Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-486
Version: 2.6.18-6
Severity: normal
When trying to install an additional Harddisk, I noted that fdisk reported a
wrong size for it.
Some investigation revealed that /proc/ide/hdc/geometry reported
physical 16383/16/63 # this is ok
logical 58140/16/63 #
Package: kernel
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Kernel OOps renders the computer unresponsive
*This is happen during an rsync from hda1 to sda1 (
[Manoj Srivastava]
> Given this official statement, I also suggest that the GR
> proposal is moot, since the proposer himself believes that the kernel
> modules in question can not be distributed by Debian legally.
There are a few firmware files which are sourceless but explicitly
_not_
add a request to bug 360598 to also fix this problem and added
a 'blocking' note to that bug.
Could I ask the kernel team to fix this bug in the 2.6.17 train?
Groetjes, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, wha
Hello,
it looks like that the latest security update to the kernel fixes this
problem:
http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1184
here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6828
and here:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19396/info
Best.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.78
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Kernel updates give this result:
orca:/home/pete# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
1 no
Package: kernel-image
Version: 2.6.8-16sar
i got an kernel ops in the night. i think its has to do with the backup via
rsync to an USB HD
please tell me if you want more info. Thank you.
log from kern.log:
Aug 19 05:01:08 intranet kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virt
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-4
Followup-For: Bug #360598
Hello,
I just wanted to report that this bug is still present in version
2.6.17-4 of the kernel.
Groetjes, Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500
and 2.6.17, as I think it's quite
important due to the risk of data loss if anything bad happens.
The patch can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm2/broken-out/pdflush-handle-resume-wakeups.patch
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Re
x27;s what i think as well.Regards, Peter
/mapper).How can I find out which process is trying to access this inode?I thought I use strace, but attaching to nfsd is not possible, even as root.Regards,
Peter
ernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
May 26 13:31:37 nfstest1 kernel: __journal_remove_journal_head:
freeing b_committed_data
I would consider this a bug, maybe it's only a bug in the manpage ;)
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
]> wrote:
: Hi Peter,
:
: I'm going through the old bug reports filed against kernel, and found
: your bug (309551), describing problems booting and building the
: 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 kernels on an Itanium box. I'd appreciate if you
: could confirm whether this bug still exists i
future.I'm not sure if this really is a bug but it would be great if there was a workaround.I think it's a bug since there actually is no error in the filesystem,there are only requests for non-existing inodes.
So how can one prevent the filesystem being remounted read-only in thissituation?Thanks, Peter
Package: kernel-image-2.6-k7
Version: 101sarge1
Severity: normal
This is for the package version from backports.org, so it might be a problem
with the backport.
I get a kernel crash reported in pageattr.c when I load ATI's proprietary
display driver (fglrx). It seems to come in two variations. I'
Thanks! The atop shows cpu000 and cpu001. Now I belive...
Peter
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* dedesi peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-06 11:36]:
It seems good, but the 'top' show only one cpu, like this:
How can I check that both of CPUs are working at all?
1132k used, 825532k free, 6548k buffers
...
How can I check that both of CPUs are working at all?
Thanks for your help
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0
So I'm guessing we're having the same issues as with ubuntu where the kernel
broke sbcl, cmucl, clisp and wine.
Reassigning to the kernel.
Groetjes, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is differe
this relates is perhaps questionable. You
should disable it.
--
Peter Naulls - [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.chocky.org/
RISC OS: Be Informed | http://www.riscos.info/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #328122
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-2
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 (2.6.16-2) ...
Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link
/lib/modules/2.6.16-1-686/source
However, I can not read it: No such file or directory
Therefore,
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-8
Followup-For: Bug #351623
Hello all,
I've got no reiserfs problems with version 2.6.15-8. From the changelog,
it looks like this is the relevant patch:
* Add stable Release 2.6.15.5:
- reiserfs: disable automatic enabling of reiserfs inode
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-4
Followup-For: Bug #351623
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0602.1/1377.html
It looks like this patch from 2.6.16-rc3 will fix this bug. I won't have
time to test it today though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-4
Severity: important
The 2.6.15-3 to 2.6.15-4 upgrade breaks reiserfs. Any attempt to unlink
or rename a file results in an "Operation not permitted" error. Creating
and writing to existing files is still works ok.
This is the output from debugre
rCHS=0/0/0, CurSects=0, LBA=yes, LBAsects=0
IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:227,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2
AdvancedPM=no
Drive conforms to: device does not report version:
* signifies the current a
This issue seems to be fixed in 2.6.14-1-686, so feel free to close this
bug when 2.6.12 is obsoleted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
On this Samsung P10 laptop, pressing Fn+F2 opens an in-screen display
that shows the battery status. Using the kernel 2.6.12-1-686, the
system is thereafter locked up and must be rebooted. This worked
correctly in the previous
I got this to work now by placing amd74xx as first entry
in /etc/modules. I'm not sure if that sort of manual intervention is
the normal solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Donnerstag, 15. September 2005 10:41 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
> Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand?
OK, that worked, but it seems the package should do that automatically.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: important
I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several times),
but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to manually
edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive any notice
why the menu.lst wo
is the line
my $image_name = $kimage-$version;
in the postinst's image_magic function.
This line would be correct in a shell script, but since this is Perl
this line must read:
my $image_name = "$kimage-$version";
to be correct.
Hope this helps
Peter
--
kernel-headers-*.postinst files.
Greetings
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kerne
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: minor
Hi,
in the postinst of kernel-image-2.6.11 there is a typo:
In two places it uses the word "Igore" instead of the correct "Ignore".
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT p
On Wed, 18 May 2005 09:25:04 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Tue, 17 May 2005, Peter Hessler wrote:
: > : as you like to try out kernels,
: > : did you try 2.6.12-rc4?
: >
: > that does not exist in apt-get land (although, I'm willing to
: > sti
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:52:26 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Tue, 17 May 2005, Peter Hessler wrote:
:
: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-mckinley
: > Version: 2.6.11-1
:
: i'm not aware of aboves kernel package? but..
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-mckinley
Version: 2.6.11-1
I have a Dell PowerEdge 3250, that won't boot any of the 2.6 kernels I
throw at it (not even from the install CD). In the best instance
(pasted below), it will attempt to mount root on VFS, then pause and
reboot. So far, any 2.4 kernel tha
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: breaks the whole system
kernel oops while trying to do a snmpwalk from a remote host. the entire
udp stack becomes unresponsive and reboot fails when trying to bring
down network interfaces. u
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:32:39PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 304071 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc
> > Version: 2.6.8-12
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: important
The kernel image fails to boot on IBM RS/6000 Model 43P-140, which is a PreP
machine. The kernel doesn't post any message on the console. A self-compiled
2.6.11.6 works fine. Note that I use serial console as the IBM graph
Which won't be the case here.
> - Is the Debian stock 2.4 kernel patched to be compatible with
> NPTL? If not, isn't there a problem for some multi-threaded
> applications to switch between 2.4 and 2.6?
No, it's not. Multithreaded apps that want to support kernel 2.4 mu
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-powerpc
Version: 2.6.10-2
Severity: important
The onboard MACE ethernet MAC of the ANS is not detected by the
kernel/initrd. As a result the MACE driver module is not loaded. The
MACE ethernet MAC is part of the grand central ASIC and lives at address
0xf3008200 - 0xf
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-powerpc
Version: 2.6.10-2
Severity: important
The tulip driver should open the loopback on the Apple 100BaseT ethernet
card when bringing up the interface. Otherwise the interface is unusable
for normal traffic. This can be done by writing 0x10f and 0x3 to CSR12.
It's
manent]
pdc202xx_new8928 0 [permanent]
cu
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maximilian attems wrote:
> the modular-ide patch got reworked for the 2.6.10 kernel-image from
> unstable, could you check if that one works for you?
Unfortunately, that new kernel did not help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: normal
I have a motherboard with an nForce2 chipset (ASUS A7N8X Deluxe). Using
the stock Debian kernel, I cannot enable DMA on the /dev/hda hard disk.
# hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda
gives
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
As I ha
to run it from a root account.
cu
Peter
Module Size Used by
snd_mixer_oss 20096 0
ipt_state 2080 2
iptable_mangle 2880 0
iptable_nat25228 0
ip_conntrack 35368 2 ipt_state,iptable_nat
iptable_filter 2880 1
800 is still not fixed and you shouldn't go out with this
2.6.8. In Kernel 2.6.10 this bug is fixed.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bug #282800 is still not fixed and you shouldn't go out with this
2.6.8. In Kernel 2.6.10 this bug is fixed.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ort doesn't actually change after the first
stty command.
Hope this helps...
--
Peter Cherriman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lem with digitemp:
--> downgrade kernel from 2.4.27 --> 2.4.26
maybe, this solves also your problem with the palm !
hope this helps....
Peter
n install FAQ is probably good enough for people who
might be affected by this when installing Sarge.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , des.ca)
"The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confound him, too, who in this plac
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
Version: 2.4.27-2
Severity: normal
I've observed that upgrading from debian's 2.4.26 packages to 2.4.27
consistently causes realtime tasks (such as xmms decoding) to suffer
very badly.
(This is on a Thinkpad X20 with a 500MHz Celeron, not using realtime
priorit
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
Version: 2.4.26-1
Severity: normal
I've noticed this heisenbug recently, where, on occasion, after
un-suspending my Thinkpad X20, some programs (especially mozilla, but
also, eg, gkrellm) crash continuously.
Here are some straces:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde/m
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.8-3
Severity: normal
I have a Tyan S2881, BIOS v2.04 (dual opteron). When the machine boots
with the serial port connected to my PowerWare 5125 1500RM UPS, the kernel
doesn't detect that serial port (ttyS0). When I boot with the cable
disconnect
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #273293
I don't see any ill effects that I can directly link to that error.
OTOH, with some BIOS settings, kacpid will use 100% CPU time. Turning off
"Power Management/APM" seems to have made that go away, though. It di
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 October 2004 14:33
> To: Peter Green
> Cc: Adeodato Simó; debian-kernel@lists.debian.org;
> debian-release@lists.debian.org; debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Dropping 386 support
>
>
> peter green wrote:
> > calling stuff i386 when it wi
calling stuff i386 when it will not run natively on a 386 seems like asking
for confustion to me
why and when was this instruction emulation needed in the first place (that
is why and when was the userland changed to need it)
> -Original Message-
> From: Adeodato Simó [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
> Wondering if anyone besides myself has had their usb keyboard stop
> working or working very sluggishly after upgrading to 2.6.8-5
> powerpc-smp ? I can't figure out why this is happening, but it
> affects the console and X. USB trackball is working fine BTW. The
> previous iteration of 2.6.
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-3
Severity: normal
I'm having problems with Debian's 2.6.8 k7 kernel (from
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7 version 2.6.8-3 from unstable) on my Athlon 800. The
system is running Debian sarge, with a very few packages from unstable.
One repeatable way to t
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Severity: normal
I have a dual Opteron that I'm setting up to use channel bonding. Hardware:
Tyan S2881, using built-in broadcom dual gigE. 6GB RAM (I know Debian's
kernel only uses 4MB of that because it doesn't use PAE... I'll compile
one with openMosix late
Hi,
to be on the safe side, I asked the manufacturer for clarification.
The answer in German is below.
Translated to english it states:
This is correct, the whole software for IO-Warrior is freely available
and the parts for Linux are under GPL.
Hope it helps
Peter
-- Forwarded
s not hurt people not using IO-Warriors, and
it saves users, who need the special IOWarrior module, the necessity to
patch a standard kernel module.
I have also reported the bug upstream and hope it will make it into one
of the next upstream versions.
TIA
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: important
Not the worst thing on earth, but the source symlink in
/lib/modules/2.6.8-1-k7 is pointing at the home directory of the person
who built it instead of somewhere in /usr/src or not being there at all.
$ ls -l /lib/modules/2.6
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: normal
Using oprofile (running opcontrol --start) makes the system unstable[1]
when running a Debian kernel. I first noticed this with a 2.6.7 kernel I
compiled myself (from Debian sources), so I upgraded to 2.6.8-1-k7, where I
observed
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 August 2004 22:59
> To: debian-release@lists.debian.org; debian-boot@lists.debian.org;
> debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.4.27 as default 2.4 kernel for sarge
>
>
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
301 - 364 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
