fixed 577054 linux-2.6/2.6.32-35squeeze2
found 577054 linux-2.6/2.6.32-9
quit
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
I'm sending you the logs requested. I can't remember anything about when
the problem was fixed...
Thanks again, and sorry for the noise.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 577054 linux-2.6/2.6.32-35squeeze2
Bug #577054 {Done: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com} [linux-2.6] acpi:
After upgrade, computer does not turn off
Bug Marked as fixed in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-35squeeze2.
found 577054
Sep 26 07:26:57 srv03044 kernel: [ 373.475130] Pid: 5200, comm: nmbd
Not tainted 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64 #1
Sep 26 07:26:57 srv03044 kernel: [ 373.475131] Call Trace:
Sep 26 07:26:57 srv03044 kernel: [ 373.475135] [812a1d5b] ?
udp_sendmsg+0x5b9/0x69c
Sep 26 07:26:57 srv03044 kernel: [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Taking some bugs off the radar.
#
# Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/538158
# Submitter: Arcady Genkin agen...@cdf.toronto.edu
# Submitter: Juan Miguel Corral Cano cde_ruylo...@yahoo.es
# Summary: [lenny] soft lockup in default_idle
# Status:
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.5-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have found a bug on upgrading nfs-common that might be nfs-common
init script header or insserv related:
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading nfs-common when nfs-common and (!) rpcbind is disabled in
On 28/09/11 11:09, John Hughes wrote:
I think you're right about the problems now being userspace.
I feel that the hang after thaw problems I'm seeing are caused by
krb5 - it seems to like to get itself into a situation where it has no
krb5 ticket so it can't access my home directory which
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# hangs in processors test of pm_test (i.e., offlining or onlining
# nonboot cpus). Waiting for more data from John upstream. Many
# thanks to John and Uwe for their work so far.
forwarded 643301
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:29:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 03:51 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-35
Severity: normal
The stack trace can be seen below; if it matters, note that the machine
a) is running under KVM, b) has
Seconded. Also reported in [1]. The status of this issue is also the
same in Wheezy's linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 and experimental's
linux-image-3.1.0-rc7-amd64_3.1.0~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb
I haven't been able to figure out if enabling CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP adds
any overhead at all. Are there
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5~bpo60+1
Justification: breaks the whole system
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i upstream
The system (independient of kernel even backport version or oficial ) hangs,
and stops,
i investigated with dmesg, and so then found this trace :
irq 10: nobody cared (try
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hello,
When I try to execute:
ifconfig eth0 mtu 4000 up
or
ifconfig eth0 mtu 7198 up
my nic stops working and changing back to mtu 1500 does not help.
To use my nic again I have to execute:
rmmod jme
modprome jme
and the the
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:34:30PM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5~bpo60+1
[...]
What about 3.0 (currently in testing and unstable)?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
err currently i'm prefer stable.. this trend for lasted software its a
windoze think
i' talking ab out stable kernel bug, what about that?
i'm running 2.6.39, quite more stable, but previosly i update alsa state of
mixer, and also install a few packages..but acpi also fail with 2.6.39 too,
and
Hi,
PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
i' talking ab out stable kernel bug, what about that?
A 3.x kernel (to help us debug, not as a long-term solution) should
not require any dependencies except for linux-base and initramfs-tools
from outside squeeze.
[...]
but acpi also fail with 2.6.39 too,
and
ok thanks,
i will test again, currently 2.6.39 works well, more stable and do not
hang too much,
but what about squeeze brand 2.6.32, this fails too!
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
i' talking ab out stable kernel
PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
i will test again, currently 2.6.39 works well, more stable and do not
hang too much,
... when you add the acpi=off boot-time parameter. I wouldn't call
that working.
but what about squeeze brand 2.6.32, this fails too!
Actually, we don't care about 2.6.39 at all,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
i will test again, currently 2.6.39 works well, more stable and do not
hang too much,
... when you add the acpi=off boot-time parameter. I wouldn't call
that working.
ok obviously this its
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:22:17PM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
err currently i'm prefer stable.. this trend for lasted software its a
windoze think
i' talking ab out stable kernel bug, what about that?
[...]
I'm asking you to test 3.0, to see whether the bug has been fixed
upstream. I
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
but what about squeeze brand 2.6.32, this fails too!
Actually, we don't care about 2.6.39 at all, except when it is relevant
to fixing 2.6.32 or 3.x.
Ah, sorry, that was less helpful than it should have been. I didn't
actually answer your
right - _finally_ i've encountered a requirement to upgrade a 2nd
system that has lvm2 and (in this 2nd case 2.6.18-486) a linux kernel
image, and have encountered the *exact* same problem as is in bugs
636123 and 638896. this time, however, i was anticipating that
something might go wrong, so
20 matches
Mail list logo
