Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?

Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. One or two days after *.31 went 'stable' one could still acquire the old kernel from packages.

Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?

Hi Tobias, Tobias Küster wrote: > Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of > other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old > kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. You might like . :) Kin

Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?

> > Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of > > other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old > > kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. > > You might like . :) Whoops, must have missed th

Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

Holger Levsen schrieb: > reassign 619371 linux-2.6 > # i'm pretty sure its not the wakeonlan package, if so, > # apologies and please reassign > tags 619371 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Christian, > > thanks for your bug report. We need more information from you, can you please > followup to this

Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and "irq timeout" unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed

Hi, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > When I boot the HURD without passing > -no-kvm-irqchip on the command line, the system usually will > print > > hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 > hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 > hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 > hd2: unexpected_intr: status=0x58 >

Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and "irq timeout" unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed

Hello, Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:40:34 -0500, a écrit : > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > When I boot the HURD without passing > > -no-kvm-irqchip on the command line, the system usually will > > print > > > > hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 > > hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 > >

Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and "irq timeout" unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed

Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:40:34 -0500, a écrit : >> So v2.6.39 will fix this. > > Great! Thanks for the notice! Do you happen to know which version the > bug was introduced it? Yes, it bisects to v2.6.37-rc1~142^2~39 (KVM: Check for pending events before atte

Bug#619381: linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic

forwarded 619381 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802 thanks Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of Thu Mar 24 06:38:05 +0100 2011: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:35 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.38-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes

Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 619381 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802 Bug #619381 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802'

Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and "irq timeout" unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed

Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:58:47 -0500, a écrit : > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/58669/focus=67483 Cool! Thanks for having handled this. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#614515: Same crash on two different laptop systems after resume with 2.6.37 from unstable

I think this bug is fixed in 2.6.38 but I'm not sure. Have anybody tested it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b3bb2.6040...@um.es

Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

Hi, On Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, Christian Andretzky wrote: > Hmm - I'm not really sure what you want. I've installed reportbug (The > bug-report was created using reportbug ;-) but I can't find a '-N' switch. reportbug from lenny doesnt have this switch, versions from squeeze and above do :)

Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?

As a time saver for whom ever, here are the steps I did to downgrade the kernel: Edited /etc/apt/sources.list to enable a single line: deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110314T221327Z squeeze main Then called: apt-get update apt-get install "linux-image-2.6.32-5-686=2.6.32-30" Adde

Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 01:28 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > reopen 506419 > found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-10 > found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-11 > found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.27 > tags 506419 + upstream > owner 506419 ! > quit > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I'm closing this because I think a year i

Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Hi, This module provides a power off sequence for the Iris machines from Eurobraille, a french manufacturer of braille devices. The module is small and won't do anything unless it is called with its force parameter set to 1. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Processed: tagging 423562

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 423562 + pending Bug #423562 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6-ixp4xx: XFS-filesystem crashes Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:47 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, Christian Andretzky wrote: > > Hmm - I'm not really sure what you want. I've installed reportbug (The > > bug-report was created using reportbug ;-) but I can't find a '-N' switch. > > reportbug from l

Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:46 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > This module provides a power off sequence for the Iris machines from > Eurobraille, a french manufacturer of braille devices. > The module is small and won't do anything unless it is

Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module

Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): > Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these > machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? Sure ! It's attached. Thanks for your prompt response ! Sébastien. processor : 0 vendor_id : CyrixInstead cpu fami

Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:50 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: > Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): > > Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these > > machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? > > Sure ! It's attached. Thanks for your prompt response !

Processed: tagging 619493

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 619493 + pending Bug #619493 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Please include the iris module Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#619504: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Thermal trip points insanely low Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-31 Severity: important

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-31 Severity: important On boot, thermal trip points are set to the following: cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ1/trip_points critical (S5): 105 C passive: 16 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=100 devices=CPU0 CPU1 active[0]: 16 C: devices=

Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted

2011/3/14 Eddy Petrișor : > 2011/3/13 Eddy Petrișor : >> On 11.03.2011 12:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel. >>> >>> I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and >>> installed it on my laptop. I

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #618847 (http://bugs.debian.org/618847) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c

Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.37-2 Severity: normal On my DELL Latitude E6400 laptop, the Ethernet cable, though plugged in before booting, isn't always detected at boot time (at least when /etc/init.d/networking is run). More precisely, at home it is always detected, but I'm currently connected

Bug#615642: nfs-kernel-server: Looks lite this problem also exists in 2.6.32-5-kirkwood armv5tel

Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1:1.2.2-4 Severity: normal I seem to have this problem on squeeze Kirkwood arm5tel as well /Joel -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-kirkwood L

Processed (with 1 errors): problem still exist in current squeeze kernel

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 552088 ! Bug #552088 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6-686: ath5k phy1: noise floor calibration timeout Bug 552088 is not marked as done; doing nothing. > Version: 2.6.32-30 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping p

Bug#552088: bump

Guys, whats the current status on this bug? I'm having the same problem as the bug author. Using the "old" madwifi driver eliminates this problem but i want to stick to the ath5k driver. Ideas? Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: 36D1 1570 DCAD B767 EABE F60D 6

Bug#552088: bump

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:47:37PM +0100, Stefan Bauer wrote: > Guys, > > whats the current status on this bug? I'm having the same problem as > the bug author. > > Using the "old" madwifi driver eliminates this problem but i want to > stick to the ath5k driver. Ideas? Does ath5k in 2.6.38 (now

Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module

Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 15:06 +): > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:50 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: > > Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): > > > Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these > > > machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? > > > > Sure

Bug#619472: X.org with i915 produces garbage sometimes being run on Linux 2.6.38

On 24/03/2011 11:30, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: After upgrading the kernel, X.org produces garbage in random screen areas. That garbage persists in the windows in which it appears (I'm able to take a screenshot of it). I would suggest you to give a look at this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected

retitle 619520 eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection severity 619520 wishlist thanks After some tests, it appears that the 2-second delay before running ethtool was too short here. Though increasing the delay works (I now test the link each second, and it i

Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 619520 eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the > Ethernet detection Bug #619520 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected Changed Bug title to 'eth0 is not activated early enough, ca

Bug#619520: marked as done (eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:13:57 + with message-id <20110324211357.gm2...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected has caused the Debian Bug report #619520, regarding eth0 is not activated early enough, caus

Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip

Ben Hutchings wrote: > If you can't test it, what good does it to reopen the bug? It is a real bug and I have no reason to believe it was fixed. Meanwhile the submitter has said that as soon as circumstances allow, he'll test it. Is the bug doing harm by sitting open? Perhaps someone should low

Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:18:41PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > If you can't test it, what good does it to reopen the bug? > > It is a real bug and I have no reason to believe it was fixed. It *was* a real bug and you have no reason to believe it is not fixed. > Me

Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip

Ben Hutchings wrote: > It *was* a real bug and you have no reason to believe it is not fixed. Sure, it is possible that 6c2da9c or eb10a781 fixes this. But I really do suspect that it's not fixed. I'd take at least 1:1 odds. > New submitters are expected to look through existing bug reports.

Bug#607548: The screen is still black

This bug was closed (I think) because the problem was fixed according to some information that I can no longer recover. That is however not true. When starting Debian squeeze or Debian sid I still often get a black screen on my Compaq 6510b. When this happens, I type (blindly) user (root) password

Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected

reopen 619520 thanks On 2011-03-24 21:13:57 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Network drivers are not expected to start the hardware until the > network interface is brought up (by ifup). This is poorly designed. There should be a way to bring up the network interface early in the boot sequence (alte

Processed: Re: Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 619520 Bug #619520 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619520: http://bugs.debia

Processed: reassign 619520 to general

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not a kernel bug > reassign 619520 general Bug #619520 [linux-2.6] eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'general'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6

Bug#607548: The screen is still black

On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 01:10 +0100, Leif Asbrink wrote: > This bug was closed (I think) because the problem was fixed according > to some information that I can no longer recover. [...] This bug was never closed; I don't know why you think that. Can you test whether this is fixed in a more recent

Processed: closing 506419

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # sigh > close 506419 Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to martin f krafft > thanks Stopping processing her

Processed: found 607548 in 2.6.32-29

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 607548 2.6.32-29 Bug #607548 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32: Black screen when i915 is loaded on Compaq 6510b There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-29' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version f

Processed: tagging 615035

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 615035 + pending Bug #615035 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] FIEMAP wrongly reports holes for delayed-allocation extents Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #6