Hi all,
adding the debian-kernel list due to issues with using debian-installer
daily snapshot to install on my brand new laptop with an ath11k_pci
supported wifi chip.
It turns out that while d-i comes with the ath11k and ath11k_pci
drivers, but misses the qrtr, qrtr-mki and michael_mic modules
Source: linux
Version: 6.0.0-5
Severity: wishlist
Please include the qrtr and qrtr-mhi in the nic-wireless-modules
binary package (or another one pulled in by DI). These modules
are required by ath11k_pci to work, which is needed to install
on e.g. a Thinkpad T14s Gen3 AMD.
If you are violating our license please also don't spam our list when
using your crappy combination.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:43:10PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> do you think you could manage to either point the general -devel
> reading population to a discussion of why using AppArmor by default is
> horrible news, or write that yourself? That would seem to be more
> constructive than you
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:59:44PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 14:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:55:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > AppArmor is the default LSM.
> >
> > There is no such thing as a def
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:55:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> AppArmor is the default LSM.
There is no such thing as a default LSM in Linux.
> > The changelog suggests it was done that systemd units might use it,
> > but in that case those systemd units should depend on apparmor.
>
> They
Hi all,
is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest
linux packages? apparomor is just one of many security modules, and
a fairly bogus one to start with. The kernel should not recommend it
as it doesn't add at all to the expected kernel functionality.
The changelog
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:20:39AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
>
> - provide the memory allocation (instead of having the driver staticly
> allocate)
> - provide functions to retrieve various internal data (instead of having the
> driver do direct referencing to deep internal elements)
> - cut
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.8-9
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
commit ba649fa4 ("Migrate the rpc_pipefs mount out of /var/lib to /run, to
better support /var on NFS.") in the Debian packaging repo completely
broke blkmapd, which still looks for rpc_pipefs in the old
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Probably worthwhile to make those !EXT4_OS_HURD checks likely()?
Does it make sense to support the format at all given that it's unlikely
to get any testing?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 07:44:40PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I applied this on top of 3.2.37 and it certainly fixes the crash.
However I wonder whether fsync() should fail or should immediately
succeed. I don't know whether the installer expects it to succeed.
It should succeed.
--
To
Do you have disk write caches disabled on the machine? Neither md, nor
dm, nor loop pass through barrier requests. Without disabling the
volatile write cache on the disks you will lose data everytime the
machine is not shut down cleanly. The messages you see are typical
for that kind of
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:58:06AM -0500, Philipp Weis wrote:
On 2010-02-16 11:21, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
Do you have disk write caches disabled on the machine? Neither md, nor
dm, nor loop pass through barrier requests. Without disabling the
volatile write cache
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:42:25PM -0500, Philipp Weis wrote:
How could it end up in the page cache for this setup? There is no
filesystem layer below the loop device. Any write that reaches the
loop device is passed through to lvm, then md and finally the disk.
Are you saying that there is
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:58:05AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
There is an effort underway to bring the MOL kernel modules into
a mergeable form. But it's not there yet. Joseph Jezak, the MOl main
developer nowdays is working on it. So MOL no longer want's to hide out
of tree. It just needs
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi
The kernel modules for Mac on Linux (MOL) need handle_mm_fault.
MOL is a GPL licensed virtual machine to run MacOS(X) on PPC Linux.
Has been rejected a few times. An now that we actually have kvm
for powerpc in tree MOL
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:45:02PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Has been rejected a few times. An now that we actually have kvm
for powerpc in tree MOL should just merge with that project and
do the right things in tree instead of beeing a really hacky
module subverting the VM.
We
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:20:56AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Frederik Schueler:
-generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
Newer GCCs produce AMD64 code which is
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:40:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
* drivers-scsi-megaraid_splitup.patch
Unsubmitted.
misses parts of the splitup,
needs an update by fabbione which is in ubuntu.
this should be deal with properly in 2.6.16-rc. Better backport the
megaraid drivers from
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:31:34PM +, Frederik Sch??ler wrote:
Author: fschueler-guest
Date: Sun Dec 25 13:31:33 2005
New Revision: 5087
Modified:
dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian/arch/alpha/config
dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian/arch/amd64/config
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:50:48PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
- powerpc-calibrate-tau.patch
- powerpc-g3-750cxe.patch
Can we get them posted to linuxppc-dev again, please?
- tty-locking-fixes9.patch
this patch was always broken, but the underlying issue it has been
papering over has
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:01:27PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
Author: dannf
Date: Thu Dec 8 17:01:26 2005
New Revision: 4992
Added:
dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches-debian/drivers-scsi-buslogic-sysfs.patch
Modified:
dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:31:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
I'm not sure how this interface gets exposed to userspace, or how it
helps initramfs-tools - I just inferred from the bug report that this
led to this information being exposed in sysfs where initramfs-tools
(via udev) could use it
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:54:46PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-12
Severity: important
Hi,
As I've mentioned on d-k, the sbus devices found in some early Ultras are
not properly sysfs-trained. As a result, yaird currently fails to include
the SCSI driver
16. Looked at the sun cassini nic card .. not quite sure why it's in the
i386 kernel since some docs I find online seems to suggest it only works
with Sun HW, but assumed the kernel team has a reason and added it to
list.
it's just a normal pci card, although afaik not shipped
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:47:29PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In kernel 2.6.8 and later, SCSI generic commands are verified for
safety. This may be a reasonable measure in some respects, but it
makes effective non-root CD/DVD burning rather difficult. For best
performance cdrecord, growisofs
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:29:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
do I take that comment to mean that upstream can't update the
drivers but Debian can? And if so, do you recommend updating
Debian's kernel packages, or putting the updates elsewhere?
Well, we could upstream, but so far no one is annoyed
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:54:09PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
So, having in mind the two levels of 'stablenesss': kernel
'stableness' and modules 'stableness' :) we should find the way to
exclude discussed modules from the build, because in-kernel versions
will always be, erm..., slightly
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:24:20AM -0500, Geiger Guenter wrote:
This means that it has to be dropped. Thats ok with me, it means less
work. What was the reason again for not including the capabilities as
a module ?
Making Security modules actually modular means they don't have the full
view of
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:15:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Can this be considered a bug and should I file a bug report ?
wishlist+upstream for proper chain support.
chaining was rejected upstream already. For a good reason because
chanining access control decisions in multiple modules
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:02:57PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Hi,
I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one of
the products that was discussed more than demonstrated was something called
eTrust Access Control[1], which, from my interpretation, sounds like it
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:56:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: wishlist
I would like CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR to be enabled so that the beagle
desktop search and indexing daemon is faster. Also, when 2.6.13 is
uploaded, be sure to
This looks like a typical corruption caused by not turning off the
write cache on your disks. Is the write cache on your disk on or
off?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:33:06AM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Le 17.09.2005 11:18:02, Christoph Hellwig a ?crit?:
This looks like a typical corruption caused by not turning off the
write cache on your disks. Is the write cache on your disk on or
off?
The disks are SATA disks
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:57:47PM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote:
Are there plans to have more architectures enable the newer accounting file
format via CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 ? I'm actually only interested in
amd64.
$ egrep 'CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y|linux-2.6-2.6.12/debian/arch/' \
Can we please stop this my filesystem is better than yours crap?
As far as the debian kernel packages are concerned we should support
all filesystems supported upstream unless there's a very good reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:38:21PM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please can we have the patches in 2.6 for netfilter and ipsec, and the policy
match patch in iptables. See http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html
Dave Miller wasn't happy
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:33:57AM +0200, Chris Searle wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Seen this with -1-k7 and with -1-686. Am testing beagle - so I needed to
turn on user_xattr.
But - when I upgraded from kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7/-1-686 to
linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7/-1-686 -
But right now there are two problems that need to be resolved
so we know where things are supposed to go.
1. Should linux-2.6 go in trunk/kernel/ or just trunk.
Given that we no longer need source and per-arch directories,
it seems logical to just move it up to trunk/
But thats a
oh, and additional point, could we stop moving things around without
a prior discussion on this list in the future?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:18:07AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
Remember the debian kernel is generic for all powerpc plateforms, from
old world to prep boxes, to powerbooks to the last 32bit IBM chrps and
the genesi pegasos machine, so there is a bit more constraints here,
but it is
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:59:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, this is a mess, so we probably need to hold a little flamewar about how we
want the tree organized or something, before we start moving stuff back and
fort.
I believe that the trunk is for main development, and it is important
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:34:06AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
any update on the matter?
have you tried linux image 2.6.12?
Note that I had the same problem when I still had my iBook2.2. The
problem only occurs if X runs or did run. When I booted with X disabled
it worked just fine, so it
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:47:12AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Horms wrote:
As for which package to log a bug against, or cretion of duplicate bugs.
To be honest it doesn't matter. If you email
debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, then you should get a response,
regardless of if you open
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image
package may specify another
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image
package may specify another patch, it may shared between more than one
image.
Or fix the architectures to not require them. The mips changes are fine
for any
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 08:22:31PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
The 2.6.13 rc kernels have devfs removed. Debian won't support 2.6.13 until
this problem is fixed.
Debian works just fine without devfs once installed, thanks. Please
reassign to whatever d-i component relies on devfs to pull in
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:23:20AM +0300, martin f krafft wrote:
You Debian kernel guys would be whom I'd refer... please contact
Michael if you are interested.
Folks, do we really need to spam mailinglists with job offers?
Especially for a known copyright violator on gpl'ed kernel code
like
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:31:56PM +0300, dann frazier wrote:
Thanks to dilinger/horms/josk/svenl for sitting up front providing the
real content to backup my slides :)
What all feedback did you get afterwards? One comment I heard was that
users would like to have _every_ kernel-image have
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:14:14PM +0200, Martin Wesemann wrote:
?/lib/modules/2.6.11-1-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/input/wacom.ko?
which is also in package wacom-kernel-modules-2.6.11-1-k7
dpkg-deb: Subprocess paste killed with Signal (data transfer
interrupted (broken pipe))
The package
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels to sid
in the near future ? Together with a statically built procps naturally ?
The sid
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:36:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:16:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
should i rely
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:14:22PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 312699 kernel
thanks
On Jun 09, Michael Heldebrant Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a Dell Latitude X200 laptop and docking station is is necessary to
manually run scsiadd -s to enable the cdrom drive through the
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Kernel packages are uniquely identified by their architecture,
subarchitecture and flavour. For most arches the kernel images are
built from the same source (upstream source with all-arch Debian
patches), using different
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:20:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Kernel packages are uniquely identified by their architecture,
subarchitecture and flavour. For most arches the kernel images are
built from the same source
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:33:42PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: important
I got the following oops today on a machine with openafs-modules-1.3.81:
afs_put_inode: ino 6501078 (0xf68cdc00) has count 2
afs_put_inode: ino
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Then why is CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled in 2.6.11 ? The real problem is
preempt is enabled.
Because it doesn't provide much benefits while letting broken code
explode. That doesn't mean you should file such reports against against
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 12:10:31AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
I have a dpt_i2o card myself wich I had to remove from my workstation
when I moved to amd64, I know your problem pretty well. Thus I am
interested in this patch, I tried to contact adaptec back then but
got no
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:34:56AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
For tg3 a transition period shouldn't be needed as firmware loading
is only needed on old/buggy hardware which is not the common case.
Or to support advanced features which can be disabled.
TSO firmware is commonly used these days.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_
weren't going to do it, but if you want to then go ahead. I think people
are just fed up of people bringing up the issue and then failing to do
anything about it
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:28:07AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I think they will be accepted if they first introduce a transition
period where tg3 will do request_firmware() and only use the built-in
firmware if that fails.
Fine with me.
Second step is to make the built-in firmware a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
One of the options is to even ship the firmware in the kernel tarbal but
from a separate directory with a clear license clarification text in it.
I think that's what we should do. I currently don't have any firmware
requiring
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 07:45:18PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
can i turn off CONFIG_PREEMPT on the 386 arch,
it's the only arch that features the costly: CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
all other debian arch turn it off for good.
Yes, please do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:25:21PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| Complete agreement here. We're still looking for a volunteer, though
| ;-)
|
|
Come on! I had offered to take over initrd-tools several
months ago
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:44:23AM -0500, Brian Pack wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
When running as normal user with kernel 2.6.10, growisofs gives the
following error when attempting to burn a DVD:
Executing 'builtin_dd
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:17:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I thought it already was marked as n.
Does anyone have an objection to making this so?
No, please turn it off. I hadn't realized it's turned on either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I've put in the patch and enabled CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION for the i386 and amd64
2.6.8 and 2.6.10 kernel packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:14:40PM +0100, Florian Boelstler wrote:
Hi,
just want to mention that I can reproduce the problem with a kernel
built from kernel-source-2.6.8-12 using:
cdda2wav -t 1 dev=ATA:1,0,0
and
cdda2wav -t 1 dev=ATAPI:0,0,0
However it does not occur when I specify the
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:49:54AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Best thing for 2TB disks is to use LVM anyway
At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:24:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda or
whatever
+ static int __init init_ext3_fs(void)
+ {
+ int err = init_ext3_xattr();
++
++/* fix for oops */
++printk(KERN_ERR [%d] init_ext3_fs(), err = %d\n, __LINE__, err);
urgg, this is not a fix but a hack. Should look more like:
/* ugly hack to work around compiler bug
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 07:40:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
I think the effort to do so is better invested elsewhere. As a
general rule, the kernel team strives to keep the debian-specific
patches to a minimum. For people without in-depth kernel knowledge
it's probably best to take the full
severity 281905 wishlist
thanks
The EFI format is unfortunately rather misdesigned and has a backup data
area at the end of the devices - which won't be acciable by lots of usb
devices because they have broken size reporting.
This alone wouldn't be a problem if we could simply probe EFI last,
please try installing with a 2.6 kernel, it has a much more uptodate tg3
driver (and various other advantages)
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:36:27PM +0100, S?ren Hansen wrote:
This bug does not exist in the vanilla version of 2.6.8. A patch added
somewhere in the Debian kernel-source-2.6.8 packages breaks it. I,
however, cannot seem to find any patches that should touch smbfs, so I
can't point it out. I
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably
get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10
k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim
for
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:52:26PM +0100, Kurt Huwig wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-9-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.8-8
Fresh installation of Sarge with all updates from today:
iptables doesn't work when you're running 32bit userland on 64bit
kernel, and it's not fixable either. Run an i386
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Andres Salomon [Wed, Jan 05 2005, 12:15:51AM]:
Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably
get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10
k-s
By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
unstable system from 2.4 to 2.6?
An install of the appropinquate kernel-image package should do it. At
least it did for me on various ppc and an x86_64 installed as i386
system.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
Yes, converting from devfs to udev is one thing that doesn't seem
to be easy. Another one is the ISDN support. Hasn't that changed
significantly, too? And what's going to happen with /etc/modutils/*,
how much manual tweaking
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the kernel-patch-*
packages will support the new kernel
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:22:28PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.65
Severity: normal
2.6.9 and above now have capability as a module.
if this module is not loaded, udev will not operate properly.
and with the module loaded we'll have a
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:52:19PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
oh dear!
... so it'll be CONFIG_CAPABILITY=y?
yes.
selinux also is now a module and it too should probably be loaded,
no, it's not.
2.6.9 it's CONFIG_SELINUX=y?
Guess so.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:16:44PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
2.6 is still too new as far as most ISVs are concerned, and so Debian
shouldn't lower the priority of work on 2.4 kernels too much just yet,
in my opinion.
Debian isn't lowering priority on Linux 2.4 work but individual people
are.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:16:00AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I have been having trouble with the filesystem apparently locking up on
a P4 2.8GHz HT machine (1GB ram, dual 120G SATA in raid1 with LVM on
top).
It locks up when I try and delete a lot of small files at once.
Yesterday I
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:04:40AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-12-15 13:28]:
I checked 2.6 upstream and the refcount field is present.
Curiously upstream 2.4 seems to neither include this field nor
a fix for CAN-2004-0814 (N.B not CAN-2004-081 as I
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:38:57AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Niemann wrote:
|
| In the script /usr/sbin/mkinitrd, Line 497, is a find which seems to
| search /proc/scsi for modules needed to mount the root device. If one
| has the
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:10:35PM +, Michael Shields wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.74
Severity: normal
mkinitrd contains the lines:
8 | 11)
if [ ! -d /proc/scsi ]; then
echo $PROG: Cannot determine SCSI module 2
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Christoffer Sawicki wrote:
What if the PCI ID associations in the kernel for eepro100 and e100 were
changed so that a card is only associated with the module it works (best)
with? The only issue I see with this approach is collecting the necesary
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 07:54:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
The d-i images really need to be built from kernel-image packages that
are in the archive at the time we ship. Optimizing for 486 isn't a very
good reason on its own to force another kernel build cycle.
I
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:14:20PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
it's not a severe performance penalty.
especially when it's disabled by default with selinux=0.
Yes, all the indirect calls due to CONFIG_SECURITY are a performance
penalty.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:54:21PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:33:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:14:20PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
it's not a severe performance penalty.
especially when it's
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 03:37:18PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Jaakko Niemi wrote:
[...]
Has anyone looked at this issue? I could not find anything from list
archives or from bts with quick search.
A few days ago, Christoph mention that this has been fixed in svn
already.
I
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 12:22:39PM -0400, Avery Fay wrote:
I just upgraded to the latest 2.6.8 kernel from an earlier one. I didn't
change anything in the .config and now my machine no longer recognizes
my scsi adapter, which is an aic7902. Reverting to and earlier kernel
fixes the problem.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:40:18PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.8
Severity: normal
The 2.4 kernel supports parameters passed on the kernel command line of
the form COUNTRY=United States; it understands the use of quotes
around the value with a space in it, and sets
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:26:55AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686
Version: 2.6.8-3
Severity: important
Kernel 2.6.8 sets TCP window scaling to 7. It doesn't work with many broken
routers including mine. It is possible to set
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Magnus Ekdahl wrote:
Subject: Problems with some firewalls
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: normal
Somewhere after the 18th of august I got problems downloading my mail from
pophost.ludd.luth.se. One of the administrators
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
tags 272029 +upstream
thanks
Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks.
Upstream rejected them untill they're a lot more
I've backported the tg3 driver from current mainline which wasn't too
easy because of our firmware removal and various interface changes in
the mean time.
I remember some people had problems with the IBM blades, care to test
a kernel with the patch below?
Testers with normal cards are also
close 272082
thanks
Wonderfull, with a grave bug you _prevent_ -3 from going into testing.
Closing the bug so it can be migrated.
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
