Unable to halt machine due to invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP running 2.6_2.6.32-35-amd64

2011-06-27 Thread Volodymyr Shcherbyna
Dear Debian Team, This is my first message in this group, and beforehand I would like to thank you all for making Debian so great Operating System. Good job! Recently I have upgraded my Debian amd64 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 and I have noticed a glitch when shutting down machine remotely. When I am doing

Bug#631799: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel logs name_count maxed, losing inode data messages

2011-06-27 Thread Rik Theys
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-35 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, On some of our servers, we periodically see name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in the kernel log. From what I can tell from Google, they are probably harmless and caused by the auditing subsystem. The following

Processed: tagging 607888

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 607888 + pending Bug #607888 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Generated initrds missing critical modules Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607888:

Bug#631802: linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops while running 'aptitude install' on a package

2011-06-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc3-1~experimental.1 Severity: important Hi, today, while running 'aptitude install' on a package, the machine crashed hard, requiring me to press the reset button: Jun 27 10:32:12 spruce kernel: [ 6982.765536] [ cut here ] Jun 27

Processed: tagging 627547

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 627547 + pending Bug #627547 [initramfs-tools] /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: wrong arguments give misleading error message Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627547:

Bug#631802: marked as done (linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops while running 'aptitude install' on a package)

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:40:28 + with message-id 20110627104028.ge23...@vostochny.stro.at and subject line Re: Bug#631802: linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops while running 'aptitude install' on a package has caused the Debian Bug report #631802, regarding

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Lukas Czerner
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote: On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this one:

Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

2011-06-27 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader understands, most common use is to generate uImage and uInitrd for U-Boot booloader.

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Amir Goldstein
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Lukas Czerner lczer...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote: On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: Besides which, line 534 in the

Bug#631567: [linux-source-2.6.39] Recompiled kernel crash on kms with radeon HD6670

2011-06-27 Thread Francesco Muzio
I solved the problem, see details here https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38675 I'm sorry for having wasted your time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Unable to halt machine due to invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP running 2.6_2.6.32-35-amd64

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote: Dear Debian Team, This is my first message in this group, and beforehand I would like to thank you all for making Debian so great Operating System. Good job! Recently I have upgraded my Debian amd64 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 and I

Re: Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:28:34AM +, Hector Oron wrote: Hello, flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader understands, most

Bug#631289: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#631289: iwlagn: Kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 in Debian Testing causes Lenovo X201 and T500 wifi to crash Netgear DGN3500 ADSL router/Wifi a

2011-06-27 Thread Russel Winder
Ben, A friend has suggested the problem lies in allowing 802.11n and that I should retry using only 802.11g which I shall do to gain more data and report back so that there is a record in case someone actually is interested in fixing this new feature (as apparently it is not a bug :-) in

Re: Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

2011-06-27 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:   While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:   * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz post package installation.   * and other hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uInitrd

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 27-06-11 13:16:50, Lukas Czerner wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote: On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am

Re: Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:53:58PM +, Hector Oron wrote: Hello, 2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:   While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:   * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz post package installation.

Bug#631289: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#631289: iwlagn: Kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 in Debian Testing causes Lenovo X201 and T500 wifi to crash Netgear DGN3500 ADSL router/Wifi a

2011-06-27 Thread Russel Winder
Ben, As well as my report at http://forum1.netgear.com/showthread.php?t=67333 there is the report at http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=617841sid=60cca64962f1b26b474f3a89c2963ab6 The commonality is the 2.6.39 kernel, iwlagn, and Netgear so not necessarily an indicator. The difference

Fwd: e4rat broken; ext4_fiemap to be fixed any time soon?

2011-06-27 Thread John Lindgren
Hi, I asked this question on debian-user, and one person suggested that I ask here instead. Please include my email address in any replies, since I am not a subscriber to the list. -- John Original Message Subject:e4rat broken; ext4_fiemap to be fixed any time soon?

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Lukas Czerner
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote: On Mon 27-06-11 13:16:50, Lukas Czerner wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote: On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: Besides

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Ted Ts'o
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it - either state that we want to fully support data=journal - and then we should

Processed: reopening 631255

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # was only merged after rc4 reopen 631255 Bug #631255 {Done: maximilian attems m...@stro.at} [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-amd64: aptitude install triggers kerneloops 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;

Processed: reopening 631802

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # was only merged after rc4 reopen 631802 Bug #631802 {Done: maximilian attems m...@stro.at} [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops while running 'aptitude install' on a package 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been

Re: Fwd: e4rat broken; ext4_fiemap to be fixed any time soon?

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:14:30AM -0400, John Lindgren wrote: Hi, I asked this question on debian-user, and one person suggested that I ask here instead. Please include my email address in any replies, since I am not a subscriber to the list. [...] I think the answer is 'not until you

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2011-06-27 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #515201 (http://bugs.debian.org/515201) # *

Bug#631843: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: General protection fault

2011-06-27 Thread Thomas Nilsson
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-35 Severity: critical Tags: upstream Justification: breaks the whole system This problem came after updating the kernel to the latest Debian release which was released this weekend. There were to general protection faults before the system become inaccesible.

Processed: severity of 631843 is important

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 631843 important Bug #631843 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: General protection fault Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631843:

Processed: severity of 631843 is important

2011-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 631843 important Bug #631843 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: General protection fault Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 631843 to the same value. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#626189: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686: kernel BUG (invalid opcode) on reboot -f

2011-06-27 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk writes: On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:55 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: As a STONITH measure, I issued reboot -f on a Xen dom0 while several domUs were running. This didn't kill the machine but resulted in the BUGs below, and made further interaction impossible,

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 27-06-11 12:01:40, Ted Tso wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it - either state that we want to fully

Bug#631866: linux-source-2.6.39: no APM support even when compiled in AND booted with apm=on

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:28:34PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote: Package: linux-source-2.6.39 Version: 2.6.39-2 Severity: normal Summary: I recompiled with make menuconfig, loaded the default config for linux-image-2.6.39-486-2 into menuconfig, disabled ACPI, enabled APM (but not the

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534 from Postfix on ext4

2011-06-27 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:01, Ted Ts'o wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it - either state that we want to fully support