Bug#801067: Bug still present in nfs-utils 1.3.4-1

The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now ten years old. My previous comments apply, only more so (owing to the passing of time). -- http://rrt.sc3d.org

Bug#796938: Bug still present in nfs-utils 1.3.4-1

This bug is still present, and the fix I give will still work. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org

Bug#801067: nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4

Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1 Severity: normal The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now rather old; is NFSv4 really still considered experimental? Parts of this file may be worth keeping (I’m not an expert!), but at least that claim should be removed, and mention of kernel versions a

Bug#796938: nfs-kernel-server: Typo in exports(5)

Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1 Severity: minor Tags: patch The command given to apply changes to /etc/exports, namely “exportfs -ra”, is mis-displayed as “exportfs-ra”. This occurs because of the .BR command at the start of the relevant line. Assuming that the entire comma

Bug#444043: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#444043: Bug#444043: network-manager: Unconnected USB ethernet device is made to take priority over connected wireless!

2009/9/8 Ben Hutchings : > Please could you test the attached patch against Linux 2.6.30? The > Debian kernel handbook explains how to do this: > . > > I can also prepare a patch against Linux 2.6.26 if you want. Thi

Bug#444043: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#444043: Bug#444043: network-manager: Unconnected USB ethernet device is made to take priority over connected wireless!

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:41:35AM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Michael Biebl wrote: Please reassign to the package providing the flusb driver. In your case that should probably be on of the linux-image-* packages. Sounds

Bug#447659: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Seems to be OK with 2.6.23

Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686 Version: 2.6.22-4 Followup-For: Bug #447659 Seems to be OK with 2.6.23 experimental kernels, which I've been running since your suggestion. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'test

Bug#433204: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Request seconded

Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686 Version: 2.6.22-4 Followup-For: Bug #433204 I too would like this sort of accounting; I was trying to use iotop, which seems to be similar to atop. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (70

Bug#447659: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Since .21, loaded but unused (no devices attached) firewire_ohci, pcmcia prevents uswsusp

Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686 Version: 2.6.22-4 Severity: minor Since .21, with which I never had this problem, I have experienced uswsusp failures because of either of these drivers, despite never having devices of either sort attached. I can work around it by blacklisting the modules, but t

Bug#413265: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: This bug does not appear to be a regression after all

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Followup-For: Bug #413265 I just tried 2.6.18-3 again and I still see the bug, so it appears to be due to a change in my setup, not in the kernel. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'test

Bug#413265: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: pl2303 regression

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: normal With the upgrade from 2.6.18-3 to 2.6.18-4, my pl2303 device has stopped working with the classic error message: pl2303 ttyUSB0: pl2303_open - failed submitting interrupt urb, error -28 This bug was discussed during 2.

Bug#405194: initramfs-tools: Typo in initramfs.conf(5): whithout -> without

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: minor See Subject. -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline root=/dev/hda2 ro -- /proc/filesystems cramfs reiserfs ext2 iso9660 vfat -- lsmod Module Size Used by xt_state

Bug#405190: initramfs-tools: Optional [version] argument to mkinitramfs not documented in man page

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: normal The [version] argument in the synopsis is not documented in mkinitramfs's man page. I suggest something like: version the kernel version to make an initramfs image for (defaults to the running kernel) just under the documentation for "-r

Bug#405157: initramfs-tools: Typo in man page for initramfs.conf

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: minor "The default is to boot of an local media" -> "The default is to boot from a local device" (I changed media to device because "media" is plural, and "medium" is confusing.) -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline root=/dev/hda2 ro -- /

Bug#402386: initramfs-tools: Still confused when initrd doesn't exist

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85b Severity: minor I just tried update-initramfs -k 2.6.18 -u when I didn't have an initrd, and got the error: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18 has been altered. Cannot update. It should instead tell me that the file was missing. Changing -u to -c made it create th