Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 578912 linux-2.6/2.6.32-21
Bug #578912 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-4-686: soft lockups with radeon KMS
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-21.
> retitle 578912 [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS
Bug #578912 [linux-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 605472 + moreinfo
Bug #605472 [linux-2.6] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
605472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607288 + moreinfo
Bug #607288 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Laptop won't resume after
suspend to disk
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607288: http://bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607533 + moreinfo
Bug #607533 [linux-2.6] udev hangs at boot for 180 sec because of a "C$R570"
bios version
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607533: http://bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 609926 + moreinfo
Bug #609926 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-686: resume from disk reboots
sometimes
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
609926: http://bugs.
On 02/01/12 19:38, Nader wrote:
Hello People:
I am a present Linux user and a computer enthusiast of a long time.
Through my long experience with computers and recently Linux I have
come across some points that I firmly believe that can make a
difference in Linux's popularity.
I am attaching th
On 02/02/12 01:08, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Guy Roussin wrote:
I have a Dell laptop and i get the same bug : no more sound with kernel 3.2.
Is the patch fix this problem on Dell laptop?
No, it's for Asus machines only. Please file a separate bug.
Thanks much,
Jonathan
No, it maybe the sam
I updated yesterday this faulty machine with latest
linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 (version 3.2.2-1) and I can confirm that this
bug is still present.
Is there a boot option I can try to get rid of this messages and what
is causing them?
TIA.
Antonio Corbi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kerne
hi,
uname -a
2.6.32 #3 SMP Wed Feb 1 14:41:07 CET 2012 sparc64 GNU/Linux
with self compiled kernel, but with Debian sources:
linux-source-2.6.32 2.6.32-41
-
[ 95.380528] mdadm: sending ioctl 20001261 to a partition!
[ 95.451590] mdadm: sending ioctl
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:28 +0530, dE . wrote:
[...]
> Also you should discuss about this in the debian-project and
> debian-desktop mailing lists -- you left these 2, they were the most
> relevant.
I think the most appropriate forum would be Nader's blog.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #657302 (http://bugs.debian.org/657302)
# Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: No m
Hello,
sorry for not coming back to you earlier, I did not have access to the
oscilloscope until now. The issue is resolved by the folowing commit to
the kernel:
108e02b12921078a59dcacd048079ece48a4a983
(usb-ftdi_sio-fix-initial-baud-rate.patch)
Applying this as a patch to the kernel solves
tags 658164 + upstream patch fixed-upstream
quit
Andreas Fried wrote:
> sorry for not coming back to you earlier, I did not have access to the
> oscilloscope until now. The issue is resolved by the folowing commit to
> the kernel:
>
> 108e02b12921078a59dcacd048079ece48a4a983
> (usb-ftdi_sio-f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658164 + upstream patch fixed-upstream
Bug #658164 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: Baud rate of FTDI
USB-to-serial converter not initialized
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
I'm seeing these issues as well.
The Ubuntu guys pulled the two upstream patches into their 2.6.32
build, and the RedHat guys did the same in their 2.6.35 and 2.6.38
builds. Is there anything preventing us from pulling in the patches
too?
Aman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ.
Hi,
When doing kernel packaging bits work I often find it useful to hack the
package to only build a subset of the normal flavours (for speed etc).
However since udeb support was added this has stopped working (example
below for building only the kirkwood flavour on armel). The problem is
that we
Hi, linux-image was updated today from 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 in sid and broke
sensors for it87 chip.
Before the update, messages said:
Feb 2 08:09:55 debian kernel: [ 11.269884] it87: Found IT8705F chip at
0x290, revision 2
Feb 2 08:09:55 debian kernel: [ 11.269895] it87: Beeping is supported
Feb
Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:21:35 -0600
with message-id <20120202212135.GA23410@burratino>
and subject line Re: Unable to scan anymore with a Fujitsu fi-4340C since
squeeze update
has caused the Debian Bug report #629155,
regarding Unable to scan anymore with a Fujitsu fi-4340C since squ
found 620297 linux-2.6/2.6.32-30
found 620297 linux-2.6/2.6.32-36
tags 620297 + patch moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Aman Gupta wrote:
> The Ubuntu guys pulled the two upstream patches into their 2.6.32
> build, and the RedHat guys did the same in their 2.6.35 and 2.6.38
> builds. Is there anything preventin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 620297 linux-2.6/2.6.32-30
Bug #620297 [linux-2.6] base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-30.
> found 620297 linux-2.6/2.6.32-36
Bug #620297 [linux-2.6] base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagre
found 656724 linux-2.6/3.2.2-1
# regression
severity 656724 important
merge 657526 656724
quit
Hi,
Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
> [Subject: Bug#656724: bug still present with kernel 3.2.2-1]
Please keep in mind that this appears as the subject line of an email
in a crowded inbox, so it can b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 656724 linux-2.6/3.2.2-1
Bug #656724 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: After installing this kernel
syslogd reports a call trace always the same: Code: c0 89 c5 ...
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.2-1.
> # regression
> se
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:18 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> The current approach of having a kernel patch package seems to work well.
Phew... well there are many people running at >stable... and for
them it does not... as the package seems more or less orphaned.
Also,.. configuring something com
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:55:59AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:18 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The current approach of having a kernel patch package seems to work well.
> Phew... well there are many people running at >stable... and for
> them it does not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 658401 linux-2.6
Bug #658401 [base] base: Atheros AR9285 Wi-Fi adapter not working on HP 630
notebook with Wheezy
Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:34 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There is an easy way to benefit from it.
Well still the user wouldn't know how to configure it...
Actually I must admit that I haven't followed PaX/grsec now for some
time (mainly due to the deb package being always out of date in sid).
Was
reassign 658401 linux-2.6
thanks
On Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2012, Illés Gábor wrote:
> Package: base
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>* What exactly did you do (or not do)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Wasn't it once the case with PaX that packages have to be compiled
> specially? Or some ELF headers added or so?
Some shared libraries have code which can't be run without an executable
stack, it's a small number of libraries that are written
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:06:05AM -0600, Robert Keevil wrote:
> > Package: cpufrequtils
> > Version: 007-2
> > Severity: no
Source: mkvmlinuz
Version: 35
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
Please find attached an updated po-debconf translation of this package into
indonesian.
$ msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null id.po
id.po: 2 translated messages
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 18:56 -0200, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
> Hi, linux-image was updated today from 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 in sid and broke
> sensors for it87 chip.
> Before the update, messages said:
>
>
> Feb 2 08:09:55 debian kernel: [ 11.269884] it87: Found IT8705F chip
> at 0x290, revision 2
> Feb
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 20:37 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When doing kernel packaging bits work I often find it useful to hack the
> package to only build a subset of the normal flavours (for speed etc).
You can fairly easily build individual binary packages using the targets
defined in de
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 16:00 +0100, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> uname -a
>
> 2.6.32 #3 SMP Wed Feb 1 14:41:07 CET 2012 sparc64 GNU/Linux
>
> with self compiled kernel, but with Debian sources:
>
> linux-source-2.6.32 2.6.32-41
>
> -
> [ 95.380528] m
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 03:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 16:00 +0100, Denny Schierz wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > uname -a
> >
> > 2.6.32 #3 SMP Wed Feb 1 14:41:07 CET 2012 sparc64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > with self compiled kernel, but with Debian sources:
> >
> > linux-source-2.6.3
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> > http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:06:05AM -0600, Robert Keevil
This bug just got introduced into squeeze-backports with the inclusion
of the 3.2-kernel.
BR,
Andreas
mån 2012-01-23 klockan 14:40 +0100 skrev Marco d'Itri:
> On Dec 16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > There have been a few iwlwifi fixes upstream recently. Could you
> > try[1] v3.2-rc5 or later?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fri Feb 3 07:03:35 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: linux-2.6
> tags 657112 + pending
Bug #657112 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux-
hi Ben,
Am 03.02.2012 um 04:45 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
>
> Does the attached patch fix this? This change should be in the longterm
> update 2.6.32.56 and we can put it into a stable update pretty soon if
> necessary.
as you said, the patch changes nothing:
== Booting ===
39 matches
Mail list logo
