Hello,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:25:16AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Hi maks,
>
> as you are certainly aware, usplash is dead and has been removed from
> the archive since quite some time (squeeze does no longer contain it).
indeed I asked for its removal.
> initramfs-tools still contain
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote:
>
> So, which one is the preferred location? Will anything break if I just clear
> out the conf.d directory?
> ladmin@fury:~$ dpkg -S /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/*
> dpkg: /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy not found.
> dpkg: /
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote:
>
>
> > no, check your box with:
> > egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/
>
> Great.
>
> /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
> /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:MODULES=most
> /etc/ini
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
Severity: normal
Hi maks,
as you are certainly aware, usplash is dead and has been removed from
the archive since quite some time (squeeze does no longer contain it).
initramfs-tools still contains usplash specific code, which can be
safely dropped (and p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620896 + upstream
Bug #620896 [linux-2.6] Bug when listing files/dirs on ncpfs
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 620896 linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Bug #620896 [linux-2.6] Bug when listing files/dirs on ncpfs
Set Bug forwarded-to-address t
Another report of ncpfs regression in 2.6.38:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 19:29 -0400, Diego Rubert wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.38-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Got a bug message when listing items on ncpfs filesystem with 'ls' command.
> Makes mounted filesystem useless.
> Trace:
>
> [ 48.9
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:24:28AM -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>
> Unfortunately it was not a trivial process to install Debian
> "squeeze" onto an EC2 instance; it took a couple ugly Perl scripts,
> a patched Debian-Installer, and several manual
> post-install-but-before-reboot steps (like fixi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 620896 normal
Bug #620896 [linux-2.6] Bug when listing files/dirs on ncpfs
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
620896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:36:01 +0100
with message-id <1301960161.2935.72.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#611750: Bug#613790: 2nd update (Re: Bug#613790:
pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate)
has caused the Debian Bug report #613790,
regarding pm-
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 13:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Over at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35936 , Chris
> Wilson asked about the inclusion of commit
> 29c5a587284195278e233eec5c2234c24fb2c204 in 2.6.38-2. From looking at
> the changelogs, i don't think it was included, b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 611750
Bug#611750: Asus EeePC resume from hibernation fails
Bug#613790: pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate
Disconnected #611750 from all other report(s).
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:10 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I'm just reporting this as a build-time regression in stable as it
> caused an issue when we merged recent stable updates into the Debian
> tree. I've never personally tried to configure kdump on powerpc.
>
> fwiw, a quick test shows that k
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:33:39AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 00:10 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * dann frazier [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
> >
> > > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> > >
> > > CC arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
> > > arch/powe
> no, check your box with:
> egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/
Great.
/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:MODULES=most
/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy:MODULES=dep
So, which one is the preferred locati
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * dann frazier [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
>
> > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> >
> > CC arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c: In function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode':
> > arch/powerpc/k
On Apr 04, 2011, at 10:24, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> On Apr 02, 2011, at 22:02, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> Sorry for not following up sooner. Are you still able to reproduce
>> this failure? If I set up an identical Debian stable instance on
>> EC-2, am I likely to reproduce it myself? Do you have a pack
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-33_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-33_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:59:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#619450: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-33
has caused the Debian Bug report #619450,
regarding Oops after loading via-ircc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:59:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600957: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-33
has caused the Debian Bug report #600957,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please include vmw_pvscsi (VMware PVSCSI)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +, Arno Schuring wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> > > During installation, I configured initramfs-tools to determine the
> > > required
> > > modules automatically, which resulted in a non-booting system (notice that
> > > the sil680 module is missing):
> > [...]
> >
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-33.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-33_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-33_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-33_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.3
To address your kind response to me Miguel;
I read all the links you gave me for my 'Silicon Image 3114'
SATA/Raid controller chip. I also followed and read the sub links.
I shall certainly be on the look out for disk corruptions.
I could not see any mention of my 'NO BOOT' symptom in the links.
in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 620857 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-31
Bug #620857 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: xorg x11 server does not
display cursor
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-31.
Bug
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:10:50PM +0200, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-31
> Severity: critical
> Tags: squeeze
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
[...]
All userland software depends on the kernel, so is not unrelated.
This bug is important, though.
The bug i
Over at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35936 , Chris
Wilson asked about the inclusion of commit
29c5a587284195278e233eec5c2234c24fb2c204 in 2.6.38-2. From looking at
the changelogs, i don't think it was included, but i'd appreciate if
someone from the kernel team could provide a more
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze
Justification: breaks unrelated software
recent upgrade of linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (some two weeks ago) made X11 start
without mouse cursor visible (mouse operates correctly - when mouse moves over
active region, I can see the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620848 - squeeze
Bug #620848 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: unable to enumerate usb
device 6
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
> found 620848 2.6.32-31
Bug #620848 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: unable to enumerate usb
device 6
Ther
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-31) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Mon Mar 7 21:35:22 UTC 2011
** Command line:
root=UUID=f2f57267-0289-412c-9f9b-e8702e8b
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:42:06PM +0200, Moritz M?hlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:30:05PM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 09:29:25AM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote:
> > > I tried again with vanilla 2.6.32 (2.6.27-2.6.31 are unusable due to a
> > > kernel
> > > mem
On 04/04/2011 11:20 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:46:01AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.37-2
> [...]
>
> Please test 2.6.38-2.
i'm currently running 2.6.38-2, and i have not yet seen this particular
bug (NULL dereference in intel_t
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:46:01AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.37-2
[...]
Please test 2.6.38-2.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
-
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:51:16PM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:52:39 +0100
> Michael Dorrington wrote:
[...]
> > AFAICT, the Debian kernel complies with the DFSG (or is extremely
> > close). However, it retains drivers that require a firmware in order
> > to be functional and
On Apr 02, 2011, at 22:02, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Sorry for not following up sooner. Are you still able to reproduce
> this failure? If I set up an identical Debian stable instance on
> EC-2, am I likely to reproduce it myself? Do you have a package list
> or EC2 base image I can use as a starting po
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 620374 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35936
Bug #620374 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: booting 2.6.38-2-686 fails
during gdm login with: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
elapsed... GPU hung
Set
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-2
Severity: normal
Here's a backtrace of a NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.37-2-686 on a
machine with an intel chipset. This machine (an Asus EeePC 900) has
no physical TV connector. The machine is regularly suspended to RAM,
and gets different external VGA mon
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:52:39 +0100
Michael Dorrington wrote:
>
> Karl Goetz wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:42:41 -0300
> > "Emiliano M. Rudenick" wrote:
> >
> >>> We don't have a free kernel in the archive yet, but you could
> >>> easily install linux-libre of your own accord.
> >>> thanks,
Hi Ben,
> > During installation, I configured initramfs-tools to determine the required
> > modules automatically, which resulted in a non-booting system (notice that
> > the sil680 module is missing):
> [...]
>
> The initramfs-tools 'MODULES=dep' mode is primarily meant for small
> systems with
FYI, bug still happens with the latest 2.6.38.-2 kernel, so it definitely
doesn't seem kernel related:
[ 150.720026] [ cut here ]
[ 150.720040] WARNING: at
/tmp/buildd/linux-aptosid-2.6-2.6.38/debian/build/source_amd64_none/net/sched/sch_generic.c:256
dev_watchdog+0x25
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
> b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/04/2011 12:58:24 PM:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I expect that at some point we'll want to update the driver to add new
> > hardware support, and then we'll pick this up along the way. Until
> > then, how
b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/04/2011 12:58:24 PM:
Hi,
> I expect that at some point we'll want to update the driver to add new
> hardware support, and then we'll pick this up along the way. Until
> then, however, I'm not going to apply it.
I don't understand your decision; upgrading the who
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.98.8
> Severity: normal
>
> (resending manually because exim hadn't been configured yet)
>
> This is a new Wheezy install on an old server machine. The machine has four
> PATA disks, tied to two
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
Severity: normal
(resending manually because exim hadn't been configured yet)
This is a new Wheezy install on an old server machine. The machine has four
PATA disks, tied to two controllers. The four disks are combined into a SW-raid
volume using mdadm:
l
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:45:40AM +0200, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
> b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/03/2011 06:06:24 AM:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> > > This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or
> the
> > > management card eventually.
> >
> > How does the host lose connecti
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:12 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:42:57 +0200,
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
...
> > Anything happening here with respect to this
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:42:57 +0200,
Svante Signell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > > Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > Code: f4 01 00 00 ef 31 f6 48 89 df e8 15 dd ff ff 85 c0
> > > > 0f 88 2b 03 00 0
During the weekend I've created a machine for testing which acts as nis server
(and client of course) and I could see the same problem (without nfs, autofs
and others). So I assume, that the nis package is responsible for this problem.
The nis package is (output from dpkg -l nis):
ii nis 3.17-3
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Code: f4 01 00 00 ef 31 f6 48 89 df e8 15 dd ff ff 85 c0
> > > 0f 88 2b 03 00 00 48 89 ef e8 ee 11 b9 e0 8b 7b 40 e8 9f 25 a7 e0 48 8b
> > > 43 38 <66
Hi Moritz,
We changed the machine to Proxmox a month ago, which is Debian-based but
sports a "custom" updated kernel.
Our original installation had three similar lockups with lennys kernel
but we haven't experiencied such problems with proxmox kernels, so I
think the problem has been fixed in Kvm
b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/03/2011 06:06:24 AM:
Hi Ben,
> > This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or
the
> > management card eventually.
>
> How does the host lose connectivity?
>
> I'm somewhat wary of cherry-picking such a patch without a very good
> reason.
49 matches
Mail list logo
