On 1/27/24 01:21, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi John,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 04:24:47AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
John, did you had a chance to work on this backport for 6.1.y stable
upstream so we could pick it downstream in
e issue.
I am happy with either version going into stable. Do you want to
send them or do you want me to do it?
Acked-by: John Johansen
From d716d8e6e8b6dc2fa1db2e72ee95c721aef12064 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Georgia Garcia
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 17:54:52 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: backpo
On 09/09/2017 10:25 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Laurent & everyone else who's listening!
>
> Laurent Bigonville:
>> Le 03/09/17 à 13:01, intrigeri a écrit :
>>> Laurent Bigonville:
IMVHO, in regard to the recent proposal of enabling apparmor in debian
by default, this needs to be addressed
d rewrite it in C
b645af2d5905 x86_64, traps: Rework bad_iret
really should go with this
Acked-by: John Johansen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5485a158.2050...@canonical.com
On 6/26/20 9:50 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Jann,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:25:59PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:35:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> ...
>
Considering I'm running strace build tests to
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
> close to a freeze. Kees and John it looks like there are some pending
> questions for you below, it would be great if you could chime in with
> your opinons:
>
>> I
On 05/30/2012 06:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:46 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, micah anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Its been 2 months without a reply on this issue, and we are getting
>&
On 06/07/2012 07:34 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 15:35 +0200, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Severity: normal
>> Version: 3.2.19-1
>> Tags: patch
>> X-Debbugs-CC: john.johan...@canonical.com, k...@debian.org, mi...@riseup.net
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the AppArmor co
>
> Me too; thanks for the mail.
>
>> John Johansen wrote (07 Jun 2012 16:45:36 GMT) :
>>> On 06/07/2012 07:34 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>>>> If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need
>>>> to store the kern
On 06/23/2012 11:53 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) :
>> On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't
On 06/23/2012 12:30 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote (23 Jun 2012 19:02:06 GMT) :
>> What is it that you think will happen at the freeze? We stop fixing
>> all bugs and do nothing for the next few months?
>
> Of course, and we'll lazily eat lots of icecream while you work hard
>
On 06/23/2012 11:53 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) :
>> On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't
On 02/24/2012 08:40 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:06:16 GMT) :
>> Where can I find the patch?
>
> Kees and Ubuntu AppArmor developers: can you please confirm the
> patches that the Debian kernel team should consider for supporting the
> AppArmor "legacy interface" woul
On 03/14/2012 03:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) :
>> sorry I missed this,
>
> Thank you, John, for your answers :)
>
>> yes you can pull them out of the tarball,
>
> That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility
14 matches
Mail list logo
