Bug#424759: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Please build both PAE and non-PAE kernels for Xen

2007-05-17 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 Severity: normal Using PAE kernels and hypervisor is required for big virtualizing servers. But non-PAE kernels are also required by developers, students and other people who use Xen on their desktop boxes to do OS research, mu

Bug#424759: Ответ: Bug#424759: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Please build both PAE and non-PAE kernels for Xen

2007-05-20 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
AIL PROTECTED]>: On 5/17/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:20:26AM +0400, Max Dmitrichenko wrote: > > Using PAE kernels and hypervisor is required for big virtualizing servers. > > But non-PAE kernels are also required by developers

Bug#493633: linux-source-2.6.25: Suggest libncurses5-dev instead of libncurses-dev

2008-08-03 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Package: linux-source-2.6.25 Version: 2.6.25-7 Severity: normal There is no package libncurses-dev any more. Please update suggest list. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP

Bug#495708: iwlwifi: loss of the connection and subsequent failure to restore it until reboot

2008-08-19 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 Version: 2.6.25-7 Severity: normal Connection to the access point breaks after several reassociations and driver (I suspect) gets into a strange state when it is unable to associate or authenticate again. I use NetworkManager to handle Wi-Fi connections. Notewor

Bug#495708: Ответ: Bug#495708: iwlwifi: loss of the connection and subsequent failure to restore it until reboot

2008-08-19 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
2008/8/20, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:01:03AM +0400, Max Dmitrichenko wrote: >> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 >> Version: 2.6.25-7 >> Severity: normal > > unsupported kernel, upgrade to latest 2.6.26 has newer iwlw

Bug#497971: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Workaround found

2008-09-16 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-4 Followup-For: Bug #497971 Create file /etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi-fix with following content: options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom=EU This fixes the problem on my laptop. But obviously this should not be the solution to this problem. Either Debian ins

Bug#495708: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 seems to be not affected by this bug

2008-09-20 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Followup-For: Bug #495708 Bug can now be closed, I think. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.26-1-686 (Debian 2.6.26-4) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #1 SMP Thu Aug 28 12:00:54 UTC 2008 **

Bug#497971: May be a patch will help

2008-09-29 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Bastian, Xavier is right. Japan and other folks will suffer from this solution. 1) Either this dirty fix shall be desribed in the release notes of Lenny with BIG LETTERS. 2) Or I can (I believe) provide a patch that will create new "Debian" regulatory domain for mac80211 cards which will be a sup

Bug#497971: Proposed patch

2008-09-30 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Here is the patch that will help. diff -uprN linux-source-2.6.26/net/wireless/reg.c /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/net/wireless/reg.c --- linux-source-2.6.26/net/wireless/reg.c 2008-09-24 14:13:39.0 +0400 +++ /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/net/wireless/reg.c 2008-09-30 10:55:38.0 +0400

Bug#500358:

2008-10-31 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Proposed patch. Explanations here [1]. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545873605649&w=2 -- Max diff -uprN linux-source-2.6.26/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c linux-source-2.6.26.pci-fixed/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c --- linux-source-2.6.26/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c 2008-07-14 01:51:29.000

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-10 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
> It is the decision of the maintainer if nothing else matches. Ok. Who is the maintainer? > NMUing a properly maintained package without action from the CTTE is > also a no-go. Sorry, I'm not a DD and I'm very bad in your politics and burocracy. >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torv

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-09 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
2008/11/9 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> OK, since there was no opposition and there is still no explaination on >> why this bug was donwgraded in the first place I'm upgrading it back to the >> initial severity. > > There is only a small fraction of machines affected, so this is not RC. Th

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
2008/11/11, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Go on and read the discussion of this bug if you really interested why >> these patches differ. > > You want something from us. Also the bugreport reads itself as two > different bugs, which does not make it easier to understand. Bastian, what shou