Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread Boyuan Yang
Hi, 在 2024-01-12星期五的 21:26 -0600,rhys写道: > Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of > the irrelevant history. Let me try to strike this message down to avoid the discussion from shifting further to an unknown direction. > If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread rhys
Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the irrelevant history. If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as a native build platform for 32-bit binary p

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread YunQiang Su
rhys 于2024年1月13日周六 11:27写道: > > Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of > the irrelevant history. > > If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm > (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone > as a

iproute2_6.7.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2024-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:47:59 + Source: iproute2 Architecture: source Version: 6.7.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Luca

Processing of iproute2_6.7.0-1_source.changes

2024-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
iproute2_6.7.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: iproute2_6.7.0-1.dsc iproute2_6.7.0.orig.tar.xz iproute2_6.7.0-1.debian.tar.xz iproute2_6.7.0-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1056582: marked as done (iproute2: [INTL:it] Italian debconf translation)

2024-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2024 22:35:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056582: fixed in iproute2 6.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056582, regarding iproute2: [INTL:it] Italian debconf translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. Disabling debug symbols does not help. Bastian > Sent from Ubuntu Pro > https://ubuntu.com/pr

Bug#1024149: linux-image-amd64: 32-bit mmap() puts large files at non-random address

2024-01-12 Thread Andres Salomon
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:12:47 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:24:16PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Salvatore Bonaccorso , 2022-11-19 11:11: > > > Given you were able to tackle the issue further, can you report the > > > issue to upstream > > > > Do

Bug#1059525: linux-image-6.1.0-16-amd64: Secure Boot is active but mokutil and dmesg says "Secure boot disabled" but just with an NVME not with an HDD/SSD

2024-01-12 Thread .
In a Debian Testing System one of the packages solved my problem. Secure Boot is now displayed as active. Start-Date: 2024-01-12 18:59:31 Commandline: apt full-upgrade Requested-By: user (1000) Upgrade: orca:amd64 (45.1-2, 45.2-1), dmeventd:amd64 (2:1.02.185-2, 2:1.02.185-3), libldb2:amd64 (2:

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread Alan Corey
Are you forgetting that 64 bit is slower? In the arm world where it's easily switchable 64 bit is pokey when you don't need it. On Fri, Jan 12, 2024, 12:54 PM wrote: > > > Sent from my mobile device. > > -- > *From:* YunQiang Su > *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2024 10

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread rhys
Sent from my mobile device. From: YunQiang Su Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 10:11 To: r...@neoquasar.org Cc: noloa...@gmail.com; debian-kernel@lists.debian.org; debian-...@lists.debian.org; debian-de...@lists.debian.org; debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Subjec

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread rhys
Keeping in mind that I am new to this arena... I have some Intel systems - both 64-bit and 32-bit - that I might be able to use as build platforms.  What does the Debian team need from me to be able to use these systems? I can't guarantee they'll be FAST, but I'll do what I can to make them EF

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-12 Thread YunQiang Su
于2024年1月12日周五 23:59写道: > > Keeping in mind that I am new to this arena... > > I have some Intel systems - both 64-bit and 32-bit - that I might be able to > use as build platforms. > I guess all of your hardwares are 64bit. You setup different OS on them. > What does the Debian team need from m