Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-1
Severity: important
Since upgrading from 2.6.38-2 (Debian 2.6.38-5), I've found that, at
least on systems with integrated Intel graphics, loading the eeprom
module hangs indefinitely after reporting messages of the form
[drm] GMBUS timed out, falling back to b
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-1
Severity: wishlist
Aufs was included in linux-image-2.6.38, could you please include it in
linux-image-2.6.39, too? It's required for Debian live.
Thanks.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.39-1-686-pae (Debian 2.6.39-1) (m...@debian.org)
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
BH> I wonder why you had both linux-image-686 and linux-image-2.6-686
BH> installed. They are redundant with each other.
Well, can you please mention that in
aptitude show linux-image-2.6-486 linux-image-486
else sooner or later over the years one will end up w
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 07:51 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-686
>
> If we are going to end up with -486, things could be smoother.
>
> First it would be great if we didn't need to download the big .deb only
> to find out we can't use it... OK, never mind that.
There is n
Package: linux-image-686
If we are going to end up with -486, things could be smoother.
First it would be great if we didn't need to download the big .deb only
to find out we can't use it... OK, never mind that.
Upon aptitude upgrade
We see this six (6) times
│ This system requires a different
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I understand that the plan is to release the next stable update in 'late
> May', i.e. the next 10 days.
That's what _should_ happen according to the rough schedule, yes. Sadly
(or not so, depending on how you look at it), I haven't found t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 627492 important
Bug #627492 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-amd64: please enable
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_APPLE
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
627492
The Debian kernel team regularly backports driver updates to the Linux
kernel in stable releases to add support for new hardware. In the
current stable release, the Linux kernel is based on longterm series
2.6.32.y.
We generally prefer to cherry-pick bug fixes and new hardware support,
but there
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
Severity: minor
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
> root@yun:/boot# update-initramfs -k 2.6.38-2p -c /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-2p
> Invalid argument for option -k.
> [...]
The error message "Invalid argument for option -k." is
misleading. Instead, it should
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:35 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Ben Hutchings :
> [...]
> > We would appreciate any help you can provide in testing this, and any
> > advice on changes that should be added or reverted.
>
> Sure. What is the deadline ?
>
> I can not fetch from the aforementionned URI
Ben Hutchings :
[...]
> We would appreciate any help you can provide in testing this, and any
> advice on changes that should be added or reverted.
Sure. What is the deadline ?
I can not fetch from the aforementionned URI yet.
$ cat .git/config
...
[remote "debian"]
url = git://git.debi
I understand that the plan is to release the next stable update in 'late
May', i.e. the next 10 days.
I'm working on network driver updates to support new hardware, and I
think that a reasonable amount of regression testing will require at
least a week from now. Please consider delaying the stabl
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2011 14:59:45 +0200
with message-id <4dd7b741.1060...@debian.org>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #611574,
regarding linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-amd64: 2.6.37 is quite slow at copying data
(Desktop)
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Accepted:
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.39+35_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_2.6.39+35_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.39+35_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.39+35_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-pae_2.6.39+35_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-he
> "JN" == Jonathan Nieder writes:
JN> To be clear, does that mean you had been running 2.6.38-5 before the
JN> upgrade, too?
Yes. But I was forced to reboot with my backup,
$ apt-show-versions|grep linux-image
linux-image-2.6-686/unstable uptodate 2.6.38+34
linux-image-2.6.37-2-686 2.6.37-2 in
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Sorry. All I know is I did this upgrade,
[... packages that are not linux-image-foo ...]
> then rebooted and got those messages. The workaround was to reboot a
> second time with 2.6.37-2-686 instead of 2.6.38-2-686, which made none
> of those messages.
To be clear,
> "BB" == Bastian Blank writes:
BB> Please specify your problem clearly.
Sorry. All I know is I did this upgrade,
[UPGRADE] acpid 1:2.0.9-1 -> 1:2.0.10-1
[UPGRADE] binutils 2.21.51.20110421-5 -> 2.21.51.20110421-6
[UPGRADE] grub-common 1.99-3 -> 1.99-4
[UPGRADE] grub-pc 1.99-3 -> 1.99-4
[UPGR
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 06:40:38PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
[nothing]
Please specify your problem clearly.
Bastian
--
No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned.
-- Kirk, "Spock's Brain", stardate 5431.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ke
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5
Setting the system clock.
Cannot access the Hardware Clock via any known method.
Use the --debug option to see the details of our search for an access method.
Unable to set System Clock to: Sat May 21 10:29:45 UTC 2011 ...
^[[33m(warning).^[[39;49m
^[%@findfs:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 627497 linux-2.6 2.6.38-3~bpo60+1
Bug #627497 [linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64]
linux-headers-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64: "Unable to handle kernel paging request" with
radeon KMS without non-free firmware
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-header
Package: linux-tools-2.6.39
Version: 2.6.39-1
I can not install linux-tools-2.6.39 because unstable ships libperl5.12
but linux-tools-2.6.39 depend on libperl5.10 .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-1
Severity: normal
The old backlight driver for backlight on MacBooks has been reworked and
renamed.
mbp_nvidia_bl is now apple_bl. It would be useful to have this module built, so
apple users can have working backlight control.
Thanks,
-- Mourad DC
-- Packag
22 matches
Mail list logo
