Bug#678636: initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot

2012-06-23 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.106 Severity: critical Tags: upstream Justification: breaks the whole system After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs prompt comes before the keypass has to been normally asked for to decrypt my root partition with the

Bug#678636: initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot

2012-06-23 Thread Touko Korpela
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.106 Severity: critical Tags: upstream Justification: breaks the whole system After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs prompt comes before the keypass

Bug#678636: initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot

2012-06-23 Thread Touko Korpela
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: -- /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md50 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sde1[5] 625137664 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU] bitmap: 1/3 pages [4KB], 65536KB

Bug#678636: Acknowledgement (initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot)

2012-06-23 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Hello, I tried to use older initramfs-tools 0.103 by reinstalling them with dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/initramfs-tools_0.103_all.deb update-initramfs -k all -u All installed kernee have still the same problem so I guess it could comes not only from initramfs-tool. Now I will reinstall

linux_3.2.21-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: linux-doc-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb to main/l/linux/linux-doc-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb linux-manual-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb to main/l/linux/linux-manual-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb linux-source-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb to main/l/linux/linux-source-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb

Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs

2012-06-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Re: Bug#676921: ITP: amd64-microcode -- Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs

2012-06-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sat,

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-23 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Camaleón wrote: the last (yesterday?) set of updates for wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail-notification are segfaulting as crazy horses. I'm attaching the syslog. This is

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-23 Thread Camaleón
El 2012-06-23 a las 12:05 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió: Camaleón wrote: the last (yesterday?) set of updates for wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail-notification are

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-23 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Camaleón wrote: El 2012-06-23 a las 12:05 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió: Camaleón wrote: the last (yesterday?) set of updates for wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and

Bug#676515: linux-2.6: AppArmor totally broken

2012-06-23 Thread intrigeri
Hi John, John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) : On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need to store the kern flag for later use by aa_revalidate_sk()? For how apparmor is generally deployed it can get away

Bug#676515: linux-2.6: AppArmor totally broken

2012-06-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 20:53 +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi John, John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) : On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need to store the kern flag for later use by aa_revalidate_sk()?

Bug#678696: Event based block device handling (fixes USB and nested devices problem)

2012-06-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.106 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, the attached patch adds an event based loop for block devices to the init script. New blockdevices are recorded in /run/initramfs/block-events by an udev rule as they appear. The init script repeadately waits for that and

Bug#676515: linux-2.6: AppArmor totally broken

2012-06-23 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Ben Hutchings wrote (23 Jun 2012 19:02:06 GMT) : What is it that you think will happen at the freeze? We stop fixing all bugs and do nothing for the next few months? Of course, and we'll lazily eat lots of icecream while you work hard to release many shiny new Linux 3.2.x :) Irony set

Bug#678696: Event based block device handling (fixes USB and nested devices problem)

2012-06-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I filed bugs for cryptsetup, lvm, mdadm and multipath-tools to support this solution (i.e. provide scripts/local-block/ sniplets) [#678688 #678691 #678692 #678693]. If anyone wants to test this prior to those packages being fixed the scriplets below can be used. MfG Goswin ==

Bug#676515: linux-2.6: AppArmor totally broken

2012-06-23 Thread John Johansen
On 06/23/2012 11:53 AM, intrigeri wrote: Hi John, John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) : On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need to store the kern flag for later use by aa_revalidate_sk()? For how

Bug#676515: linux-2.6: AppArmor totally broken

2012-06-23 Thread John Johansen
On 06/23/2012 12:30 PM, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Ben Hutchings wrote (23 Jun 2012 19:02:06 GMT) : What is it that you think will happen at the freeze? We stop fixing all bugs and do nothing for the next few months? Of course, and we'll lazily eat lots of icecream while you work hard to

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-23 Thread Camaleón
El 2012-06-23 a las 12:23 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió: Camaleón wrote: I noticed there was a new kernel update but as I was centered in this bug report I had configured GRUB to directly boot the older kernel. I'm going to leave the system for a while with the new kernel loaded to

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-23 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Camaleón wrote: I'll keep testing brcmsmac with the upstream branch (mainline and unstable) so yes, if you have a kernel in your radar you think I could try just tell and I'll go with it. Ok, cool. Here's my favorite kernel for the moment: v3.2.21 + patches 1-10 from

Bug#660994: Whats up! I am searching for for boyfriend!

2012-06-23 Thread Cybill Goldston
Good afternoon! I discovered your primary photo. I'm keen on you a lot. Let us communicate! I'm a girl and only serious about a male -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Processed: severity of 678636 is normal

2012-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 678636 normal Bug #678636 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: reassign 614170 to src:linux-2.6, affects 614170, reassign 627646 to src:linux-tools ...

2012-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 614170 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-30 Bug #614170 [usbip] usbip: attaching 2 identical devices requires delay Bug reassigned from package 'usbip' to 'src:linux-2.6'. No longer marked as found in versions usbip/0.1.7-3. Ignoring request to alter

Processing of linux-tools_3.2.17-1_multi.changes

2012-06-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-tools_3.2.17-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-tools_3.2.17-1.dsc linux-tools_3.2.17.orig.tar.gz linux-tools_3.2.17-1.debian.tar.gz linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb usbip_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb

linux-tools_3.2.17-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb to main/l/linux-tools/libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb to main/l/linux-tools/linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb linux-tools-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb to main/l/linux-tools/linux-tools-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb

Re: Debian and Hyper-V VM drivers

2012-06-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 16:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] The problems I've found so far (by inspection): 1. The daemon leaks a file handle on every configuration update. Fixed by the attached 'tools-hv-fix-file-handle-leak.patch' 2. It doesn't check for write failures, and it doesn't