Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

Hello Anibal, El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar va escriure: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 21:42 Salvatore Bonaccorso > wrote: > >> Control: forcemerge 917706 991631 >> >> Hi Hector, >> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Hector

Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

Package: src:nfs-utils Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Hello, nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version? Regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.

USB fixes for donated Ampere system

Hello, Ampere donated some machines for the ARM ports, those machines need some fixes for USB, I have built a test stable kernel with it and John has validated it was working. Do you think we could land these fixes in the buster branch? John has put it patches at:

Debian Linux kernel uploads

Hello, I would like to support Debian Linux kernel team by doing kernel package uploads. Initially, I would like to attempt timely (weekly or bi-weekly, it has not been discussed yet) updates for Debian Linux kernel package in SID and see how that works. In anycase, I would like to give a

Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support

ards > # used by upstream to build usbip > autoconf , > automake , > -- > 2.10.2 > -- Hector Oron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#834505: arm64 boot failure with large physical memory range

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 01:13:28PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > Package: linux > > Version: 4.6.4-1 > > X-Debbugs-CC: st...@einval.com, woo...@wookware.org, zheng...@linaro.org > > > > Upstream co

Bug#834505: arm64 boot failure with large physical memory range

ng mozilla-js). FTR, this is an issue DSA is having booting arm64 machine donated by Gigabyte MR30-AR1. I am currently building a kernel, to get a d-i image and test this proposed fix. I'll follow up with the results. Regards, -- Hector Oron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#814648: linux kernel backports broken

Hello again, 2016-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Antoine Beaupré <anar...@debian.org>: > On 2016-05-31 16:01:46, Hector Oron wrote: >> El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" <anar...@debian.org> escribió: >>> cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.

Bug#814648: linux kernel backports broken

Hello, 2016-05-31 22:12 GMT+02:00 Antoine Beaupré : > Also, it seems impossible to rebuild the backport from source: > > [1060]anarcat@angela:dist$ sudo DIST=jessie ARCH=amd64 cowbuilder --build > linux_4.5.4-1~bpo8+1.dsc [...] > build-dependencies of the package being

Bug#814648: linux kernel backports broken

Hello, El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió: > Hi, > > I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the > linux kernel backport. > > cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce

Re: DNS-320

Hello Bastien, (Adding CC to Debian kernel maints) On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: I could donate a NAS under armel that is not yet ported to debian (but debian run on it [1]). I will not donate the hardrive, but I could do if

Re: Further trimming of ARM NAS kernel images

Hello Ben, 2013/11/11 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: As the Linux kernel has continued to grow, in Linux 3.12 the iop32x and ixp4xx kernel images have again exceeded the size limits for the target machines. [Note, all figures here are based on the emdebian gcc-4.7 cross-compiler

Re: armhf d-i switched to armmp only, no armhf daily builds happening? (Was: Re: Uploading linux (3.11.5-1))

Hello, 2013/10/20 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk (2013-10-19): [...] I'm not sure about ancina, but at least hasse had disc issues. Not sure what the status is, but the right contact would usually be $arch@buildd, added. Thanks for heads-up! I'll have a

Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

Hello, 2013/6/27 Luca Filipozzi lfili...@debian.org: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another for development purposes means that we don't

Re: Dropping support for the smallest armel machines

Hello, 2013/6/27 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:39:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: btw, iop32x is used on n2100 which are used on buildd/porter boxes.

Bug#649748: linux-2.6: fixes upstream packaging when cross-compiling

Hello, 2013/6/7 Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org: Hector, this hasn't landed in current kernel.org git, did you submit it upstream? No, I did not submit it upstream, also it seems to be incomplete, and it misses armhf architecture. Please, allow me few days to work on it and re-submit

Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

Hello, 2013/4/26 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org: On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote: * DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could export accounts if requested. * Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to build official packages

Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

Hello, 2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org: OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a

Bug#703209: linux: Please Add multiplatform flavour to armhf

Hello, 2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org: Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7. Which do you like? if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp. armmp ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#702450: linux-kbuild-3.8: please upload new release

Package: linux-tools Severity: wishlist Hello, Please upload new upstream release of linux-tools to Debian experimental, that way linux-kbuild-3.8 will be provided and linux-headers-3.8-trunk-* will be installable. Regards -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable

Re: Building linux on the right machines

Hello, 2012/7/2 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: linux is a big package and slow to build on some buildds. It looks like 'linux-2.6' was restricted to be built on the faster machines, and 'linux' should now be restricted in the same way. JFYI, this issue has been dealt with. argento and

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

Hello, 2011/11/23 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: (Later it should be increased further, and eventually i386 should be reduced to a partial architecture that may be installed on amd64 systems.)  This would allow the use of optimisations and new

Bug#649748: linux-2.6: fixes upstream packaging when cross-compiling

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hello, I was not sure where to send this patch, better here to Debian community for review. I found a bit annoying that using upstream deb-pkg target does not allow me to create proper Debian packages when cross compiling, so I have

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)

Hello Ben, 2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this week.  This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet).  It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other

Bug#642235: linux-2.6: LVM deadlocks and oops

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.1.0-rc6 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hello, While playing with sbuild to build packages on armhf buildd running an upstream patched kernel for i.MX53 LOCO boards (next armhf build daemons). I have hit a deadlock and oops on LVM, so I think it is worth it

Re: Bug#640220: linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x: Cannot update kernel image

Hello, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Michael Ott wrote: Setting up linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x (3.0.0-3) ... Running depmod. Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-1-orion5x /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-orion5x

Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

Hello, flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader understands, most common use is to generate uImage and uInitrd for U-Boot booloader.

Re: Kernel and initramfs hooks for flash-kernel

Hello, 2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:   While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:   * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz post package installation.   * and other hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uInitrd

Re: [PATCH] add armhf/omap

Hi, 2011/6/22 Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:32:39PM +, Hector Oron wrote: I suspect [  184.049530] WARNING: at /home/zumbi/linux-2.6-2.6.39/debian/build/source_armhf_none/kernel/irq/handle.c:130 handle_irq_event_percpu+0xf8/0x1f8() is due to missing TI

Re: [PATCH] add armhf/omap

Hello, 2011/6/11 Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com: 2011/6/7 Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org: I (re)moved the armhf/config changes. Here is the new version: http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap-v2.patch Patch included into patched kernel version at debian-ports.org

Re: [PATCH] add armhf/omap

Hello, 2011/6/7 Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org: I (re)moved the armhf/config changes. Here is the new version: http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap-v2.patch Patch included into patched kernel version at debian-ports.org armhf port, so we can test it easily. You might

Bug#630171: linux-2.6: FTBFS on armel: In function 'ixp4xx_clocksource_init'

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hello, Your package fails to build from source on armel architecture: /build/buildd-linux-2.6_3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1-armel-hju5OO/linux-2.6-3.0.0~rc2/debian/build/source_armel_none/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c:

Re: [PATCH] add armhf/omap

Hello, 2011/6/5 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 22:09 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: [0] http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap.patch sha256 24958a765f5291c3a34edd31aeac2ec2a1756d17c2b11389b639ea19d68734be Could you review this, please?  

Bug#629342: linux-2.6: FTBFS on armel

The following patch fixes the build: From ace377ade6dce2e3cca400281f8be60398f0c04c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:24:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] plat-iop: fixes fail to build from source arch/arm/plat-iop/cp6.c:42: error: 'MODE_MASK

Re: [PATCH] add armhf/omap

Hi, 2011/6/5 Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org: +CONFIG_CPU_V7=y This symbol is not needed as it should be selected by ARCH symbols, i.e. http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig#L31 If some platform being ARMv7 does not select it I would consider it a bug on kernel

Re: linux-2.6_2.6.38-4+armhf.1_armhf.changes ACCEPTED

Hi, 2011/5/9 Debian Ports Archive Maintainer ftpmas...@debian-ports.org: Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Uploader: Hector Oron Martinez (zumbi) hector.o...@gmail.com Host: leda.debian.net Accepted: linux-2.6_2.6.38-4+armhf.1_armhf.changes I just want to comment

Bug#626031: debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot format images.

Package: debian-kernel-handbook Version: 1.0.10 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, While looking to DebianBug#550584, I wonder why do we need to carry with the burden of maintaining hardcoded stuff for some architectures, while part of it is maintained by Linux kernel upstream

Bug#626031: debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot format images.

Hi, 2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Hector Oron zu...@debian.org [2011-05-08 08:10]:   Adding support for U-Boot image format ('uImage' kernel target) in   official kernel packages seem to me the right thing to do, it would This was suggested before but there are some reasons

Bug#626031: debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot format images.

Hi, 2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com [2011-05-08 11:27]: I think machine_ID and kernel_format (uImage|vmlinuz|vmlinux) could easily be fields in the architecture config files (defines). How does this help?  We ship one kernel image for a platform

Bug#626031: debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot format images.

Hi, 2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com [2011-05-08 12:19]: Machine ID stuff cannot go in kernel package. Right.  And that's the reason why I don't understand why you'd want to put an uImage into the kernel package.  We just need to take the uImage

Bug#625804: linux-2.6: fix rtc lockups on armhf

Hi, On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug. Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed by Uwe Kleine-König. I have built a kernel with the following patch and I have been able to reproduce

Bug#625804: linux-2.6: fix rtc lockups on armhf

Hi, 2011/5/8 Hector Oron zu...@debian.org: Hi, On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:   Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.   Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed   by Uwe Kleine-König. I have built a kernel

Re: New maintainer for ARM

Hi, 2011/5/5 Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org: Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com writes: Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels: #604013 base: ls -al on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes with -1 ENOMEM Nobody has been able to reproduce and the

Bug#625804: linux-2.6: fix rtc lockups on armhf

(working copy) @@ -16,8 +16,13 @@ * [mips,mipsel] Disabled CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU and CONFIG_DRM_RADEON_KMS. * [mips/octeon] Disabled CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and CONFIG_PM. - -- maximilian attems m...@debian.org Tue, 01 May 2011 14:36:33 +0100 + [ Hector Oron ] + * rtc-mc13xxx.c: bugfix rtc

Re: New maintainer for ARM

Hi Ben, 2011/5/8 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: I think it would be interesting to have one armel/armhf common config, but I have not yet looked into that. We do.  The Kconfig files for armhf are armel/config, armhf/config. Yes, I was thinking on something like a toplevel arm[el,hf]

Re: Please retry linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4

Hi, 2011/5/2 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: This was due to a binutils bug (#623964) which is supposed to be fixed in binutils 2.21.51.20110421-1.  Please ensure that the buildds are upgraded and then tell wanna-build to retry. Thanks, it has been given back. Best regards, --  Héctor

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

Hi, 2011/4/18 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:39 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: ## ## file: arch/arm/Kconfig ## ## choice: ARM system type # CONFIG_ARCH_REALVIEW is not set ## end choice CONFIG_AEABI=y CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y Is OABI_COMPAT still important

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

config or selected by other symbols. Thanks and best regards, -- Hector Oron P.S.- config: (it is mainly a copy of armel one) ## ## file: arch/arm/Kconfig ## ## choice: ARM system type # CONFIG_ARCH_REALVIEW is not set ## end choice CONFIG_AEABI=y CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y ## ## file: arch/arm

Re: Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

Hi, 2011/4/15 Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:51:29AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:   I propose this patch which enables basic functionality of Efika MX nettop   which it is currently in mainline 2.6.38. The configs looks strange. - Why is network support system

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

+++ linux-2.6-2.6.38.armhf/debian//changelog2011-04-14 22:42:12.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +linux-2.6 (2.6.38-3+armhf.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Add armhf support: enables efikamx nettop basic support. + + -- Hector Oron zu...@debian.org Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:48:16 + + linux-2.6

Re: New maintainer for ARM

Hello, 2011/4/14 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: I don't have time to properly take care of ARM kernels in Debian anymore.  I would like to nominate Arnaud Patard (rtp on IRC) as the new maintainer for the ARM platform (both armel and the new armhf). Arnaud has done a lot of work on ARM

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

Hello Martin, 2011/4/12 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Hector Oron zu...@debian.org [2011-04-05 23:35]: Index: debian/config/armhf/config === Index: debian/config/armhf/defines

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

Hi Martin, Thanks for the review. 2011/4/12 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com [2011-04-12 09:55]: I got some work-in-progress patches avaible at:  http://emdebian.org/~zumbi/efika/MainLineKernel/patches/0001-Add-armhf-support.patch config.mx5 defines

Re: Bump default compiler gcc-4.4 - gcc-4.5

Hi again, 2011/4/6 Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com:  Is there any reason to not change default compiler to gcc-4.5? hppa gcc-4.5 fails to build from source, not sure if that is an issue. --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. Our Sun unleashes tremendous

Bump default compiler gcc-4.4 - gcc-4.5

Hello, Debian userland has recently changed to gcc-4.5 as default compiler. Debian kernel land it is still using gcc-4.4. Is there any reason to not change default compiler to gcc-4.5? Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. Our Sun

Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, Please consider the following patch which adds armhf support against svn info: URL: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6 Repository Root: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel Repository UUID:

Bug#620204: linux-2.6: FTBFS on armel: ERROR: __bad_udelay

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-2 Severity: serious Hello, Your package fails to build on armel autobuilders, LD arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux OBJCOPY arch/arm/boot/zImage Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1761 modules

Bug#614593: Please add new armel kernel flavour for the Marvell DB-78x00-BP Development Board

Hello, On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:21:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: As a compromise, we could add a kernel config file for MV78xx0 to the Debian kernel package but not build this flavour by Debian. This way, you'd just need to add one line to the config file and rebuild the kernel.

Re: ARM: OMAP2+ flavour

Hello, 2010/11/29 Sebastian Reichel elektra...@gmail.com: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:17:59PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Sebastian Reichel elektra...@gmail.com [2010-11-23 09:42]: However, personally I'd like to see explicit support for some OMAP devices in Debian installer, otherwise I

Bug#602669: linux-2.6/experimental: FTBFS on armel

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hello, Later linux kernel on experimental FTBFS Full buildlog at: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.36-1~experimental.1;arch=armel;stamp=1288326292 -- System Information: Debian

Bug#550776: linux-source-2.6: please add support for linux-libc-dev-$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)-cross package

such package? An alternative it is to upload a source package which build depends on linux-source and generates such package. Kind Regards, -- Hector Oron -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux