Ben Hutchings:
> On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 20:07 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> Could you please file a pu bug for this? I fear that otherwise, it
>> might be overlooked for the next time the SRMs review the outstanding
>> stable update requests.
>
> I already stopped waiting an
I intend to upload linux to unstable on Sunday or Monday.
This includes several upstream stable updates with many important
fixes.
There *will* be an ABI bump (hopefully the last before release).
The '-unsigned' package name suffix will go away (until code signing is
implemented in dak).
I inte
Package: linux
Version: 4.10.7-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add the following options to enable Rockchip support on arm64.
Tested on a firefly-rk3399 using linux 4.11.0-rc7 to boot stretch
debian-installer.
The device-tree used isn't yet in mainline, but I used patches from the
l
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 20:07 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> Hi Ben,
>
> Could you please file a pu bug for this? I fear that otherwise, it
> might be overlooked for the next time the SRMs review the outstanding
> stable update requests.
I already stopped waiting and went ahead and made these
Ben Hutchings:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 17:06 +, James Cowgill wrote:
> [...]
>> The reason the program and the heap are at these very high addresses is
>> that xsltproc is built with PIE and the kernel is treating the
>> executable like a mmap and grouping it with all the other libraries. In
>>
On 2017-04-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2016-11-12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 10:00 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> When upgrading to linux 4.8.x on an Odroid-XU4 system, it no longer
>>> detects the USB sata adapter where rootfs is located.
>>>
>>> Downgrading to the
On 2016-11-12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 10:00 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> When upgrading to linux 4.8.x on an Odroid-XU4 system, it no longer
>> detects the USB sata adapter where rootfs is located.
>>
>> Downgrading to the 4.7.x kernel from jessie-backports works fine.
Source: linux
Version: 4.9.6-3
Severity: wishlist
Ohai,
can you please ship perf.so from [1]?
Preferably this should be in a python-perf package, shipping
/usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/perf.so
/usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/perf-*-py*.egg-info
But I am not sure how well that maps into the fa
SLES12 SP3 and Redhat will have encrypted CIFS too
(https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-April/207533.html).
I think Debian should consider to add this important feature in Debian 8
or Debian 9.
Am 22.04.2017 um 17:25 schrieb deb...@alpenjodel.de:
I think it will be included in Linux 4.
linux_3.16.43-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_3.16.43-1.dsc
linux_3.16.43.orig.tar.xz
linux_3.16.43-1.debian.tar.xz
linux-support-3.16.0-4_3.16.43-1_all.deb
linux-doc-3.16_3.16.43-1_all.deb
linux-manual-3.16_3.16.43-1_all.deb
linux-source
I think it will be included in Linux 4.11.
So there is no chance to get this feature into an official Debian 8 or
Debian 9 stable package?
Am 22.04.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 14:47 +0200, deb...@alpenjode
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 14:47 +0200, deb...@alpenjodel.de wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It´s not possible to mount a enrypted CIFS Share yet. is it possible
> > to add the following Kernel changes to Debian 8?
>
> No, we don't backport big features
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 14:47 +0200, deb...@alpenjodel.de wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It´s not possible to mount a enrypted CIFS Share yet. is it possible
> to add the following Kernel changes to Debian 8?
No, we don't backport big features like that.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is impossible to make anything
Hi!
It´s not possible to mount a enrypted CIFS Share yet. is it possible to add the
following Kernel changes to Debian 8?
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-file-storage-on-premises-access-for-ubuntu/?cdn=disable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1670508
Best rega
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:03:54 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859748: general: fails to address full 8GiB of DDR RAM
on PowerMac G5 (only 5.8GiB)
has caused the Debian Bug report #859748,
regarding general: fails to address full 8GiB of DDR RAM on PowerMac G5 (only
15 matches
Mail list logo