Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 637764 + pending
Bug #637764 [linux-latest-2.6] linux-latest-2.6 [L10N,DE]: initial german
debconf translation
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637764:
Package: linux-tools-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal
I captured a few perf traces on a live system (using perf record --event
cpu-clock --freq 1000 -a --output=mylog.perf).
When I try to run a report on those perf logs, it segfaults. I can run it
under gdb and get a stacktrace (below).
Ben Hutchings wrote:
--- a/scripts/mkcompile_h
+++ b/scripts/mkcompile_h
@@ -58,6 +58,13 @@
if [ -n $SMP ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS=SMP; fi
if [ -n $PREEMPT ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS=$CONFIG_FLAGS PREEMPT; fi
UTS_VERSION=$UTS_VERSION $CONFIG_FLAGS $TIMESTAMP
+
+DISTRIBUTION=$(lsb_release -is
Hi again Jonathan,
Mike Hore wrote:
Ummm... Mac keyboards don't have scroll lock!
It seems that scroll lock is shift+f14.
Nope, that has no effect whatsoever.
Yes, single WAS there!! Let me double-check...
yes, what I said was what happened. Both single and quiet were there. The
Mike Hore wrote:
I don't know that I want to try any more -- I seem to be getting nowhere. I
think it might need someone who really understands the Debian boot process
to get their hands on a new iMac and sort this whole thing out. There are
plenty of them around by now. I've got a lot of
It works on my T42 with the 1.8 GHz version of this processor, using
lenny, squeeze and sid kernel versions. The BIOS version is 3.05a.
Maybe there was a regression in a later BIOS version?
Ben.
I have applied the newest BIOS version available at lenovo support for my
T42 (model 2374):
Hi Justin,
Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
I captured a few perf traces on a live system (using perf record --event
cpu-clock --freq 1000 -a --output=mylog.perf).
When I try to run a report on those perf logs, it segfaults. I can run it
under gdb and get a stacktrace (below).
I wasn't able to
Grzegorz Kochański rumi...@gmail.com writes:
It works on my T42 with the 1.8 GHz version of this processor, using
lenny, squeeze and sid kernel versions. The BIOS version is 3.05a.
Maybe there was a regression in a later BIOS version?
Ben.
I have applied the newest BIOS version available
Hi Jonathan,
Mike Hore wrote:
I don't know that I want to try any more -- I seem to be getting nowhere. I
think it might need someone who really understands the Debian boot process
to get their hands on a new iMac and sort this whole thing out. There are
plenty of them around by now. I've
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/bug/linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/include-network
include-network does a
for dir in /sys/class/net/*; do
...
cat $dir/features 3
but when bonding is active, there's also a file 'bonding_masters' under
/sys/class/net/ and
Hi again Jonathan,
Hmmm - interesting. I might check Ubuntu forums too.
The same problem has shown up there too:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1578342
Some fixes have been posted on that thread. I can't really take the
time to apply them all myself, but it probably suggests a
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:15, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
dunno how those pkg name version came out, I was referring to
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
File: /usr/share/bug/linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/include-network
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph,
Hi list,
each time I start up my laptop (Debian testing, Linux 3.0 as provided in the
repositories), the following error (warning?) appears:
[5.083819] shpchp :00:01.0: Cannot reserve MMIO region
The system is working fine as far as I can tell. I observed that message for
quite a
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 23:08 -0700, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Package: linux-tools-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal
I captured a few perf traces on a live system (using perf record
--event cpu-clock --freq 1000 -a --output=mylog.perf).
When I try to run a report on those perf
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:33 +0200, Grzegorz Kochański wrote:
It works on my T42 with the 1.8 GHz version of this processor,
using
lenny, squeeze and sid kernel versions. The BIOS version is
3.05a.
Maybe there was a regression in a later BIOS version?
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 12:15 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/bug/linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64/include-network
include-network does a
for dir in /sys/class/net/*; do
...
cat $dir/features 3
but when bonding is
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 12:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:15, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
dunno how those pkg name version came out, I was referring to
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
[...]
Kernel bugs usually apply to many
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:33 +0200, Grzegorz Kochański wrote:
It works on my T42 with the 1.8 GHz version of this processor,
using
lenny, squeeze and sid kernel versions. The BIOS version is
3.05a.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638956 + pending
Bug #638956 [linux-2.6] include-network bug script doesn't work in case of
bonding
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638956:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638956 + pending
Bug #638956 [linux-2.6] include-network bug script doesn't work in case of
bonding
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #638956 to the same tags previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 08:59 -0400, Michael Mastrogiacomo wrote:
Hello Ben, thanks for the reply.
Right, if autonegotiation fails then it is possible for 'parallel
detection' to establish a 100HD link. The question is why autoneg
failed.
I concur. I suspect the driver.
I should
Hello Ben, thanks for the reply.
Right, if autonegotiation fails then it is possible for 'parallel
detection' to establish a 100HD link. The question is why autoneg
failed.
I concur. I suspect the driver.
I should mention that this sounds like a similar issue:
So, does the system have firmware-netxen installed? If not, can you try
installing it and rebooting?
Yes:
# dpkg -l | grep -i netxen
ii firmware-netxen 0.28 Binary
firmware for QLogic Intelligent Ethernet (3000 and 3100 Series)
What does the
Hi Ralf, can you attach the complete dmesg log to the bug report,
please? I see a snippet (starting with Bluetooth: SCO socket layer
initialized), but there's a lot of useful information before that.
The dmesg command only shows the most recent part of the log, so if
the kernel's buffer has
Thanks! These tests:
if ((dev-vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD) || (dev-device ==
PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_GOLAM_7450))
are clearly wrong. I suspect was intended instead of ||, but
this code seems to have been that way since the beginning, so I
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:22:57 -0700
with message-id
cafoxkmqjwcredzzoim_cxrf7qjnf8a6nra601hizuu-0lah...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line linux-tools-3.0.0: perf report segfaults when using binary
version; compiling from source works
has caused the Debian Bug report #638938,
Mike Hore wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
at the moment, using the
squeeze installer and then upgrading is more likely to be reliable.
That was the first thing I tried a while ago -- then somebody suggested I
try the latest installer which is what I did.
Based on [1] it looks like the fix to
Ralf, can you attach your /proc/iomem contents, too? I looked at the
SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use message,
but I don't see why that address is in use.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Bjorn,
Ralf, can you attach your /proc/iomem contents, too? I looked at the
SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use message,
but I don't see why that address is in use.
Sure, you can find it attached.
I am getting some more kernel error messages during boot (that I
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much noise, so that various bug reports get
useless. if strong words didn't
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:58:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a
I don't think the fix in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15544
solved the problem for me. That fix was in 2.6.35-rc2, but the problem
happened for me even with the 2.6.36 kernel.
However, the good news is that the error is now gone; or rather the
error shows up but is cleared so
Here's a test patch for the TCO timer issue. That SP5100 watchdog
driver is a mess -- it gropes around at hard-coded places in I/O port
space -- so while I think this patch will fix the message, the
watchdog itself still may not work. If you can verify that the
watchdog works, that would be
Your error is SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xbafe00 already in
use. (Same error, but different address.) That looks like it's in
the middle of your RAM, i.e., it looks completely bogus. Given the
ugliness of the sp5100_tco driver, that doesn't surprise me. Possibly
the BIOS configured it
Reject Reasons:
linux-2.6 - temporary reject for package re-sign
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Reject Reasons:
linux-2.6 - temporary reject for package re-sign
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:17 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-35
Severity: important
Hello,
we've had several server-class machine (G6 and G7 HP Proliant blades) affected
by the kernel bug mentioned in the subject.
On the console we can see several several
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638984 + moreinfo
Bug #638984 [linux-2.6] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [kswapd0:188]
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638984:
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 10:12 -0400, Michael Mastrogiacomo wrote:
[...]
root@odin:~# ethtool -i eth3
driver: netxen_nic
version: 4.0.50
firmware-version: 4.0.555
bus-info: :06:00.3
Note, the above is one of the few ethtool commands/options that actually
work.
I'd consider
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 16:27 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
The current stable version is 2.6.32-35; please upgrade.
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream
Dear Debian folks,
with Linux kernel 2.6.32 the following message is shown on each boot.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 637659 + pending
Bug #637659 [linux-2.6] pci :00:00.0: BAR 0: address space collision on of
device [0xc800-0xcfff]
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637659:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 635840 - moreinfo
Bug #635840 [firmware-free] Missing firmware for carl9170 driver
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
635840:
reassign 639092 linux-2.6 2.6.32-30
forcemerge 636797 639092
tags 636797 + upstream
quit
Hi,
Bjoern Boschman wrote:
After running this kernel for about ~200 days I got the attached
kernel-oops.
I'm filling this bugreport as this has happened quite often on different
machines in the last
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 639092 linux-2.6 2.6.32-30
Bug #639092 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] Kernel-oops while find_busiest_group
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:37PM -0700, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Do they need help from the community
instead to help define, implement, and maintain this for them?
I think the answer is yes.
to expand on this a bit.
it's a lot easier to
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Aug 17, 2011, at 00:33, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
I'd like to echo Ben's sentiment, particularly in the area of automotive.
A car has to be supported with parts
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 21:55 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Friday 12 August 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:36 -0300, Willian Gustavo Veiga wrote:
Ben, probably you're right. I've missed some information, sorry about
that:
# dmesg
[
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 17:24 +0200, xavier.x.la...@externe.bnpparibas.com
wrote:
[...]
This message and any attachments (the message) is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 637560 + moreinfo
Bug #637560 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: CIFS / DFS regression since
2.6.39-2-amd64: unable to mount a dfs or cifs subtree of a share
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
50 matches
Mail list logo
