retitle 641665 915GM (Eee PC 900): fonts have some corrupted glyphs:
strikethrough
# [1]
forwarded 641665 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36326
affects 641665 + xserver-xorg-video-intel
quit
Hi,
Vítor De Araújo wrote:
> I'm sending a screenshot of an affected screen attached. In th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 641665 915GM (Eee PC 900): fonts have some corrupted glyphs:
> strikethrough
Bug #641665 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: i915 rendering problems;
affects font rendering in some X11 apps
Changed Bug title to '915GM (Eee PC 900):
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, maximilian attems wrote:
tags 628444 moreinfo
stop
This bug actually applies to all Debian kernels I have tried including
2.6.36, 2.6.37, 2.6.38, and 2.6,39
Did you try since newer 3.0 images, how are they performing?
thank you
I wasn't aware that the 3.0 kernels were
Hello Ben,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:03:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 16:04 +0200, Jeroen Schot wrote:
> [...]
> > msgid ""
> > "Debian's '686' kernel configuration has been replaced by the '686-pae' "
> > "configuration, which uses PAE (Physical Address Extension). Ho
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:17 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 09/11/2011 05:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 01:18 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> >> On 09/08/2011 07:12 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > In the meantime disabling sendpage sounds like the
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 06:28 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> reassign 641429 linux-2.6
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:19:06AM +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 00:50 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> >
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
* What led up to the situation?
I compile the above c file with gcc -m64 option
#include
int main()
{
return 0;
}
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
upgrade to testing.
Hi,
there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
nobody follow the report and it was closed.
As Adam baked said [1] :
A long time ago (~ 10 years), Intel produced a chipset that
included brok
Package: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64
Version: 3.0.0-3
Error Message: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PGRAPH: unsupported
chipset, please report!
[ 17.227473] nouveau :02:00.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LNED] -> GSI 19
(level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 17.227477] nouveau :02:00.0: setting latency t
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
> places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
> nobody follow the report and it was closed.
>
> As Adam bake
reassign 641697 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-3
# cosmetic
severity 641697 minor
quit
Hi,
Hor Jiun Shyong wrote:
> Error Message: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PGRAPH: unsupported chipset,
> please report!
So, which chipset is it? :)
Please attach output from "/usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script 3>&1"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641697 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-3
Bug #641697 [linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PGRAPH:
unsupported chipset, please report!
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked
Hi again,
sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
nobody follow the report and it was closed.
As Adam Baker said [1] :
A long time ago (~
Hi again,
sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
nobody follow the report and it was closed.
As Adam Baker said [1] :
A long time ago (~
You need to install gcc-multilib. If you already have it installed,
this is bug #638418.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
All extremists should be taken out and shot.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641694 gcc-multilib
Bug #641694 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: unable to compile with -m64 and
errno.h
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-libc-dev' to 'gcc-multilib'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.0.0-3.
> force
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:41:14PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
>
> there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
> places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
> n
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
>
> there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
> places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
> nobody follow
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
> wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
>>
>> there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
>> places) some time ag
The description of nasty problem that lead to this patch
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9901.2/1285.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debia
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #638609 (http://bugs.debian.org/638609)
# Bug title: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd
Hi,
Greg KH wrote:
> You can not add someone else's signed-off-by: line to a patch, please go
> re-read Documentation/SubmittingPatches as to why.
>
> And did Adam originally write this patch? Or did you? If Adam, please
> set the authorship information properly.
>From a quick Google search:
Package: firmware-atheros
Version: 0.33
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This is my device:
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0cf3:3000 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011 Bluetooth
(no firmware)
It does not turn on and kern.log shows following errors:
[9.335184] ath3k_load_firmware: Can't chang
On Thursday 15 September 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg KH wrote:
> > You can not add someone else's signed-off-by: line to a patch, please go
> > re-read Documentation/SubmittingPatches as to why.
> >
> > And did Adam originally write this patch? Or did you? If Adam, please
> > se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Version: 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 635580 - moreinfo
Bug #635580 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: lenovo ideapad v570 LCD
brightness doesn't change
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> foun
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # v2.6.32.30
> tags 641419 + upstream
Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves
incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data
Added tag(s) upstream.
> # On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:22:39PM +0100, Mike Ashton
Hi,
Tomi Leppänen wrote:
> I tried with 3.0.0-1-486 (from wheezy) but it didn't work much better,
> but at least something changed:
> dmesg |grep BAR
[...]
> [0.090632] pnp 00:00: disabling [mem 0x0010-0x1ffe] because it
> overlaps :01:00.0 BAR 0 [mem 0x-0x0fff pref]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641176 - moreinfo
Bug #641176 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Radeon 9200SE, Detected VRAM
RAM=0M, BAR=0M
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> # probably 3.0.0-3, but whatever :)
> found 641176 linux-2.6/3.0.0-1
Bug #641176 [linux-2.6] xserver-
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:09 -0400, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> Package: firmware-atheros
> Version: 0.33
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> This is my device:
>
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0cf3:3000 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011
> Bluetooth (no firmware)
>
> It does not turn on a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Assume this version is also affected
> reassign 641749 linux-2.6 3.0.0-3
Bug #641749 [firmware-atheros] firmware-atheros doesn't load for Atheros AR3011
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-atheros' to 'linux-2.6'.
Failed to clear fixed version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641419 + pending
Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves
incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640115 + pending
Bug #640115 [linux-latest-2.6] linux-latest-2.6: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation of
debconf templates
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640115: http://bugs.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Assume this version is also affected
> reassign 641749 linux-2.6 3.0.0-3
Bug #641749 [linux-2.6] firmware-atheros doesn't load for Atheros AR3011
Ignoring request to reassign bug #641749 to the same package
Bug #641749 [linux-2.6] firmware-ather
33 matches
Mail list logo