Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 822804 rpcbind
Bug #822804 [nfs-common] nfs-common: rpcbind.service not started on boot before
nfs-common
Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-common' to 'rpcbind'.
No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.2.8-9.
Ignoring request
We were seeing the same problem, as reported here, often. Our logs would
show something like this:
[301933.088794] swapper/3: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x20
[301933.088817] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1
Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2
[301933.088852] Hardware na
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.125
Severity: serious
Moin
update-initramfs fails if busybox is of a wrong version, however I see
no breaks or conflicts to make sure the correct version is available.
| Setting up linux-image-4.5.0-2-amd64 (4.5.4-1) ...
| /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 666021 3.16.7-ckt25-2
Bug #666021 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-powerpc64: Kernel reports page
allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x20
Marked as found in versions linux/3.16.7-ckt25-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
found 666021 3.16.7-ckt25-2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #825929 [initramfs-tools-core] initramfs-tools-core - incorrect busybox
relations
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
825929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:52 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools-core
> Version: 0.125
> Severity: serious
>
> Moin
>
> update-initramfs fails if busybox is of a wrong version, however I see
> no breaks or conflicts to make sure the correct version is a
Upon further investigation I am concluding, that the following is *NOT*
the same bug as reported here originally:
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
[...] failures that would be coming from the
rbd/ceph driver and would look like this:
May 27 03:46:32 vil kernel: kworker/4:1: page al
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 825840 src:linux 4.5.4-1
Bug #825840 [debian-installer] [ppc] display inverted red and blue backgroud
color
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20150422+de
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 17:34 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: reassign src:linux 4.5.4-1
> > Control: tag -1 help
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 18:42 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-4.5.0-2-powerpc
> > >
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 17:34 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > Control: reassign src:linux 4.5.4-1
>> > Control: tag -1 help
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 18:42 +0200, Mathieu Mala
On Tue, 31 May 2016 11:54:54 +0100 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 07:23 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
> > I don't know what PowerPC hardware is available these days.
> [...]
>
> Looking at who's participating in OpenPOWER, I think it's mostly
> servers now. (There are still l
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Fri, Mar 25 2016, 10:12:24PM]:
> I could try loading all regular modules one by one and look where it
> starts breakin - would it help?
Little update: loading known modules manually one by one did not break
it. Finally I used a custom-build kernel with system specific confi
Processing control commands:
> found -1 4.5.4-1~bpo8+1
Bug #814648 [src:linux] initrd missing from backport build (Failed to copy
/boot/initrd.img-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 to /initrd.img)
Marked as found in versions linux/4.5.4-1~bpo8+1.
--
814648: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=81
Control: found -1 4.5.4-1~bpo8+1
Hi,
I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the
linux kernel backport.
cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun
fichier ou dossier de ce type
The initrd is simply not in the .deb:
[1043]anarcat@angel
Hello,
El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the
> linux kernel backport.
>
> cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun
fichier ou dossier de ce type
>
> The initrd is
Also, it seems impossible to rebuild the backport from source:
[1060]anarcat@angela:dist$ sudo DIST=jessie ARCH=amd64 cowbuilder --build
linux_4.5.4-1~bpo8+1.dsc
-> Copying COW directory
forking: rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder/build//cow.9542
forking: cp -al /var/cache/pbuilder/base-jessie-amd
Hi,
just to say that I am having the same issue here.
...
Setting up ruby2.3 (2.3.1-2) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.125) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-2-amd64
cp: cannot stat '/etc/modprobe.d/*': No such file or directory
Processing triggers for libc-bi
Hello,
On 05/31/2016 10:15 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-05-31 16:01:46, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the
>>> linux kernel backport.
>>>
>>>
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 17:17:24 -0400
with message-id <87lh2qnd0b@angela.anarcat.ath.cx>
and subject line Re: linux kernel backports broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #814648,
regarding initrd missing from backport build (Failed to copy
/boot/initrd.img-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 t
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:15 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-05-31 16:01:46, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the
> > > linux kernel
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:12 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Also, it seems impossible to rebuild the backport from source:
[...]
> with dpkg-buildpackage, it's a little better, but the dependency for
> kernel-wedge is off too.
The updated kernel-wedge is also in -backports. Please assume at least
On 24 May 2016 at 22:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 21:51 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> Dear Debian Kernel Team,
>>
>> My primary area of interest is btrfs on Debian. The most reliable way
>> of limiting one's risk while using this experimental file system is to
>> run the
Hi Sebastian,
On 24 May 2016 at 23:35, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 08:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> I maintain forks of debian kernels for the LinuxCNC project. The workflow i
> use may be useful to you if you want to maintain your own fork, Nicholas.
> As Ben says, this would b
I've shared an item with you:
pandorawiki.org заявки
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BBb46DdtaOCeRSjh2BKI6Nm3OJQj6Cugo6oq_HZSFOI/edit?usp=sharing&invite=CIKlwpoL&ts=574e5c51
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
pandorawiki.org
заявки
25 matches
Mail list logo
