Op vr 25 jan. 2019 om 17:06 schreef Debian Bug Tracking System
:
> kswapd is not just needed for swap partitions, but also for paging
> named files.
I know
It's clear from the log that your VM is running out of
> memory
> and it is normal for kswapd to be busy in this case.
What is it wasting al
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.12-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
While building some software.. on a VM without swap partition configured.
The behaviour / CPU usage is just not right.
Greetings,
Olaf
top - 15:03:58 up 1 day, 4:37, 3 users, load average: 1.97, 2.24, 1.98
Tasks: 132 total, 3 runn
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.125
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On apt upgrade:
Setting up ssh (1:7.3p1-5) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.125) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.8.0-1-686-pae
cp: cannot stat '/etc/modprobe.d/*': No such file or director
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just got hit by this bug. I had tons of "dst cache overflow" issues (box
might've been under DDoS attack) and then got a bunch of these:
Mar 11 21:54:09 xwis kernel: [1770524.140023] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck
for 21s! [ksoftirqd/1
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Dropping bug report)
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> > Hence the fact that all file system developers, whether they were
>> > btrfs developers or XFS developers or ext4 developers, mad
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Lots of users have complained about the desktop performance problem,
> but the reality is we can't really solve that without also taking away
> the magic that made (c) happen. Whether you solve it by using
> data=writeback and stick with ext3, or
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression
> with ext4"):
>> Probably not an issue for dpkg, but in general:
>> Don't you reset meta-data that way?
>
> Yes. If you want to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Again: Please quote the standard instead of crying. Your view of things
> disallows many of the recent improvements in filesystems, so you have to
> show evidence. All the databases and other reliable data handing tools
> uses fsync since a l
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression
> with ext4"):
>> Are there any plans to provide an API for atomic (non-durable) file
>> updates, not involving fsync?
>
> Yes. Such
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> I am guessing you are doing (a) today --- am I right? (c) or (d)
> would be best.
Are there any plans to provide an API for atomic (non-durable) file
updates, not involving fsync?
Would be simpler (for apps), faster and more general (because it
> Anything new here?
I think upstream changed the default, but I'm not sure in what version.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikxg67y=bt
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Charlie Brady
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:47:36PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:47:36PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
>> Version: 2.6.26-13lenny2
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When the half-open TCP
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13lenny2
Severity: normal
Hi,
When the half-open TCP connection queue is full and syn cookies are enabled,
you get a message like "kernel: possible SYN flooding on port 2710. Sending
cookies."
However when syn cookies are disabled, you don't get
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13
Followup-For: Bug #516705
Hi,
I experience this issue as well:
Mar 9 15:02:31 router kernel: [53539.491257] :00:0b.0: tulip_stop_rxtx()
failed (CSR5 0xf026 CSR6 0xb3862002)
Mar 9 15:02:37 router kernel: [53545.491052] :00:0b.0: t
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #454777
Hi,
> There is, after someone, usualy me, added it to the meta packages.
Are there?
I have been stuck at
ii linux-image-2.6-k72.6.22+11 Linux 2.6 image on
AMD K7
ii linux-image-2.6.22-3-k7 2.6.22-6
maximilian attems wrote:
also you can try out 2.6.22-rc6
see trunk apt lines on
-> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
BTW, rc6 doesn't appear to be available there (yet), so I got rc5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
I've installed 2.6.21 on two different VMware Workstation guests
running o
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
I've installed 2.6.21 on two different VMware Workstation guests
running on two different hosts and both fail to boot.
see http://wiki.debian.org/InitramfsDebug
thank
maximilian attems wrote:
I've installed 2.6.21 on two different VMware Workstation guests
running on two different hosts and both fail to boot.
see http://wiki.debian.org/InitramfsDebug
thanks for more feedback
# ls -l /dev/[hs]da*
ls: /dev/[hs]da*: No such file or directory
# cat /proc/cm
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686
Version: 2.6.21-2
Severity: important
Hi,
I've installed 2.6.21 on two different VMware Workstation guests running on two
different hosts and both fail to boot.
They wait for a long time at "Begin: Waiting for root file system... ..."
Then it says:
ALERT! /de
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:01:17AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Grub2 put update-grub in another directory (/usr/sbin/update-grub instead of
/sbin/update-grub).
You should follow the warnigs which are emitted by at least the
update-grub from grub 1
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
Version: 2.6.18-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
Grub2 put update-grub in another directory (/usr/sbin/update-grub instead of
/sbin/update-grub).
# apt-get install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove a
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:22 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Are you sure?
Yes:
It worked for me too today. But not yes
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Are you sure?
$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. Thi
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I got this error/warning when updating my kernel.
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 (2.6.16-2) ...
Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link /lib/modules/2.6.16-1-686/source
However, I can not read it: No such file
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
If you have room to experiment with explicitly putting the missing module on
the image,
please do; I would like to include the resulting knowledge in the readme.
MODULE BusLogic did the trick. :)
Newer versions of VMware use LSI Logic by default so it didn't affect
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:25:43PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
Could you do
yaird --verbose --output=/tmp/pindakaas.img 2.6.14-1-686
lspci
debian:~# yaird --verbose --output=/tmp/pindakaas.img 2.6.14-1-686
yaird
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:28:50PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:01:28 +0100 Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try do a 'dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.14-1-686' and see if it
spews out any errors or wa
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What version of yaird?
ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.11-9 Yet Another mkInitRD
And are you running an up-to-date sid system or
It should be up-to-date.
some mix or locally backported stuff?
Try do a 'dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.14-1-686' and see if
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:14:49 +0200
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It says:
/bin/cat: /sys/block/sda/sda1/dev: No such file or directory
Waiting 1 seconds for /sys/block/sda/sda1/dev to show up.
The sys
It says:
/bin/cat: /sys/block/sda/sda1/dev: No such file or directory
Waiting 1 seconds for /sys/block/sda/sda1/dev to show up.
The system is running in VMware.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
After apt-get dist-upgrade the kernel was upgraded to 2.6.14-1.
I rebooted and the boot failed. Booting the old kernel (2.6.12) still works.
I'm not sure which logs to include, could you tell me what info you need?
Greeting
34 matches
Mail list logo
