Bug#784960: Stress test

Hi, how is this stress test acting ? I run it on kernel 4.0.2 and on 4.1.rc3, but it finish after 3 second without error, nothing printed. So I don't know if it is ok or not.

Bug#782364: linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp: please configure drivers for both Cubox i4pro real time clocks

On May 12, 2015, at 2:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 01:33 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: >> On May 6, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: >> >>> >>> On May 6, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> It would be preferable to test the thing in Sid before the upload to

Processed: severity of 785153 is important, tagging 785153

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 785153 important Bug #785153 [src:linux] [src:linux] Please enable support for DVBSky T9580 Severity set to 'important' from 'wishlist' > tags 785153 + patch Bug #785153 [src:linux] [src:linux] Please enable support for DVBSky T9580 Added

Bug#782442: USB3 external HDD not recognized [regression]

Hi, > Attached a testpatch based on 4.1-rc2 Thanks. Unfortunately, this patch did not help: I saw no change in behavior compared to vanilla 4.1-rc2. I should probably mention that there is a slight difference in the log output of the 3.16 and 4.1 kernels: The "xhci_hcd :04:00.0: irq 42 for M

Bug#785153: [src:linux] Please enable support for DVBSky T9580

Package: src:linux Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Please set CONFIG_DVB_SMIPCIE=m to enable support for the DVBSky T9580 card. I did a test build with this option enabled on linux-image-3.19 and the card did work without problems. Regards,

Processed: severity of 785147 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 785147 important Bug #785147 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: NVMe boot drives not supported Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 785147: http://bu

Bug#769844: linux: please make linux build reproducibly

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:49 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: [...] > With the attached patch, linux can be built reproducibly with the > current experimental framework. The following changes have been > introduced since the previous patch: > > * Files in the source tarball are added in a stable order.

Bug#785147: grub-installer bug link

The grub-installer bug report, with patch, is here: . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/359897

Bug#769844: linux: please make linux build reproducibly

On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:16 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:49 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > > > +@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ if [ ! -z ${output_file} ]; then > > > > + if [ -z ${cpio_file} ]; then > > > > + timestamp= > > > > + if test -n "$KBUILD_

Bug#785147: initramfs-tools: NVMe boot drives not supported

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.120 Severity: critical Tags: d-i patch Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was e

Bug#775812: HP EliteBook 840 G1 laptop fails to halt/poweroff after 15/12/2015 upgrade

Dear Tim, I have the same HP Elitebook and experienced the same issue when upgrading jessie a few months ago. At the time I solved the issue by booting into an older version of the kernel from GRUB. But then a few weeks ago that workaround stopped working. I thought that completely reinstalling

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 18:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there > > > never was a > > > powerpcle userland suppo

Re: Kernel packages for 4.0.2 claim to be 4.0.0?

On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:44 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > Just wondering but is it intentional that the kernel packages for > 4.0.2 have /boot/vmlinuz-4.0.0-1-amd64 and modules in > /lib/modules/4.0.0-1.amd64 ? Yes. > I know there are circumstances where the Debian and upstream versions > are intent

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never > > was a > > powerpcle userland support. > > I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it i

Kernel packages for 4.0.2 claim to be 4.0.0?

Just wondering but is it intentional that the kernel packages for 4.0.2 have /boot/vmlinuz-4.0.0-1-amd64 and modules in /lib/modules/4.0.0-1.amd64 ? I know there are circumstances where the Debian and upstream versions are intentionally distinct and, for example, sonames needn't match package vers

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never > was a > powerpcle userland support. I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it is currently non-optional. > If this is not possible in the short te

Bug#784960: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Mono occasionally crashing

Hi > When using the 4.0.0-1 on sid, after over 100 executions in a loop > it still hasn't crashed. > I'll try again in 4.0.2-1 when it's available, but this does suggest > it's fixed in 4.0.0. Apologies, after being corrected I realised that I was actually testing with 4.0.2-1. As such, I think

Bug#784960: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Mono occasionally crashing

Hi, > Please check that this bug really is fixed once version 4.0.2-1 is > available. I installed sid on a VM, and used the stress test code mentioned here: https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=29212 wget https://github.com/mono/mono/raw/master/mono/tests/bug-18026.cs mcs bug-18026.cs m

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. If this is not possible in the short term, then we can re-enable this for unstable for some time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Bug#782442: USB3 external HDD not recognized [regression]

On 11.05.2015 17:44, Ralf Jung wrote: > Hi, > >> Ok, xhci is reset in resume in your case (indicated by the "root hub lost >> power or was reset" messages) >> That patch adds an additional check that ensures there was some event before >> resuming the roothub. >> >> Could you try out the followi

Bug#785097: linux-image-4.0.0-1-amd64: Screen flickering on kernel 4.0

Package: src:linux Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: important Tags: newcomer Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Installed new kernel 4.0 in a Debian stretch/sid machine through apt. * What exactly did yo

Bug#782364: linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp: please configure drivers for both Cubox i4pro real time clocks

On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 01:33 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > On May 6, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > >> It would be preferable to test the thing in Sid before the upload to > >> jessie-proposed-updates > > > > I’ll keep an eye

Bug#782364: linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp: please configure drivers for both Cubox i4pro real time clocks

On May 6, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > On May 6, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> It would be preferable to test the thing in Sid before the upload to >> jessie-proposed-updates > > I’ll keep an eye out for it. > > But I don’t have one of the cubox models without the b

Dupont J profileert zich op het web, virtuele voorstelling van uw bedrijf

Een website is niet meer weg te denken in ons dagelijkse leven. Afwezig blijven op het net is een gemiste kans om te grijpen naar interessante opportuniteiten... Vind de beste leverancier: http://www.debesteleverancier.be/website/gratis-offerte.htm?lng=nl&tg=webdesign&utm_campaign=webdesign&utm_so