linux-signed-i386_5.16.4+1~exp1_source.changes is NEW

binary:acpi-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-di is NEW. binary:acpi-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-pae-di is NEW. binary:ata-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-di is NEW. binary:ata-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-pae-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-5.16.0-trunk-686-pae-di is NEW.

Processing of linux-signed-i386_5.15.15+2_source.changes

linux-signed-i386_5.15.15+2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-i386_5.15.15+2.dsc linux-signed-i386_5.15.15+2.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Re: Improvement ideas for kernel and the surrounding oekosystem

Hi Ben On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:29:08AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 11:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > - A lot of bootloaders require special filesystems or other settings. > > Now this more and more clashs with dpkg, as dpkg can't write data on > > those filesyste

linux-signed-i386_5.15.15+2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Mapping sid to unstable. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:14:49 +0100 Source: linux-signed-i386 Architecture: source Version: 5.15.15+2 Distribution: sid Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso

Bug#1002826: rpc-svcgssd.service fails with "unable to obtain root (machine) credentials"

Sure, but why does systemctl complain about rpc-svcgssd.service, if there are no NFS credentials inside? Its perfectly fine to run NFS without cryptographic security, even though /etc/krb5.keytab does exist. I have the impression that the conditionals you mentioned are not complete.