Is #588675 (/ left as /dev/root) A Kernel Bug?

2014-12-22 Thread Elliott Mitchell
#588675 may not be all that severe, but does cause issues with multiple packages. The issue is sometime between Debian Etch and Debian Lenny the line for the root filesystem in /proc/mounts stopped listing the actual device (/dev/sda1) started listing "/dev/root" instead. One crucial ingredient I

Bug#748398: Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/23/2014 03:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/23/2014 02:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> This change caused a regression for some other 32-bit PowerMacs >> the last time we tried it (#614221). Therefore I limited it to >> 64-bit Po

Bug#748398: Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/23/2014 02:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This change caused a regression for some other 32-bit PowerMacs the > last time we tried it (#614221). Therefore I limited it to 64-bit > PowerPC configurations. Thanks for the hint! Interestingly, the

Bug#748398: Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 wontfix help On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 18:34 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Control: unarchive -1 > Control: reopen -1 > > Hello Ben! > > I just did a dist-upgrade which also upgraded the kernel. After > rebooting the machine, X was still broken as radeonfb was loaded agai

Processed: Re: Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 wontfix help Bug #748398 [src:linux] linux: Please compile FB drivers on powerpc as modules Added tag(s) help and wontfix. -- 748398: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748398 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#773561: Installing "xen-linux-system-amd64" on jessie fails

2014-12-22 Thread Sydney Meyer
> On 22 Dec 2014, at 17:25, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 20:46 +0100, Sydney Meyer wrote: >> Hello Ian, >> >> "systemctl status xen.service" gives: > > Thanks. Sadly these logs weren't as informative a I had hoped they would > be :-/ (In case it's not clear: this is not your f

Bug#773737: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: cannot set promiscuous mode of cdc-ether devices

2014-12-22 Thread Claudius Peschke
Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I have a DSL router Speedtouch ST-536i, which is connected to my server via USB. I use it only as a pure modem. Since I use PPPoE connections to two different providers at the same time, i have to use two different MAC

Kлиeнтckиe бaзы!!! ICQ: 446444644

2014-12-22 Thread debian-kernel
Kлиeнтckиe бaзы!!! ICQ: 446444644 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/61e5f7ce-c37a-4ce8-8db4-5344ca21d...@s-101.ish.intern

Processed (with 1 errors): Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > unarchive -1 > reopen -1 Bug #748398 [src:linux] linux: Please compile FB drivers on powerpc as modules Bug 748398 is not marked as done; doing nothing. -- 748398: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748398 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs

Bug#748398: Bug has returned as CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y is set again

2014-12-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Control: unarchive -1 Control: reopen -1 Hello Ben! I just did a dist-upgrade which also upgraded the kernel. After rebooting the machine, X was still broken as radeonfb was loaded again and blocked the radeon module from functioning properly. Since the radeonfb driver is compiled into the kerne

Processed: reopening 748398

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 748398 Bug #748398 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux] linux: Please compile FB drivers on powerpc as modules 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to r

Processed: unarchiving 748398

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 748398 Bug #748398 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux] linux: Please compile FB drivers on powerpc as modules Unarchived Bug 748398 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 748398: http://bugs.deb

Bug#773561: Installing "xen-linux-system-amd64" on jessie fails

2014-12-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 20:46 +0100, Sydney Meyer wrote: > Hello Ian, > > "systemctl status xen.service" gives: Thanks. Sadly these logs weren't as informative a I had hoped they would be :-/ (In case it's not clear: this is not your fault) > root@jessie:/home/sydney# systemctl status xen.service

Bug#765363: marked as done (linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.2-amd64: second node fails to join cluster and mount ocfs2 partition)

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:23:05 + with message-id <1419250985.26985.164.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#765363: fixed in 3.16.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #765363, regarding linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.2-amd64: second node fails to join cluster and mount ocfs2 partitio

Bug#767471: [initramfs-tools] / formatted as ext3 but mounted as ext4 not fsck-able

2014-12-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I ran into the inverse situation: my /etc/fstab said ext3, but at runtime the initramfs looked for /sbin/fsck.ext4, and couldn't find it. Perhaps instead of special-casing ext3/ext4, it might be better to make it use 'fsck -N' (or equivalent) to discover which fsck backend will be used at runt

Re: Replacing aufs with overlayfs

2014-12-22 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Ben Hutchings wrote (21 Dec 2014 23:20:15 GMT) : > On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 21:53 +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> 1. Due to overlayfs' stack depth limit of 2, until support more than >>one read-only lower layer is completed, overlayfs breaks >>live-boot's SquashFS stacking feature; Tails "auto