Hi there,
I observe the same behavior.
Workaround for me is to disable the floppy in the BIOS settings, but of
course the drive does not work under linux (the floppy module is not
even loaded).
Motherboard is an Asus A8N-E.
--
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only
Dear all,
some help came from the bugzilla.kernel.org page:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10662#c4
It worked for me and fixed the problem. Not sure now where to put this
fix (alsa? kernel? udev?), if you need me to file another bugreport
against a different package I'll be happy to
I have filed bug #10662:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10662
Arnaud: I couldn't find which application was blocking snd_hda_intel so
I didn't add that information to the bug report. If you can, please
comment on the upstream bug.
--
Jesus died to take our wibbles away, so now we
I'd like to report that I observe the same behaviour on my machine.
With 2.6.24 sound after resume from suspend-to-ram works, while with 2.6.25
there's no output. Applications seem to work just fine, playing the tracks,
but no sound comes out.
I'm not sure how to help debugging this, any pointers
Hello Maximilian, thank you for answering.
how do you suspend?
I just close the lid of the laptop.
Just to complete information:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep -i audio
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
did you try:
echo mem
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 14:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
hmm i have 2.6.25-rc1 + git4 running fine on my x61s you could test it
too - http://photon.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/
Hello Maximilian,
I did a couple more tests with both your 2.6.26-rc1 and vanilla
2.6.25.2. The latter is compiled
With the most recent 2.6.24-rc8 wireless is turned on by default. The
rf_kill switch is still not togglable (is that english?), but at least
wireless works.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:00:25 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
yep iwlwifi is still quite a young driver, 2.6.24 inclusion uncovered
quite some bugs (wpa, rfkill, led, ..). although it is already much
better then the initial submission we had backported in 2.6.23.
Dear Maximilian,
thanks for
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:20:19 +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
The iwlwifi bugzilla does not seem to help on the issue.
I think I found a related bugreport:
http://bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1209
But the patches do not seem to apply cleanly to 2.6.24-rc7.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:20:11 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
i announce an 2.6.24-rc7 upload for tomorrow morning.
Dear Maximilian,
I was just downloading from kernel.org when I read your announcement.
Thanks for sparing me a kernel compile :)
This 2.6.24-rc7 seems to work just fine but I
Hello list,
I was trying to compile 2.6.23 starting from Debian sources, pulled from
the apt sources published here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
The 2.6.23 in those repos works a charm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux vasquez 2.6.23-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 03:58:39 UTC 2007
Hi there Maximilian,
I found this bug and I think that it's what's blocking my report
#427514. I guess my 2.6.20 works because its initramfs has been created
with the old version, while the newer kernels don't because of
initramfs-tools = 0.88.
Anyway, I have checked what has been suggested in
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 22:30 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
please keep the bug report on cc for future mails, thanks.
Sorry, I always forget about that :)
hmm the question is if sda and sdb come up early enough for mdadm,
did you try to boot with rootdelay=11 and no break arg?
Yes they do,
Subject: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.21-5~snapshot.8808
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi there,
since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 19:12 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
please post the output for check:
cat /etc/fstab
cat /proc/mdstat
cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
Hi Maximilian,
thanks for the quick answer!
Here's the output you asked for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file
15 matches
Mail list logo
