On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
[Re-sending to the correct list address.]
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 16:24 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
El 2013-03-17 a las 14:58 +, Ben Hutchings escribió:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:46 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 02:07 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
[Re-sending to the correct list address.]
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 16:24 +0100
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:16:14PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
FWIW we already provide daily backports of code through compat-wireless.
compat-wireless will eventually be changed to compat-drivers to reflect
that it has drivers
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:28:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 02:14 +, Huang, Xiong wrote:
Hi Jonathan
For driver atl1c, we add many patches recently. Please sync with
the kernel, the last patch is
80bcb4238dd858d atl1c: remove PHY polling from
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@frijolero.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e
2009 +0100
RTFM link for ap/master modes
commit 0c099f3edd23586680e700dbe16a484b0d0568f9
Author: Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
Date: Sat Jan 24 15:15:46 2009 +0100
add commas to see also section
commit 585e62cbc9fddaba274d948dd0e1ab78b18fc02f
Author: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
FWIW, I don't create the tarballs
/git2cl/git2cl
[2]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wpa-devel/2010-January/002415.html
If anyone has any questions please let me know.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Upstream does not do
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:02 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of the linux-firmware-nonfree package
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the
work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up?
I think its at:
dget -ux http
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman k...@otaku42.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile
does not
work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file possibly contains
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless
and would like to know
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Given the OpenSSL stuff in crda 1.1.1, I don't think there are any
technical roadblocks before crda/wireless-regdb can be uploaded to
Debian (once the packaging
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
[Please keep me in CC for this thread]
There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload
Hey folks,
I wanted to try to help Debian in ways in which I can with the new
regulatory infrastructure upstream on the Linux kernel. As of recent
(= 2.6.34) the old regulatory stuff has been deprecated and replaced
completely for CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB, the old regulatory framework
was also
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:40:38PM -0800, Geoff Simmons wrote:
Hi Luis,
Are you still considering a push of the AR9170 1-stage firmware to
linux-firmware, as per your previous intention? [1]
Well so I was hoping more people would test the GPL based firmware
and instead support that [1]. But
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Sam Morris s...@robots.org.uk wrote:
Does anyone know where the firmware for the p54 driver comes from?
It seems to live at http://prism54.org/firmware/, but there is no
statement about the origin of those files, nor their copyright or
licensing status. I've
24 matches
Mail list logo
