On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:33:51AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> How about we start cutting down on the options and start saying "a Linux
> system will provide feature x and y - always ...".
> Stuff like (and I'm just pulling random stuff out here) - ASLR, seccomp,
> 250HZ minimum etc etc.. We coul
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:39:46PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Olivier Galibert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
> > functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating
> > direct
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
> How about this then libimobiledevice-utils supplying the udev rule
> and pairing utility, and providing a virtual package which "Provides:
> ipheth-support"? Maybe the provides bit is not required...
Why can't ipheth just depend o
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 10:04 +0200, David Schmitt a écrit :
>
> > Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the source
> > code
> > for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting with genfw.c which
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
