Bug#669342: initramfs-tools should conflicts to dracut

2012-04-19 Thread Thomas Lange
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.101 Severity: minor Since dracut uses the same file name for the initrd and dracut is a replacement for initramfs-tools, it should conflict to dracut. The dracut package already conflicts to initramfs-tools. -- regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#669345: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs: not found

2012-04-19 Thread Thomas Lange
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.101 Severity: minor Tags: patch When I install dracut - which conflicts to initramfs-tools - initramfs-tools will be removed. But when doing a dpkg-reconfigure the script /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools is still executed, which lead to following error:

Bug#669342: initramfs-tools should conflicts to dracut

2012-04-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:01 +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.101 > Severity: minor > > Since dracut uses the same file name for the initrd and dracut is a > replacement for initramfs-tools, it should conflict to dracut. > > The dracut package already conflicts to

Processed: severity of 669345 is important

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 669345 important Bug #669345 [initramfs-tools] /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs: not found Severity set to 'important' from 'minor' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#660111: Bug#664653 pulseaudio: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices -- chooses wrong default

2012-04-19 Thread Andres Cimmarusti
tags 664653 fixed-upstream thanks Pulseaudio upstream version 1.99.1 (or master, specifically after commit e02cb7fb2e7865affed612693935c7fd698e3a6b) contains all the necessary bits to allow the user to select from several HDMI devices advertised by the kernel. Please consider packaging. Andres

Bug#669335: [PATCH 2.6.32.y] x86/mm: Fix pgd_lock deadlock

2012-04-19 Thread Jonathan Nieder
reassign 669335 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-41squeeze2 tags 669335 + upstream patch quit Hi Philipp, Philipp Hahn wrote: > We received several problem reports from our customers and also > experienced the following bug when running said kernel with >=2 CPUs in > a virtualization environbment (KVM and V

Processed: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32.y] x86/mm: Fix pgd_lock deadlock

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 669335 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-41squeeze2 Bug #669335 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem: 86-mm-Fix-pgd_lock-deadlock.patch Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem' to 'src:linux-2.6'. No

Processed: Re: pa can't handle multiple HDMI devices -- chooses wrong default

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Andres Cimmarusti wrote: > # > tags 664653 fixed-upstream > # > # Yep. > tags 660111 - fixed-upstream Bug #660111 [linux-2.6] multiple, non-physically accesible, HDMI devices Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream. > End of message, stopping processing h

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2012-04-19 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #616559 (http://bugs.debian.org/616559) # Bug title: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck

Bug#667446: closed by Ben Hutchings (Bug#667446: fixed in linux-2.6 3.2.15-1)

2012-04-19 Thread Hans Henry von Tresckow
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the linux-2.6 package: > > #667446: linux-image-3.2.0-2-orion5x: leds-gpio fails on MV2120 > > It has been closed by Ben Hutchings . > > Their

Bug#665881: [3.1 -> 3.2.12 regression] module ath5k is blocking wlan-card

2012-04-19 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Hi Jonathan, today I tested with the old bpo-kernel, but sadly I could not manage to get this bug shown again, neither with pcie= nor without pcie= addition. But what i can say: This bug is gone! I have now rebooted almost 20 times and it never appeared a single time. IMO that bugreport can sa

Bug#665881: [3.1 -> 3.2.12 regression] module ath5k is blocking wlan-card

2012-04-19 Thread Jonathan Nieder
unmerge 665881 notforwarded 665881 notfixed 665881 linux-2.6/3.2.14-1 , linux-2.6/3.3.2-1~experimental.1 tags 665881 = upstream unreproducible quit Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > today I tested with the old bpo-kernel, but sadly I could not manage to get > this bug shown again Thank

Processed: Re: [3.1 -> 3.2.12 regression] module ath5k is blocking wlan-card

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 665881 Bug #665881 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: module ath5k is blocking wlan-card Bug #665420 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: pata_jmicron hdd/dvd/cdrom drives not detecte

Bug#666108: Dell PERC H710P is not supported by Squeeze Standard Kernel

2012-04-19 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Buford Peek wrote: > So far everything is looking good..We do NOT run a stock config so I > have recompiled the kernel with our specific config and will run LTP > testing on the system to determine if their are any more issues. Thanks again. How did it go? (Ben, if it worked well for them

RE: Basic question on debian kernel versions

2012-04-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 00:55 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote: > Ben, > Thanks that clarifies a lot. > > I do intend to provide updates to driver. Some quick questions. I know > need to figure this myself but am running round > In circles. > - Can you give me a pointer to latest debian ke

Bug#669335: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem: 86-mm-Fix-pgd_lock-deadlock.patch

2012-04-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 08:48 +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote: [...] > I thinks this patch should be applied to all flavours. It doesn't apply > to the non-xen-flavour as is, because it depends on some other > xen-related patch. Agreed. > The Patch was also back-ported to the OpenSUSE Kernel >