rleigh's patch resolves a systemd boot problem for me, so if this could
be uploaded soon, that'd be great.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 04:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>Indeed. That statement is dated 2009 and the driver has moved on.
I apologize; I assumed the documentation to be current and accurate.
> No. You only have the evidence of your own model.
> Ben.
You're correct. If the acer_wmi module isn
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 11:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Ian, should we apply the backport from
> > > > 64141da587
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 613634 + pending
Bug #613634 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Using pvcreate on a
multipathed iscsi device produces a kernel bug
Bug #610812 [linux-2.6]
Did the driver work on this hardware in earlier kernel versions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504131549.gb1...@gpm.stappers.nl
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: normal
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script /usr/share/bug/nfs-common/script exited with an error
status (return code = 256). Do you still want to file a rep
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: important
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script /usr/share/bug/nfs-common/script exited with an error
status (return code = 256). Do you still want to file a
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.3-2
Severity: normal
Please select tags: (one at a time) [none]
Gathering additional data, this may take a while...
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
The package bug script /usr/share/bug/nfs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 621027 625600
Bug#621027: Invalid shell option in start-statd
Bug#625600: bashism in /usr/sbin/start-statd
Forcibly Merged 621027 625600.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621027: http://
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please consider enabling CONFIG_RTL8192CU ("Realtek RTL8192CU/RTL8188CU
USB Wireless Network Adapter") as a module, for support of Realtek
RTL8188CE-VAU, RTL8188CUS and RTL8192CU USB 802.11n wireless LAN
chipsets.
Thi
Package: firmware-realtek
Version: 0.29
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Please consider including firmware used by the rtl8192cu driver (added
at Linux 2.6.39-rc1) for support of USB wireless LAN devices containing
RTL8188CE-VAU, RTL8188CUS or RTL8192CU chipsets.
The firmware file (rtlwifi/rt
On 05/04/2011 03:44 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Please select tags: (one at a time) [none]
> Gathering additional data, this may take a while...
> rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: rpcinfo: RPC: Authentication error; why =
> Client credential too weak
> The package bug script /usr/share/bug
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 21:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Are there any other outstanding fixes or other blockers for a 2.6.32-34
> > upload? The approximate two-monthly schedule for stable point releases
> > means that we should be aim
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #613634,
regarding base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at
/build/.../source_amd64_xen/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1649!
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #613634,
regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel
BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!
to be marked as do
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#614400: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #614400,
regarding base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at
/build/.../source_amd64_xen/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1649!
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617508: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #617508,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: File permissions wrong on NFS4 mounts,
but OK after explicit stat
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621072: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #621072,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32-33 failes to boot as PV domU on Xen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#614400: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #614400,
regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel
BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!
to be marked as do
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621072: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #621072,
regarding 2.6.32-33 Xen amd64 kernel fails to boot as Xen guest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#622779: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #622779,
regarding sparc config missing SERIAL_8250{,_PCI}
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2011 20:07:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#624268: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #624268,
regarding [squeeze] include important changes from 2.6.32.39
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Rik Theys wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update.
> >
> >I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update.
> >For stable, yes, we'll consider it once it's accepted upstream. Please
> >let us k
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-34_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-34_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-34.
Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels:
#604013 base: "ls -al" on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes with
-1 ENOMEM
Nobody has been able to reproduce and the submitter doesn't respond.
Maybe ping the submitter again, close if no reply.
#622325 linux-image-2.6.
* Antonios Galanopoulos [2011-04-27 11:50]:
> I am not sure what the differences are. I have successfully booted it
> with foonas (http://foonas.org) via tftp and there it appears as a
> linkstation Pro in the dmesg logs. Same with debian but the Sata
> drives are not recognised.
And SATA works w
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 01:52 +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Yes, I saw that when I checked your svn repos. You forgot (or
intentionally omitted, but if so, said nothing) to add the bit about the
linux-headers-common to 4.2. See the relevant portion of my
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:15 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Did the driver work on this hardware in earlier kernel versions?
Yes, it worked in 2.6.32.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Rik Theys wrote:
>
> > On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >>Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update.
> > >
> > >I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update.
> > >F
2011/5/3 Frédéric Boiteux :
> time nice env DEBFULLNAME="Your Name" DEBEMAIL="Your e-mail address" \
> KBUILD_PKG_ROOTCMD="fakeroot -u" fakeroot make -j 2
> KDEB_PKGVERSION=$kvers-$krel KERNELRELEASE=$kvers$ksuff deb-pkg
>
>
> wait... quite a long time, install the generated .deb , boot it
> and
Le Thu, 5 May 2011 10:02:17 +0700,
Sergei Stolyarov a écrit :
> Thank you for detailed description, have created kernel package,
> installed, still not working: reboot instead of resume. The only
> working kernel package version is 2.6.32-29. So looks like reverting
> x86-hotplug-use-mwait-to-off
Ben
Max
Julien
Kibi
Sven
I''m getting a segfault with Bug listed in dmesg, but different after
today's upgrade than it was yesterday.
I'm very happy to wait till tomorrow for a possible fix to be uploaded.
I'm also very happy to file a bug if anyone wants to look at my old intel i865
chipse
Hi, I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to ask.
I have a weird problem with a Debian testing (Wheezy) install,
gnome-settings-daemon keeps crashing whenever I boot with kernel 2.6.38.
With other kernel releases (2.6.32 and 2.6.39) I have no problem at all,
I initially filed a bug re
33 matches
Mail list logo
