On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:01:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> For example, gcc will not create a small stack frame with "sub
> $8,%rsp". No, what gcc does is to use a random "push" instruction.
> Fair enough, but that really makes things much harder to see. Here's
> an example:
That is because
Hi,
Please have a look at upstream bug report:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61799
I was asked to test GCC 4.8 and found this issue go away with
locally-recompiled GCC 4.8.2 (upstream source, as ia64 is no more
supported by Debian).
Whether this was expected or not, I don't know.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #686636 [linux] Please backport virtio-scsi to wheezy
Added tag(s) patch.
--
686636: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686636
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Control: tag -1 patch
Ron (2014-07-26):
> Hi,
>
> The virtio_scsi module got backported to the 3.2.39-1 kernel,
> but it appears it didn't get added to the virtio-modules udeb
> for the wheezy kernels -- which means you can switch to using
> it for an already installed wheezy guest in a VM, but
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:01:11 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> For example, gcc will not create a small stack frame with "sub
> $8,%rsp". No, what gcc does is to use a random "push" instruction.
> Fair enough, but that really makes things much harder to see. Here's
> an example:
>
> 81314
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Some simple pattern to make sure that the "sub $frame-size,%rsp" comes
> before any accesses to (%rbp) (when frame pointers are enabled)
> *might* work, but it might also end up missing things.
You're going to have a hard time doing that
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:29:06 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > But wouldn't it be rather trivial to run a static analyzer on the final
> > vmlinux to make sure there are no red zones? I mean, you would only need
> > to read each function
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> But wouldn't it be rather trivial to run a static analyzer on the final
> vmlinux to make sure there are no red zones? I mean, you would only need
> to read each function and check to make sure that the offset of rbp is
> within the change
Hi,
The virtio_scsi module got backported to the 3.2.39-1 kernel,
but it appears it didn't get added to the virtio-modules udeb
for the wheezy kernels -- which means you can switch to using
it for an already installed wheezy guest in a VM, but you can't
install a new VM configured to use it with
Package: linux
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch,l10n
Hi,
attached is the updated german debconf translation
for linux (version 3.14.12-2).
Please include it in your package.
Thanks for your i18n efforts.
So long
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
linux-3.14.12-2_de.po.gz
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 686636
Bug #686636 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux] Please
backport virtio-scsi to wheezy
Unarchived Bug 686636
> # virtio-modules udeb needs updating too
> reopen 686636
Bug #686636 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux] Please
backport virtio-
My system:
Linux 3.2.61-030261-generic #201407112035
SMP Sat Jul 12 00:36:16 UTC 2014
x86_64
x86_64
x86_64
GNU/Linux
Running an i7 on X79 board. I got rid of these error messages and the slow
behavior by turning off the ROM RAID stuff and rebuilding my RAID array using
just the Linux Soft
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:55:28PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> -mno-red-zone only affected prologue emition in gcc. This part didn't
> change between the releases. So the bug is quite deep.
> What seems to be happening is that 2nd pass of instruction scheduler
> (after emit prologue and r
Package: linux-image-3.16-rc6-amd64
Version: 3.16~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading linux to 3.16-rc6 I have problems with my Seagate expansion
hard drive.
While mounting it or writing to it, my whole system quite often freezes and
needs a hard reset.
It seems to
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
No, there should be no extra kernel flavours for i386 or amd64.
Hmm, still not getting this. I thought the point of flavours was to split
off options that, though popular, have undesirable side effects.
I had an idea how to unblock this, and finally g
15 matches
Mail list logo