Intent to package carl9170fw separately from firmware-linux-free

2021-09-05 Thread John Scott
Hello, Before I file a formal ITP, I'd like to inform you of my plans with respect to carl9170, and how we will need to work together. carl9170 is already packaged in firmware-linux-free, so why do I plan on making it its own source package? Right now, carl9170 is not built from source, and we

linux_5.14-1~exp2_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:51:25 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.14-1~exp2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Bastian Blank Closes: 990536 992832

Processing of linux_5.14-1~exp2_source.changes

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_5.14-1~exp2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_5.14-1~exp2.dsc linux_5.14-1~exp2.debian.tar.xz linux_5.14-1~exp2_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#993641: marked as done (linux: enable 64-bit tmpfs inode allocation)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993641: fixed in linux 5.14-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #993641, regarding linux: enable 64-bit tmpfs inode allocation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#993535: marked as done (linux: Enable CONFIG_EVM)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993535: fixed in linux 5.14-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #993535, regarding linux: Enable CONFIG_EVM to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#992832: marked as done (linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: please enable CONFIG_AMD_PMC)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992832: fixed in linux 5.14-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #992832, regarding linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: please enable CONFIG_AMD_PMC to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#990536: marked as done (linux: Please enable RK805 PMIC components for Rock64 SBC.)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#990536: fixed in linux 5.14-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #990536, regarding linux: Please enable RK805 PMIC components for Rock64 SBC. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#993707: marked as done (FTBFS on arm64)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2021 21:04:58 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#993707: FTBFS on arm64 has caused the Debian Bug report #993707, regarding FTBFS on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#992777: linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64: does not raise ethernet interface Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 04)

2021-09-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Axel, On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 12:01:33PM +0200, Axel Stammler wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.46-4~bpo10+1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > the interface is not raised and made available during boot. > > -- Package-specific info: > **

Processed: Re: Bug#992777: linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64: does not raise ethernet interface Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 04)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #992777 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64: does not raise ethernet interface Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 04) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 992777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992777

nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.changes is NEW

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:libnfsidmap1 is NEW. binary:libnfsidmap1 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely

Processing of nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.changes

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1.dsc nfs-utils_2.5.4.orig.tar.xz nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz libnfsidmap-dev_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.deb libnfsidmap1-dbgsym_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.deb

Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

2021-09-05 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:46 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron wrote: > > > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar > > > va escriure: > > >> > > >> Hello

nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_source.changes REJECTED

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. binary:libnfsidmap1 is NEW. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Bug#993612: bugs.debian.org: Socionext SynQuacer fails to mount rootfs after upgrade to Bullseye

2021-09-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 06:50:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >I have a synquacer here still and I'll take a look. I noticed on >bullseye release day that USB stuff didn't seem to work in the >installer on the synquacer either. Maybe there's been a regression in >config. :-/ > >I'll take a

Processing of nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_source.changes

2021-09-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1.dsc nfs-utils_2.5.4.orig.tar.xz nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz nfs-utils_2.5.4-1~exp1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

2021-09-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Anibal, On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron wrote: > > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar > > va escriure: > >> > >> Hello Salvatore, Héctor, > >> > >> Just to let you know that I have been

Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

2021-09-05 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron wrote: > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar va > escriure: >> >> Hello Salvatore, Héctor, >> >> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the >> 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time.

Bug#992886: marked as done (r8169: no dedicated PHY driver found for PHY ID 0xc1071002)

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:07:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#992886: r8169: no dedicated PHY driver found for PHY ID 0xc1071002 has caused the Debian Bug report #992886, regarding r8169: no dedicated PHY driver found for PHY ID 0xc1071002 to be marked as done. This

Processed: reassign 993612 to src:linux

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 993612 src:linux 5.10.46-4 Bug #993612 [linux-signed-arm64] bugs.debian.org: Socionext SynQuacer fails to mount rootfs after upgrade to Bullseye Bug reassigned from package 'linux-signed-arm64' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as found

Bug#983332: sane-utils: incorrectly identifies Wifi USB dongles as scanners

2021-09-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: reassign -1 sane-utils 1.0.27-3.2 Hi Eric, On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 09:14:02AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > They are supported by the kernel. They work just fine as WiFi dongles. > > They simply are NOT scanning devices. SANE makes the wrong assumption. > This has NOTHING to do

Processed: Re: Bug#983332: sane-utils: incorrectly identifies Wifi USB dongles as scanners

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 sane-utils 1.0.27-3.2 Bug #983332 [linux-signed-amd64] sane-utils: incorrectly identifies Wifi USB dongles as scanners Bug reassigned from package 'linux-signed-amd64' to 'sane-utils'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #983332 to the same

Processed: limit source to linux, tagging 990536, tagging 993535, tagging 993641, tagging 992832

2021-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source linux Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux' Limit currently set to 'source':'linux' > tags 990536 + pending Bug #990536 [src:linux] linux: Please enable RK805 PMIC components for Rock64 SBC. Added