Bug#863389: Missing default Route

2017-05-25 Thread Jason Wittlin-Cohen
It appears that the "no route to host" issue was caused by a missing default route. "route add default gw 192.168.1.1 dev bond0" fixed the issue. The question is why my routing table was missing such a default route. My /etc/network/interfaces file specifically references the gateway, as indicate

Bug#863389: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.3-amd64: After update to linux-image-4.9.0.0-0.bpo.3, no route to host via IPV4

2017-05-25 Thread Jason Cohen
Package: src:linux Version: 4.9.25-1~bpo8+1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I upgraded my kernel from linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 to linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.2-amd64. Witho

Processed: Processed: Bug was introduced in 1:1.2.8-9.1

2017-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 828826 1:1.2.8-9 Bug #828826 {Done: Andreas Henriksson } [nfs-common] nfs-common: move of rpc_pipefs mountpoint to /run breaks blkmapd No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.2.8-9. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Bug was introduced in 1:1.2.8-9.1

2017-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 828826 1:1.2.8-9.1 Bug #828826 {Done: Andreas Henriksson } [nfs-common] nfs-common: move of rpc_pipefs mountpoint to /run breaks blkmapd Marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.2.8-9.1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#863344: linux-image-4.9.0-3-arm64: qOAarm64 kernel missing some DRM modules

2017-05-25 Thread Pawel Moll
Package: src:linux Version: 4.9.25-1 Severity: normal Hello, The arm64 kernel appears missing a couple of DRM modules in the configuration: # CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD is not set # CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY is not set # CONFIG_DRM_RADEON is not set # CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU is not set Considering the fact that