Hi,
Please have a look at upstream bug report:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61799
I was asked to test GCC 4.8 and found this issue go away with
locally-recompiled GCC 4.8.2 (upstream source, as ia64 is no more
supported by Debian).
Whether this was expected or not, I don't know.
This has nothing to do with kernel version, but with gcc version, as
alluded to nearly two years ago by Stephan Schreiber [1]...
Upstream bug report: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61799
Émeric
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691576#10
--
To
-19 20:55 GMT+01:00 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:40:27PM +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2013/05/msg00065.html ===
BTW, why is it archived on debian-68k?
Because it was send to debian-ports@lists and not
debian-ia64@lists like
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
If you have space to install wheezy on a separate partition, please can
you try that.
(Of course, that crash ought to be fixed in 3.2.y. But I don't know
that anyone will have the time and knowledge to do so. And it's not
part of this bug.)
2014/1/7 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:15 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
I don't understand that - I still have 3.2 installed on this unstable
(i386) system and can still boot it. How does it go wrong?
It seems to crash with something wrong with systemd.
You're
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
So this is a crash, not an incompatibility with the newer systemd.
[...]
Can you test the 3.2 kernel with sysvinit, in case this is a bug that's
specifically provoked by systemd?
That's why I was saying too old for my current Debian install on
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
You can have sysvinit and systemd installed in parallel and then use the
'init' kernel parameter to switch between them. Only systemd-sysv
conflicts/replaces sysvinit.
So, I've reinstalled sysvinit and sysvinit-core that purged
systemd-sysv. I
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
Sorry, I'm being silly. udev is built as part of systemd now, so this
is independent of whether you use systemd as init. And systemd doesn't
currently run as init in the initramfs.
Uh, OK.
How can I help further?
Emeric
--
To
Hi,
And happy new year!
2013/12/20 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I actually tried building the kernel like that, so you could try the
packages in:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/wheezy-ia64-kernel-O1/
Was your O1-compiled kernel working fine?
I have no idea as no-one
2013/12/12 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
So far as I know, there is no longer any commercial development of
Linux on Itanium. Some old 'enterprise' distributions might
continue to be supported for a few years but mainline isn't
supported.
It seems that Intel must provide hp with
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-ia64m=134858659916369w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-ia64m=133124040906499w=2
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2013/09/msg00024.html
2013/12/11 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:36:37PM +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
FYI, linux
FYI, linux-image-3.11-2-mckinley 3.11.10-1 in today's Jessie updates
didn't change anything w.r.t. gdb problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
FYI, linux-image-3.11-2-mckinley 3.11.8-1 in today's Jessie updates
breaks gdb again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
FYI, linux-image-3.10-3-mckinley 3.10.11-1 in today's Jessie updates
brought back gdb to life.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Just to let you know that linux-image-mckinley 3.10+52 in today's
Jessie updates once again brought back gdb to life.
Go figure...
Émeric
2013/9/21 Émeric MASCHINO emeric.masch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I don't know what kind of information this can provide, if any, but here's
or cgroups support, or
PPP module, gdb doesn't work anymore.
I've also tested the working configuration for kernels 3.5.7,
3.5.7-r1, 3.7.10, 3.7.10-r1 and 3.8.13 without a success.
Any ideas/suggestions to go further?
Émeric
2013/8/15 Émeric MASCHINO emeric.masch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Just
Hi,
Just to let you know that, while kernel 3.9.8-1 was working fine, the
gdb stops with SIGTRAP at 0 bug is back with kernel 3.10.5-1 in
today's Jessie Testing updates :-(
Émeric
2013/8/8 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 16:54 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
Hello,
To pass parameters to kernel, add an append= line in your elilo.conf
file, just below the initrd= line. In the present case:
append=debug=vc
Please find attached the log that I've just recorded on a serial
console passing debug=vc to kernel.
Well, I don't see anything useful or
/15 Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Patch proposed by Tony Luck in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42757 works for me :-)
Bug report updated accordingly.
Emeric
Le 11 février 2012 16:54, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com a écrit
:
Hi,
Time
Hi,
Tony Luck proposed a patch to fix this issue in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42757.
Current Debian Testing kernel 3.2-14 locally rebuilt including this
patch works as expected :-)
Many thanks,
Emeric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Patch proposed by Tony Luck in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42757 works for me :-)
Bug report updated accordingly.
Emeric
Le 11 février 2012 16:54, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
Time to track this issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-1-mckinley
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: important
As reported first in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2012/01/msg00016.html, I'm getting
stability issues with kernel 2.6.38.
I've bisected the problem to commit
37a9d912b24f96a0591773e6e6c3642991ae5a70 (futex:
used by
the callers.
Patrick
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Just to let you know that I've bisected this issue to commit
37a9d912b24f96a0591773e6e6c3642991ae5a70
(futex: Sanitize cmpxchg_futex_value_locked API).
Émeric
Le 17
and
that renders IA-64 barely usable at this time.
Émeric
Le 4 février 2012 19:32, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
Just to let you know that, as could have been guessed from my initial
post (http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2012/01/msg00016.html),
PulseAudio is involved
looking at the x86 version (agh, inline asm is
hard to parse), it does modify the return value based on whether the
comparison was a success or not, and the return value is certainly used by
the callers.
Patrick
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com
Hi,
Just to let you know that I've bisected this issue to commit
37a9d912b24f96a0591773e6e6c3642991ae5a70
(futex: Sanitize cmpxchg_futex_value_locked API).
Émeric
Le 17 janvier 2012 23:11, Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
Since there's a workaround allowing us
Hi,
Since there's a workaround allowing us to go kernel 2.6.38
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2012/01/msg00013.html), I
obviously updated my Testing system to current
linux-image-3.1.0-1-mckinley_3.1.8-2_ia64.deb.
Well, graphical desktop experience is _unstable_. When I say desktop
Hi,
I've identified the root cause of this issue: busybox hook is called
_before_ klibc one. This ends up with /bin/sh binary in the generated
initrd.img being a copy of (or a symlink to) system
/usr/lib/klibc/bin/sh binary whereas it is expected to be a copy of
(or a symlink to) system
Le 15 janvier 2012 19:08, maximilian attems m...@stro.at a écrit :
Nice detective work. So the next question is: why does klibc-utils on
ia64 provide /usr/lib/klibc/bin/sh instead of sh.shared like other
architectures?
#439181 ia64 works only static
Thanks for pointing this out.
I'd also
From: Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com
Subject: ia64: Add accept4() syscall
While debugging udev 170 failure on Debian Wheezy
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648325), it appears
that the issue was in fact due to missing accept4() in ia64.
This patch simply adds
Hi,
Any progress on this? How can I help further?
It's still impossible to either install Wheezy on ia64 from Debian
netinst CD or upgrade from a running Lenny system as kernel 2.6.38
need initramfs-tools 0.99 that produces unbootable initrd images.
Best regards,
Émeric
--
To
Hi,
does initramfs-tools boot with BUSYBOX=no in initramfs.conf?
Well, I don't know! Indeed, with BUSYBOX=no in initramfs.conf,
initrd.img generation fails:
root@longspeak:/# dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-3.0.0-1-mckinley
Running depmod.
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.99
Severity: grave
As stated in this thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2011/08/msg1.html, Debian
Wheezy Testing cannot be booted at all on IA-64 (current
linux-image-3.0.0-1-mckinley in Testing depends on initramfs-tools
0.99, so initramfs-tools
2010/2/2 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
I've bisected this problem to commit
f1a2a9b6189f9f5c27672d4d32fec9492c6486b2 (drm: Preserve SHMLBA bits in
hash key for _DRM_SHM mappings), during kernel 2.6.30 development cycle.
please report upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org and let us know
the bug
34 matches
Mail list logo
