Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-08 Thread Tomasz Figa
Luke, On Friday 07 of June 2013 22:29:34 luke.leighton wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni > > wrote: > > Maxime will reply to this in more details, but I believe the status is: > > * Interrupt controller is working. > > * Clock drivers are working. > > * Pinctrl is wor

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Friday 07 of June 2013 20:02:03 luke.leighton wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >Seeing from your posts you don't have any knowledge on how Linux kernel > > > > development works > > check back to 2004. $ git log --oneline --auth

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:49:38 luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Luke, > > > > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa > > > > wrote:

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
Luke, On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code > > to DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times > > alr

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Thomas, On Thursday 06 of June 2013 11:27:23 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Tomasz Figa, > > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:01:14 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner > > code to DT (as it has been suggested in

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 00:54:02 luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Henrik Nordström > > wrote: > > tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:26 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > >> no john - they've only added it to the multiplexed sections of the > >> > >> drivers which they themselves ha

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 23:38:52 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Luke, > > allo tomasz :) > > ok - much of what you say is duplicated by what russell said, so in > effect the same reply is relevan

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 22:16:37 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:00:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > 2) Having U-Boot itself read a DT and configure itself, just like the > > kernel does. This is relatively new, and only supported by a few > > boards > > (all

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 16:48:27 jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready > > > or > > > not. I mer

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Luke, On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 22:15:08 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > [i've just received word, please remove debian-release from > discussions!] > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > > Why don't you try converting the sunxi code over to device tree? > > o