* Ben Hutchings [111007 15:23 +0100]:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:26 +0200, Simone Rossetto wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > The Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/597897 is a RFP for alsa-firmwares.
> >
> > I read every email related to this package on the debian-kernel
> > mailing-list [1], but I
> >
Good news everyone!
I found it that the problem is that the SATA controller, which is not in
AHCI mode. Adding setpci -d 8086:2828 90.b=40 in grub.cfg resolves the
problem.
for further information look at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drives
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 644281 openshot
Bug #644281 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: problem after changing mtu
size on jme kernel module
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'openshot'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.0-3.
> found 644
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 644821 openshot
Bug #644821 {Done: Patrick Matthäi } [wnpp] RFP:
openshot -- Openshot 1.4.0-1
Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'openshot'.
> found 644821 1.4.0-1
Bug #644821 {Done: Patrick Matthäi } [openshot] RFP:
openshot -- Op
I am still encountering this problem, usually triggered by
popularity-contest (#640974)
root@avalon:/home/kjotte# uname -a
Linux avalon 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 09:15:47 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
kjotte@avalon:~$ cat /proc/1/maps
from /var/log/syslog:
Oct 9 10:11:55 avalon kernel: [2564273.
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 10:23 -0400, Kevin Otte wrote:
> I am still encountering this problem, usually triggered by
> popularity-contest (#640974)
>
> root@avalon:/home/kjotte# uname -a
> Linux avalon 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 09:15:47 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
[...]
That's version 2.6.32-35sque
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 17:11 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [111007 15:23 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:26 +0200, Simone Rossetto wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > The Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/597897 is a RFP for alsa-firmwares.
> > >
> > > I read every email r
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:40:01PM +0200, Bart Hartgers wrote:
> Does this new version make any difference? To confuse you, I did not
> include a version number in the filenames ;-).
Sorry for the delay in answering. Since my main 'scope has a video
problem which I don't want to exacerbate by runn
Yep, that was it. Humble apologies for the noise.
On 10/09/2011 11:25 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 10:23 -0400, Kevin Otte wrote:
>> I am still encountering this problem, usually triggered by
>> popularity-contest (#640974)
>>
>> root@avalon:/home/kjotte# uname -a
>> Linux aval
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-38
Severity: normal
Hi all,
after upgrading my Sheeva plug from Debian 6.0.2 to 6.0.3 also the kernel
version
2.6.32-38 was installed. Since then my two Western Digital
USB harddisk are no longer recognised. The kernel is reporting:
[ 232.030408] scsi_mod: Un
Hi,
Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-38
[...]
> Linux version 2.6.32-5-kirkwood (Debian 2.6.32-30) (b...@decadent.org.uk)
> (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 Wed Jan 12 15:27:07 UTC 2011
Was the new kernel flashed correctly? Does rebooting help?
--
To UN
Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> Mmmh, I am quite sure that I didn't see any error message when running
> the upgrade to 6.0.3, and I can find those messages in /var/log/dpkg.log ...
>
> 2011-10-09 17:27:03 configure linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood 2.6.32-38
> 2.6.32-38
> 2011-10-09 17:27:03 status unpacked
On 10/09/2011 07:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
>
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.32-38
> [...]
>> Linux version 2.6.32-5-kirkwood (Debian 2.6.32-30) (b...@decadent.org.uk)
>> (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 Wed Jan 12 15:27:07 UTC 2011
>
> Was the
On 11-10-09 at 08:07pm, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> On the other hand: if the previous kernel was still in place why would
> it suddenly fail?
I believe the answer to above is that the new kernel did not change ABI
and therefore modules got installed instead of the old ones (not aside
them) - caus
FYI: the upstream fix for this issue has been pulled into the linux-next
tree. Not sure if this is upstream enough for the kernel team to backport to
3.0 or 3.1 yet, but I was able to cherry-pick the series into 3.0 with no
conflicts.
https://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next/commits/master/drivers
On 10/09/2011 08:16 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
>
>> Mmmh, I am quite sure that I didn't see any error message when running
>> the upgrade to 6.0.3, and I can find those messages in /var/log/dpkg.log ...
>>
>> 2011-10-09 17:27:03 configure linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood 2.6.
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 21:24 +0200, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 08:16 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> >
> >> Mmmh, I am quite sure that I didn't see any error message when running
> >> the upgrade to 6.0.3, and I can find those messages in /var/log/dpkg.log
> >>
After upgrading to Debian 6.0.3 I rebooted straight away, ending up with the
issue I mentioned. Rebooting again did not help, I had to run flash-kernel to
fix things...
Regards, Joerg.
Ben Hutchings schrieb:
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 21:24 +0200, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 08:16 PM,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 644850 initramfs-tools 0.98.8
Bug #644850 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: 2.6.32-38 does not
recognise USB harddisks any longer
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Bug No longer marked as found in ver
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 22:02 +0200, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> After upgrading to Debian 6.0.3 I rebooted straight away, ending up
> with the issue I mentioned. Rebooting again did not help, I had to run
> flash-kernel to fix things...
Seems like this could be a bug in initramfs-tools. I've reassign
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Was this reproducible? If so, is it still? Colin, could you send
> kernel messages from the similar event you experienced (as a followup
> to this report if it involved plugging in a mouse after hibernate, or
> as a new report otherwise)?
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-38
Compiling e1000e-1.4.4 and above against linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64
2.6.32-38 fails:
root@Coentro:/usr/local/src/e1000e-1.4.4/src#
BUILD_KERNEL=2.6.32-5-amd64 make
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/build
SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/e1000e-1
Colin wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
> Besides not having access to this hardware anymore, if I had the kernel would
> be version 3.0 as I normally run -testing.
> Sorry for not being more helpful in this case.
No problem, and thanks for the update.
Incidentally, the squeeze kernel runs fine on wheezy
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
Severity: important
Dear kernelteam,
After installing a vanilla debian kernel (2.6.32-5-amd64) to 2 similar USB
thumbdrives in software RAID1 and using LVM2 an error occurs at boot stating
ROOT can not be found. In my case / is locted on an lv managed b
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:56:30 +0100
with message-id <1318204595.4024.142.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#644871: Compiling e1000e-1.4.4 and above against
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64 2.6.32-38 fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #644871,
regarding Compiling e1000e-1.4.4
After reading the Ubuntu bug report (#794642) I found that this Debian bug is
also due to the SATA mode in my computer being set to IDE. When this is changed
to AHCI the problem vanishes: /dev/cdrom appears.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:04:41 +0530 wrote
>On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 04:36 +, R S Cha
26 matches
Mail list logo
