Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1023720 serious
Bug #1023720 [src:linux] linux: Couldn't find DTB rk3328-rock64.dtb in
/usr/lib/linux-image-6.1.0-0-arm64
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.0.5-1
Severity: normal (I would say serious...)
Dear Maintainer,
Until today, my linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64 was OK. After the recent
updates I get a serious problem: no more network connection (neither
ethernet, wifi nor USB), and no more pulseaudio server connecti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1023726 src:linux
Bug #1023726 [linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64-unsigned] rasdaemon: kernel null
pointer dereference oops with rasdaemon
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64-unsigned' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter
I have the same issue on alienware x17 r2 laptop (the same USB device ID, the
same firmware file is missing).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1023726 6.0.6-1
Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference oops with
rasdaemon
Marked as found in versions linux/6.0.6-1.
> found 1023726 6.0.7-1
Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference o
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023720 [src:linux] linux: Couldn't find DTB rk3328-rock64.dtb in
/usr/lib/linux-image-6.1.0-0-arm64
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Control: tag -1 pending
On Wednesday, 9 November 2022 00:27:11 CET Diederik de Haas wrote:
> The /usr/lib/linux-image-6.1.0-0-arm64 does indeed not exist.
Since merging https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/581
the directory does exist and is populated, thus tagging it 'pen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1023726 6.0.6-2
Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference oops with
rasdaemon
Marked as found in versions linux/6.0.6-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023726: ht
Hi Guy,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 11:38:51AM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.0.5-1
> Severity: normal (I would say serious...)
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Until today, my linux-image-6.0.0-2-amd64 was OK. After the recent updates I
> get a serious problem: no more network
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for your quick answer !
I tried the command "rasdaemon --disable" (as sudoer) , but it blocks
and apparently doesn't product any effect. I also tried to directly kill
the rasdaemon process, without success.
Additionnally, I am not sure to know how to proceed in order to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 1023726 + pending
Bug #1023726 [src:linux] rasdaemon: kernel null pointer dereference oops with
rasdaemon
A
Hi Salvatore,
Sorry. My first attempt was under 6.0.0-2... I tried again disabling
rasdaemon under 5.19.0-2 (it worked). Then I restarted 6.0.0-2 and the
issue seems to have disapeared (after a first bad start).
Concerning the patch, my question remains (I don't have the source for
ring_buff
Hi Salvatore,
On 2022-11-05 09:40:20 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Reading through the reports and
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215167 I wonder if you can
> more easily reproduce your issue with doing cold boot of the machine
> or reboot it. I'm asking because it looks that
Hi Guy,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:55:36PM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> Thanks for your quick answer !
>
> I tried the command "rasdaemon --disable" (as sudoer) , but it blocks and
> apparently doesn't product any effect. I also tried to directly kill the
> rasdaemon process, wi
Hi Guy,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:20:25PM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> Sorry. My first attempt was under 6.0.0-2... I tried again disabling
> rasdaemon under 5.19.0-2 (it worked). Then I restarted 6.0.0-2 and the issue
> seems to have disapeared (after a first bad start).
Thank
Hi Salvatore,
OK, I will try that as soon as possible. Am I supposed to re-enable the
rasdeamon once the patch applied ? Anyway I will report you the result
(f I don't make any mistake).
Thanks a lot for your help !
Best regards.
Le 09/11/2022 à 17:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
Hi Gu
Hi Guy,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> OK, I will try that as soon as possible. Am I supposed to re-enable the
> rasdeamon once the patch applied ? Anyway I will report you the result (f I
> don't make any mistake).
Yes right, the idea would be t
I can also confirm that an unmodified 5.10.153 from kernel.org with
debians .config file works.
Package: debian-kernel-handbook
Version: 1.0.20
Severity: normal
Hey.
Chapter 4.2.1.1. Disk space requirements explains how to disable debug info
during, build:
> You can disable debug info by changing the value of debug-info to false in
> debian/config/arch/defines, if it's set there, or in deb
Source: linux
Version: 6.0.7-1
Severity: normal
Hey.
When I tried out some recent patch from the intel folks for i915,
I built a custom kernel as described in:
https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
Now before I installed the custom built de
Just noted, that part of what I wrote is probably bollocks. ^^
On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 03:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> $ ls -al 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build ->
> /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64
> l
21 matches
Mail list logo