Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
upgraded kernel linux-image-3.2.0-4 from prior version of 3.2.0-4
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
On 01/07/2013 10:27 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Ted To wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up
.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120105022310.ga24...@thunk.org
on the write bandwidth, you really need to
benchmark things to be sure, though.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
what they are doing, but at least
personally, I'm a bit reluctant to dispense with a bug report like
this by saying, oh, that feature should be deprecated.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:32:48PM -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
Ted, since this new iteration has no customer data, passwords, keys, or
any other private data, I'm going to try to get approval to release an
exact EC2 image of this system for you to test with, including the fake
data volume
is install postfix and then send a
few hundred messages to foo...@example.com and see if I can repro the OOPS.
Thanks for investigating!
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
to share, if you want to share it just with my AWS
account id, instead of sharing it publically...
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110403020227.ga19...@thunk.org
touches the atime of the file (and all directories and symlinks needed
to open it), though so the use of O_NOATIME and fdatasync() to
minimize unneeded I/O does seem to be a good idea.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
sync_file_range() is because it is
very specifically directed at forcing the writeback to happen, which
is not quite the same thrust as posix_fadvise().
Regards,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, with the magic pixie
dust. Unfortunately:
http://www.linuxformat.com/files/nopony.jpg
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'd recommend having command
line options to enable/disable use of posix_fadvise().
Regards,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
drive running LVM and LUKS, I get:
mass-sync-tester -d:dpkg current: time: 0.83/ 0.01/ 0.00
versus
mass-sync-tester -n:dpkg fixed: time: 0.07/ 0.00/ 0.01
- Ted
/*
* Mass sync tester
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include stdio.h
#include
);
rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
... and then set the package status as unpacked.
I am guessing you are doing (a) today --- am I right? (c) or (d)
would be best.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-486
Typing 'apmd' results in 'No APM support in kernel' and 'grep
APM /boot/config-2.6.18-6-486' gives:
# Power management options (ACPI, APM)
# APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS Support
CONFIG_APM=m
# CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
#
.
Thanks -- Ted Hilts
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Brian Almeida:
I've been unable to find an official debian kernel which has
Xen supporter after 2.6.18-5 (released with etch). While I realize
there were changes in later kernels that complicated
it, the vmlinux-2.6.22.9 will
not be accepted as a valid ELF image.. Does anyone know what I'm
doing wrong?
I'm really stuck here, so if anyone can help please do.
ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: important
The version 1.1.0 of ipw2100, which came with kernel 2.6.14-2-686
as a module, couldn't work with wpasupplicant because of several
known bugs listed in the driver's website. Those bugs had been
Let your child grow with the best software...
http://xmh.gnmgmc3b3am6ggyt3gytlggy.tranquil.com/?pslk
You don't get anything clean without getting something else dirty.
Afflicted by love's madness all are blind.
Practice, the master of all things.
Many things have fallen
Than you cannot even imagine what it is like to be a real man in bed!
http://nmsr.30ow7mle0d3bp43.bullionismia.com
Experience teaches only the teachable.
To each mortal peradventure earth becomes a new machine.
You can pray for someone even if you dont think God exists.
--
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
