Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-09 Thread Martin Teufel
rote: > forwarded 624549 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37040 > quit > > Martin Teufel wrote: > > > Here it is: Bug 37040 > > Thanks! Marking it. > > > kernel: Linux 2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64 (2.6.38-3~bpo60+1) > > (it was the same with Linux 2.6.3

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-09 Thread Martin Teufel
Hi! On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:07:05PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Mm, I have read your report carefully enough yet, but: did you get any > response upstream? I would suggest filing a bug at [1], product DRI, > component DRM/Radeon, version unspecified (yes, this is the place for > kernel DRI

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-05 Thread Martin Teufel
Hi, On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > So that leaves us with a puzzle: does that mean that 2.6.38-3~bpo60+1 > fixed it (forgetting about the drm.edid_strict parameter for a moment)? no. Without drm.edid_strict=0 the error occurs (every 10 seconds ...). With drm.edi

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-05 Thread Martin Teufel
+0200, Martin Teufel wrote: > Hi together, > > does someone know if this patch has been applied already to > linux-image-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64 (2.6.38-3~bpo60+1)? > I installed this image yesterday and had the idea to test the > drm.edid_strict=0 parameter on it today. - It works l

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-03 Thread Martin Teufel
Hi together, does someone know if this patch has been applied already to linux-image-2.6.38-bpo.2-amd64 (2.6.38-3~bpo60+1)? I installed this image yesterday and had the idea to test the drm.edid_strict=0 parameter on it today. - It works like a charm. ;) Dunno why my patch didn't work... (But I do

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-05-02 Thread Martin Teufel
Hi, I applied this patch to the source tree of linux 2.6.38 with debian patches (package linux-source-2.6.38 of wheezy), compiled the kernel with the same config as of debians linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64 (wheezy) and set 'drm_kms_helper.poll=0', but it had absolutely no affect. Same messages every

Bug#624549: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-04-29 Thread Martin Teufel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: important Tags: upstream Hi, I encountered a bug in the radeon driver module of 2.6.37 which still exists in 2.6.38. I have a mainboard called M2A-VM which has VGA, DVI and display port as graphic output ports. When I boot Debian GNU/Linux with Lin

Bug#624486: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Teufel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: important Hi, I encountered a bug in the radeon driver module of 2.6.37 which still exists in 2.6.38. I have a mainboard called M2A-VM which has VGA, DVI and display port as graphic output ports. When I boot Debian GNU/Linux with Linux 2.6.37 or 2.