Bug#1041678: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator

Package: linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64 Version: 6.1.37-1 Severity: wishlist Control: affects -1 src:linux In my journal I discovered a bunch of orange warnings of the form “at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator”: Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cdc_acm: USB

Processed: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:linux Bug #1041678 [linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64] at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator Added indication that 1041678 affects src:linux -- 1041678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041678 Debian Bug Tracking

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:55:39AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Unless somebody has a better idea then then my plan is to ship in the > next upload of kmod a file in /etc/modprobe.d/ which uses the blacklist > directive to prevent automatically loading some file system modules. I think this

Bug#1041645: firmware-iwlwifi: Intel AX210 reports "WRT: Invalid buffer destination" after upgrade to version 74 ucode

Package: firmware-iwlwifi Version: 20230515-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: in.cognit...@arcor.de Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Upgrade of package firmware-iwlwifi to version 20230515-3, which provided iwlwifi-ty-a0-gf-a0-74.ucode. * What was the outcome of this

Bug#1041643: ITP: ktls-utils -- TLS handshake utilities for in-kernel TLS consumers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Hutchings X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, Steve Dickson , Chuck Lever III * Package name: ktls-utils Version : 0.9 Upstream Contact: kernel-tls-handsh...@lists.linux.dev * URL :

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 10:52:17 UTC Bastien Roucariès a écrit : > Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 08:55:39 UTC Marco d'Itri a écrit : > > efs > https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ claim to mount it. Check > > hfs > https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse Corrected not supported by this package may be

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 08:55:39 UTC Marco d'Itri a écrit : > efs https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ claim to mount it. Check > hfs https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse > hfaplus https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse > qnx6 Fuse ro filesystem https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ better support then

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

Hi Marco, hi, Marco d'Itri - 21.07.23, 10:55:39 CEST: > On Jul 21, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > You are totally correct. > > > Kernel team, please blacklist HFS/HFS+ for automounting. > > > > Isn't this a userland policy decision? udisks will happily trigger a > > module load for hfsplus if

Bug#1041552: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

Looks reasonable. Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023 à 10:55 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > On Jul 21, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > You are totally correct. > > > Kernel team, please blacklist HFS/HFS+ for automounting. > > > > Isn't this a userland policy decision? udisks will happily trigger > >

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

On Jul 21, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > You are totally correct. > > Kernel team, please blacklist HFS/HFS+ for automounting. > Isn't this a userland policy decision? udisks will happily trigger a > module load for hfsplus if udev has identified it, and I don't think > there's a trivial

Bug#1031912: Package cirrus/ directory

On 25/02/23 at 09:39 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Source: firmware-nonfree > Version: 20230210-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hey! > > The Cirrus Logic CS35L41 is a DSP with firmwares shipped upstream in the > cirrus/ > directory. It would be nice to build a package for that (firmware-cirrus?). >