Le Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:34:15 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov a écrit :
> >Please report whether this bug is fixed in Debian kernel version
> > 2.6.32-31 (as included in Debian 6.0.1).
>
> I'm using Samsung N150, problem still exists: sometimes system wake up
> correctly, sometimes with instant reboot af
Hi Martin,
Martin Teufel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:46:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Thanks for letting us know. Could you try the patch from
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7
>>
>> and boot with the drm.edid_strict=0 option?
>
> I applied this patc
Hi,
I applied this patch to the source tree of linux 2.6.38 with debian
patches (package linux-source-2.6.38 of wheezy), compiled the kernel
with the same config as of debians linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64 (wheezy)
and set 'drm_kms_helper.poll=0', but it had absolutely no affect. Same
messages every
Hi,
2011/5/2 Ben Hutchings :
> This was due to a binutils bug (#623964) which is supposed to be fixed
> in binutils 2.21.51.20110421-1. Please ensure that the buildds are
> upgraded and then tell wanna-build to retry.
Thanks, it has been given back.
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .
On 02/05/11 18:38, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 11:11:25 +0200, David Brown wrote:
This is not directly related to your issues here, but it is possible to
make a 1-disk raid1 set so that you are not normally degraded. When you
want to do the backup, you can grow the raid1 s
linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 failed to build on alain:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6&arch=armel&ver=2.6.38-4&stamp=1303644881
This was due to a binutils bug (#623964) which is supposed to be fixed
in binutils 2.21.51.20110421-1. Please ensure that the buildds are
upgrade
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 16:50 +0200, Sebastian Hofmann wrote:
> Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-31
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Hi,
>
> I have 64 bit xen kernel from squeeze installed on a dual xeon
> maschine. Usually everything r
On Monday 02 May 2011 12:25:07 Alex Deucher wrote:
[snip]
> Can you bisect?
I really don't know :-) Haven't done it before. On the other hand, I will
surely not have time to do it until next sunday (if I have time next sunday).
Sucks, yeah :-/
> I suspect the culprit is one of the patches th
On Mon, 02 May 2011 11:11:25 +0200, David Brown wrote:
> This is not directly related to your issues here, but it is possible to
> make a 1-disk raid1 set so that you are not normally degraded. When you
> want to do the backup, you can grow the raid1 set with the usb disk,
> want for the resyn
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:07:41AM -0400, Stirling Westrup wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:01 AM, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:00:46AM -0400, Stirling Westrup wrote:
> >>
> >> BOOTDIR is a variable used in update-initramfs and controls where the
> >> script expects to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 625224 + pending
Bug #625224 [initramfs-tools] xhci-hcd has the wrong module name
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
625224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 625224 important
Bug #625224 [initramfs-tools] xhci-hcd has the wrong module name
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
625224: http://bugs.debian.org/
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
In /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions, xhci-hcd is spelled
simply xhci. It was renamed to xhci-hcd in 2.6.34-rc2.
Please update this script.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
2011/5/2 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> On Lun 02 May 2011 11:23:48 Alex Deucher escribió:
> [snip]
>> You might try the patch here:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7
>>
>> If you are using a DVI or HDMI port, some TV's don't properly update
>> their checksums for di
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
I have 64 bit xen kernel from squeeze installed on a dual xeon maschine.
Usually everything runs fine until it comes to heavy load on a domU with high
I/O and memory con
On Lun 02 May 2011 11:23:48 Alex Deucher escribió:
[snip]
> You might try the patch here:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7
>
> If you are using a DVI or HDMI port, some TV's don't properly update
> their checksums for different ports if they have minor edid changes
> for th
I have just tested this again with experimental kernel 2.6.39-rc4-486 (Debian
2.6.39~rc4-1~experimental.1). The problem is still occuring with that kernel
build:
# hciconfig -a
hci0: Type: BR/EDR Bus: USB
BD Address: 00:1F:81:00:01:1C ACL MTU: 1021:4 SCO MTU: 180:1
DOWN
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: important
Since upgrading to xserver-xorg 1.7.4, I have been unable to control the
backlight of my Samsung Q45 laptop.
I originally filed this against xorg-server as #569596, but was told it
is a kernel bug.
/sys/class/backlight is empty.
This bug
2011/5/1 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> On Dom 01 May 2011 18:09:27 Thibaut Girka escribió:
> [snip]
>> I'm not talking about ignoring broken EDIDs, but about actually fixing
>> them[1].
>
> This is clearly not my problem. I have two monitors, both the same brand and
> model. One is connec
On 02/05/2011 14:17, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> For info, sometimes ago, I also add a problem with spurious
>> "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."
>> Sorry, I do not remember from which exact kernel version it was. The
>> problems occurs for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 624443 linux-2.6
Bug #624443 [udev] udev: Device files for usb satnav (Windows CE 5.0 fat
filesystem) no longer created: perhaps kernel/module bug.
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versi
reassign 624443 linux-2.6
thanks
On Apr 28, ael wrote:
> Apr 28 13:54:11 precise kernel: [ 91.941826] scsi scan: INQUIRY result too
> short (5), using 36
>
> ---
>
> Given the INQUIRY result too short above, this may not ha
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:01 AM, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:00:46AM -0400, Stirling Westrup wrote:
>>
>> BOOTDIR is a variable used in update-initramfs and controls where the
>> script expects to find initrd.img files. By default it is set to
>> '/boot' but can be overrid
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:00:46AM -0400, Stirling Westrup wrote:
>
> BOOTDIR is a variable used in update-initramfs and controls where the
> script expects to find initrd.img files. By default it is set to
> '/boot' but can be overridden with a setting in update-initramfs.conf
> or by passing the
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> For info, sometimes ago, I also add a problem with spurious
> "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."
> Sorry, I do not remember from which exact kernel version it was. The
> problems occurs for a second screen on DVI output of a laptop. It was
>
On 01/05/2011 21:51, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Dom 01 May 2011 16:40:39 Thibaut Girka escribió:
>> [Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel]
>>
>> This whole bug really looks like #615598.
>> This might be a bug in nouveau or in the kernel.
[..]
> Considerin
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:38 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 624702 moreinfo
> stop
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:41:14PM -0400, Stirling Westrup wrote:
>> Package: initramfs-tools
>> Version: 0.98.8
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>
> care to post your usage of BOOTDIR?
> not sure it this variable
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Ian, should we apply the backport from
> > > 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et
> >
Is possible, but this problem not appears on a i386 system with debian.
Gameservers running using 32-bit library (ia32-libs), they can not run is
64-bit mode.My question is if is recommended to install i386 on system and
after that install the bigmem kernel to see all my 16 gb of ram because i wa
On 02/05/2011 00:06, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I run what I imagine is a fairly unusual disk setup on my laptop,
consisting of:
ssd -> raid1 -> dm-crypt -> lvm ->
On 05/01/11 19:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> That's not the whole of the message, is it?
>
Yes, it is. Of course I googled for messages like this,
but there wasn't much to find.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
31 matches
Mail list logo
