Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Bug #1050256 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
1050256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:01:37PM +0530, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
> Control: retitle -1 AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
> Control: affects -1 src:apparmor src:lxc src:systemd src:pdns src:policykit-1
> Control: found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1052130 src:linux 6.5.3-1
Bug #1052130 [linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64] linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64: kernel
complains about general protection fault several times before host goes down
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64' to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1052063 - moreinfo
Bug #1052063 [src:linux] regression: nvme drive not found after kernel upgrade
from bookworm-security
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 1052063 + confirmed
Bug #1052063 [src:linux] regression: nvme drive not found after
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1050256 6.3.1-1~exp1
Bug #1050256 [src:linux] AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1050256 to the same values
previously set
Bug #1050256 [src:linux] AppArmor breaks locking non-fs
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:14:24AM +0800, 邓景元 wrote:
> Excuse me,
>
> Most packages in sid non-free-fimware has not been updated since
> 20230513-3. I wonder the updating plan of firmware? Could anyone
> tell me?
Because we (kernel-team maintainers) had no (free) time yet to handle
the
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:15:42PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Can you verify if it's this issue known upstream?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/5dhv0s.d0f751zf65...@gmail.com/
>
Yes, it is the same issue. Sorry for taking too long to reply. I was
juggling with low partition
Hi all,
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
testing and stable.
We're having issues [1] with the (backports and) unstable kernel on our
main amd64 host, so
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 00:17:44 +, Gervase wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 14:16 +, Gervase wrote:
> > Awhile back, I did have a look around the fix. From what I
> > remembered,
> > intrigeri's solution used a systemd shutdown 'script' to check for
> > devmaps or whatever of LVMs, ZFS
On Fri 07 Apr 2017 12:02:46 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> /lib/systemd/system/initramfs-shutdown.service:
> ⋯
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/initramfs-restore:
> ⋯
> /usr/bin/unmkinitramfs /initrd.img "$WORKDIR"
> ⋯
> /lib/systemd/system-shutdown/initramfs-tools:
> ⋯
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
